Prolific
👤 Ekaterina Damer & Phelim Bradley (Two Oxford/Sheffield PhDs who lived the pain of junk study data — so they vetted the supply side rivals ignored. Bradley now CEO.)🌐 siteLinkedInLinkedIn
Built to fix junk academic survey data. Then the AI boom made 'verified humans' the scarcest input in tech.
Will it work? · our read
Vetted supply wins. The moat isn't code — it's a decade-built pool of ID-verified, fairly-paid humans. AI labs now pay far more for that pool than academics ever did.
01How the money moves
Researcher or AI lab funds a study or annotation task
→
Vetted participants complete it, paid a fair wage (about 70%)
→
Prolific keeps a 33-43% platform fee on top
02The numbers
$18.2MEstimate2024 rev · Latka est
2024-10
the sentence on the page
SaaS Database / Industries / Prolific Prolific London , England , United Kingdom prolific.co 2024 Revenue $18.2M (Est.) Customers 3K Funding $0 Avg ACV $6.1K Team 414 Founded 2019 Company Revenue…
GMV (participant payouts) is far larger and pass-through; the platform fee is the real revenue. Prolific pricing
about $18M rev (2024, Latka) · participant payouts far larger (GMV)
🔒
You have the verdict. Members get the work behind it.
- The CENTS scorecard — where it's strong, where it's soft
- The founder's key move, and the counter-move
- How it could die — the evidence, and how sure we are
- The case against our own call
- A 🚀 launchpad prompt — the case, as a plan for your business
We rate our own confidence — and argue against ourselves. Nobody else in this category does.
Sources always public on all 560 cases · cancel anytime · 14-day refund
See a full teardown, free → ImportYetiSourcesSources last checked 25 August 2026
Latka — about $18.2M revenue, 3K customersSacra — estimates about $350M annualized by 2026 (AI-data surge)Partech — £25m ($32M) Series A, 2023Prolific — pricing: 42.8% corporate / 33.3% academic feeEnSpire Oxford — Ekaterina Damer founder interview
Revenue is not officially disclosed. Latka cites about $18M (founder-shared, unverified — treat as estimate). Sacra estimates roughly $350M annualized by 2026 on the AI-data surge — a third-party estimate, not a filing, so I did not headline it. Participant payouts (GMV, tens of millions of pounds) are pass-through, not revenue; the 33-43% fee is the revenue. Prolific bootstrapped 2014-2019, then took YC (2019) and a $32M/£25M Series A (2023) — not a pure bootstrap. The 4x data-quality edge over MTurk comes from peer-reviewed studies, not Prolific marketing. No fabricated drama: the win is a decade of unglamorous supply-side vetting that the AI boom repriced. We never score you.