Kaeda
Free · Sourced
← All cases
StandOut CV
United Kingdom · founded 2015 · bootstrapped, no funding · sold to a private investor in 2026 · traffic 100% organic SEO
👤 Andrew Fennell (Ex-recruiter (10 yrs; Barclays, Deloitte). Taught himself SEO after a bad Fiverr hire, then out-published every rival.)🌐 siteandrew-fennell.comLinkedIn

From a brand-new domain to 18 million organic visitors and 23,000 buyers — all from content Google couldn't ignore.

Will it work? · our read
Won on SEO. A commodity product won on distribution, not features: 1,000+ articles made it the UK's top CV site. He exited in 2026 — arguably as AI began eroding the SEO traffic that fed it.
01How the money moves
1,000+ CV articles rank on Google
Visitors build a CV free in-browser
Pay to download the finished CV
02The numbers
£40K
MRR at exit
IH '26
18M
organic visitors
founder
23,000
paying customers
IH '26
All organic — zero paid ads, tiny team. Indie Hackers
£40K MRR (about $50K) and 23,000 buyers at exit — all from SEO, no funding.
03Weight class — CENTStap an axis
ControlEntryNeedTimeScale
Control Low
Owns the brand, but 100% of traffic is Google's to give or revoke. One core update could gut the funnel.
04The key move
Own the SERP
Rather than buy clicks, he taught himself SEO and published 1,000+ articles targeting 'example [job] CV' searches. Google sent 18M free visitors the builder converted. Near-zero CAC; the moat compounds daily.
fact
The counter-intuitive move
But it's a single-channel bet. The same SEO that built it can vanish in one Google update — or in AI answers that write your CV without ever visiting his site.
our read
05Where the moat is
Why couldn't a funded rival just outspend him?
1,000+ ranking articles = UK's #1 CV advice site18M organic visitors, near-zero CACRecruiter authority (10 yrs) behind the adviceProgrammatic publishing (Python) at 2-person scale
06How it diesmedium confidence
The dead twin: a CV builder with no SEO. Paid CAC eats the margin and the product is a commodity. Now AI writes CVs free — the informational searches that fed the whole funnel are the first traffic to vanish. our read
Show evidence · counter
Evidence: One page ('CV template PDF') generated £158,120 across 2023-26 — the whole model is that SEO-dependent.
Counter: He sold in 2026 to a private investor — arguably timing the exit just before AI fully hits. Evergreen demand and brand still convert direct traffic.
07Against rivals
Zetyabout $3 trial, auto-renews
Resume.ioabout $3 trial, auto-renews
StandOut CVPay-to-download
NovoresumeFree tier + paid
Bars = relative organic reach (illustrative). Global giants outrank StandOut worldwide, but it owns UK CV-advice search with a 2-person team and no ads. our read
08Who uses it
Job seekersCareer changersGraduatesUK professionals
Would it work for you?
Do you have insider authority in a boring, search-heavy niche you could out-publish everyone in?
The moat was owning the SERP, not the app. Where could your content out-rank money? We don't score you — you answer.
🚀Use it as a launchpada prompt for your own AI
Copy → paste into your AI → then develop it freely in the conversation.
You are a sharp, honest startup strategist. Use the proven case below as a launchpad for MY idea — help me find my own angle, not copy it. <my_profile> Domain I know: [your domain] My unfair advantage (access/audience): [your edge] Interests: [your interests] Resources & goal: [your resources] · [your goal] </my_profile> <case name="StandOut CV" model="saas"> What it does: A CV/resume builder funneled entirely by SEO content — free to build, pay to download. Why it won (moat): 1,000+ ranking articles = the UK's #1 CV advice site; 18M organic visitors at near-zero CAC. Weakest axis (CENTS): One channel (Google). Transactional, low-recurrence revenue. The product itself is a commodity. How it could die: A Google algo shift or AI-written CVs evaporate the informational traffic that feeds the funnel. </case> <task> Be a skeptical operator, not a cheerleader. No generic startup platitudes. If my angle is weak, say so plainly. First, a reality check: markets like this mostly fail. State the honest base rate (how crowded/hard is this?) and the ONE specific thing that would have to be true for ME to be the exception — grounded in my profile above. Then a compact table: - Fit — does this pattern suit my edge, or fight my gap? - Angle — my sharpest differentiation vs StandOut CV (concrete, not "better UX") - Distribution — exactly where my first 100 users come from (this is the hardest part — be specific, not "content marketing") - Risk — its "how it dies" (above) in MY situation Finish with one line: "The single thing to do next." Use only the facts above; if data is thin, say so — never invent numbers. Then stay with me and go deeper on whatever I ask — tech stack, rough cost & time, the smallest MVP to test, pricing, or timing. </task>
✓ Copied — paste into your AI
👤Placeholders like [your domain] auto-fill from your profile — example values for now.Set up profile →
Sourcesupdated · daily
Revenue (£40K MRR, about $50K), 23,000 paying customers, and 18M organic visitors are founder-disclosed by Andrew Fennell in his Indie Hackers interview and About page — first-party, STATED, not audited. He sold StandOut CV to an unnamed 'private investor' in 2026; deal price undisclosed. The one-page figure (£158,120) is founder-stated. The 'dies' — AI-written CVs plus a Google update eroding informational search traffic — is our read [our read], not his claim; he frames the exit around organic-growth lessons, so treat the AI risk as our pre-mortem, not documented drama. Rival names/prices are illustrative of the trial-to-subscription model, not exact quotes. No numbers invented. We never score you.