Corrections · Kaeda

fathomrevenue.value

was$1M/mo

now$1M/mo

our $12M/yr was Starter Story's $1M/mo multiplied by twelve, and it was cited to Fathom's year-review post, which contains no money figure at all. Starter Story labels its own revenue figures 'estimated from public sources', so this is an estimate and the card now says whose.

dealcheckrevenue.sourceUrl

washttps://dealcheck.io/about/

nowhttps://dealcheck.io/

the 350,000 figure is on the homepage, not the About page we cited - which carries no count at all.

servicem8revenue.value

was50M+

now$50B+

our "50M+" was wrong three ways at once: the figure is $50 BILLION not 50 million, it is the VALUE of jobs billed through the platform and not a count of them, and it is on the pricing page, not the About page we cited. That About page carries no numbers at all. This is money passing through, not money ServiceM8 keeps - revenue is not disclosed.

sharetriberevenue.original

was(none)

now204K REVENUE/MO

the cited page prints a MONTHLY figure; our $2.4M is that annualised. The card now says so.

rightcapitalrevenue.value

wasabout $20M

now$19.7M

Growjo prints $19.7M; we rounded it to about $20M. A rounding of an estimate is not on any page - and the label now names the estimator.

sansansources

washttps://ir.corp-sansan.com/en/ir/library/earnings/report/annual_reports_ceo.html

nowhttps://ir.corp-sansan.com/en/ir/library/earnings.html

Sansan moved its IR library; the old page 404s. The replacement was fetched and returns 200.

halopsadomain

washalopsa.com

nowusehalo.com

the company moved to usehalo.com; HaloPSA is still a named product there, alongside HaloITSM and HaloCRM. The teardown is unchanged - only the link a reader clicks.

boomcloudrivals[BoomCloud].price

was$399/mo+

nowlicense + $3.50/member/mo

the base fee is not published by BoomCloud; only the $3.50 per-member rate is

boomcloudmoney_flow

wasBoomCloud bills $399/mo + $3.50 per member

nowBoomCloud bills a single-location license + $3.50 per member, per month

confirmed the audit: boomcloudapps.com/pricing/ sells exactly one thing - 'BoomCloud Membership Software / Single Location License + $3.50/mo/patient', with 'Custom Pricing for Multi Location'. The string '399' appears on that page only inside a WordPress menu id (menu-item-4399723), never as a price. The card's source annotation credited the $399 to that pricing page, which does not carry it. $399/mo does exist, but only in the third-party review the card also cites (themolarreport.com: '$399/month is premium pricing'), not as a first-party published rate - so I did not launder it into a first-party claim. money_flow now states only what BoomCloud itself publishes.

mobbinrivals[Mobbin].price

was$240-480/yr

now$120-192/yr (billed yearly)

same: Pro $10/mo and Team $16/member/mo, both billed yearly

mobbinmoney_flow

wasDesigners subscribe (about $240-480/yr) to search, not screenshot

nowDesigners subscribe (about $120-192/yr, billed yearly) to search, not screenshot

price was about 2x too high. Mobbin is geo-priced, so I read it from a US-crawled Wayback snapshot of mobbin.com/pricing (2026-07-07): Pro '$10 per month billed yearly' and Team '$16 per member/month billed yearly', i.e. $120/yr and $192/yr. Confirmed against the live page from here, which shows the same plans in KRW (Pro 14,000 won/mo billed yearly). Default toggle is Yearly; the only shorter term is Quarterly (Pro $15/mo equivalent), there is no monthly plan.

reviewsiometrics[all-cash exit (2022)].label

wasall-cash exit (2022)

nowexit, founder-stated (2022)

the value is kept - it is the founder's own figure, and his post (Nov 22 2022) is headlined 'REVIEWS.io has been acquired in a $72 million deal' with the body 'We have sold our stake in the business for $72million'. But the LABEL was doing two dishonest jobs: (1) 'all-cash' is carried by NO cited page - I could not find that word in any of them, so I removed the claim rather than keep an unsourced qualifier; (2) the card picked one figure silently while its own cited sources disagree - SaaS Club's page says '$82 million SaaS exit', Leicester Startups says '£72m'. (Note £72m at Nov-2022 rates is roughly $82M, so these may be one deal in two currencies, but I will not adjudicate that.) The label now states plainly that this is the founder's number.

metrcmoney_flow

wasEvery licensed operator pays $40/mo + RFID tags to stay legal

nowEvery licensed operator pays a monthly Metrc fee ($40/mo in Oklahoma) + RFID tags to stay legal

the $40 is real but state-specific, and the card generalized it to every operator. Source states: 'In addition to paying $40 per month to access the Metrc software, operators in Oklahoma are expected to pay for the RFID tags, too: 25 cents for each package tag and 45 cents per RFID tag.' Fees are set per state contract, so the figure is now scoped to the state it was reported for.

metrcmetrics[California contract alone]

was$28.4M/yr

nowup to $28.4M/yr

the badge misattributed this to Metrc and presented a ceiling as realized revenue. The article says verbatim: 'The contract will not exceed $28.4 million annually, or $113.6 million for four years, the DCC confirmed to MJBizDaily' and 'The new contract took effect July 1 ... and will run for four years.' So it is a cap, confirmed by California's Department of Cannabis Control - not a Metrc statement and not booked revenue.

metrcmetrics[California contract alone].label

wasCalifornia contract alone

nowCA contract cap (4-yr, from Jul 2024)

the badge misattributed this to Metrc and presented a ceiling as realized revenue. The article says verbatim: 'The contract will not exceed $28.4 million annually, or $113.6 million for four years, the DCC confirmed to MJBizDaily' and 'The new contract took effect July 1 ... and will run for four years.' So it is a cap, confirmed by California's Department of Cannabis Control - not a Metrc statement and not booked revenue.

rentecdirectrivals[Rentec Direct].price

was$45+/mo

now$50+/mo (monthly)

$45 is the annual-billing rate; the monthly rack floor is $50

rentecdirectmoney_flow

wasLandlord subscribes: $45-$3,000/mo by unit count

nowLandlord subscribes: from $50/mo monthly ($45/mo if billed annually), scaling by unit count

TRAP 3: $45 is the ANNUAL rate. rentecdirect.com/pricing defaults to the annual column - its own script sets 'var ts = Annual' and 'units = 10' at load. I ran the page's own pricing function: calc_price returns pro = max(2 x units, 50) and pm = max(2.5 x units, 50) per month, with annual 10% off. So the monthly floor is $50/mo and the annual floor is $45/mo (billed $540/yr, 'Save $60' - internally consistent: 50 x 12 = 600, 45 x 12 = 540). The $3,000 ceiling is on no page; the published calculator runs to 2,500 units (Pro $5,000/mo) then 'contact us', so I removed the invented ceiling rather than substitute one.

feedbackpandarivals[FeedbackPanda].price

wasabout $10/mo

now$15/mo (at exit)

same transcript; $15/mo was the price by the exit era

feedbackpandamoney_flow

wasTeacher pays about $10/month to reclaim hours weekly — recurring subscription.

nowTeacher paid $15/month (raised from $5, then $10) to reclaim hours weekly — recurring subscription.

$10 was a mid-life price, not the price at exit. The cited SFTROU transcript has Arvid saying verbatim 'It was $10 for a year, and then we decided to increase it again by 50% to what is now $15 monthly', and the host confirming 'Your price points - at least today - are $15 a month'. Past tense because the card describes a company that was sold in 2019.

catawikimoney_flow

wasIt sells - Catawiki takes 12.5% from seller + 9% from buyer

nowIt sells - Catawiki takes 12.5% + a fixed fee from the seller, plus a 9% + €3 Buyer Protection fee from the buyer

both fees are real, but the 9% was uncited and the seller's fixed fee was omitted. The cited seller page carries only 'The seller success fee is 12.5% of the price your object sells for and an additional fixed amount, excluding VAT'. The buyer side is on a page the card never cited: https://www.catawiki.com/en/help/fees/what-is-the-buyer-protection-fee - 'The Buyer Protection fee is 9% of the final bid amount plus a fixed amount of €3' (confirmed in the rendered DOM).

astrosagemoney_flow

was1.5M daily users ask life questions: career, marriage, health

now1.2M daily users ask life questions: career, marriage, health

astrosage.com says 'over 1.2 million daily (DAU)'; the 1.5M figure comes only from the sponsored press release

astrosagemoney_flow

wasFree Kundli & horoscope tools pull 80M installs via SEO

nowFree Kundli & horoscope tools pull 67.5M+ installs via SEO

aligned to the company's own site (over 6.75 crore downloads) rather than its sponsored press release

astrosagemetrics[app downloads]

was80M+

now67.5M+

the card asserted the press release's 80M+ as bare fact while the company's own live site contradicts it. astrosage.com states verbatim: 'engaging over 1.2 million daily (DAU) and 11 million monthly users (MAU). With over 6.75 crore app downloads' - 6.75 crore is 67.5M. Note the 80M+ source is a PNN/ANI SPONSORED press release (Business Standard, Feb 16 2026), the weakest sourcing tier. Switched to the first-party live figure, which is also strictly safe: 'over 67.5M' stays true even if 80M is the real number.

astrosagemetrics[app downloads].label

wasapp downloads

nowapp downloads (co. site)

the card asserted the press release's 80M+ as bare fact while the company's own live site contradicts it. astrosage.com states verbatim: 'engaging over 1.2 million daily (DAU) and 11 million monthly users (MAU). With over 6.75 crore app downloads' - 6.75 crore is 67.5M. Note the 80M+ source is a PNN/ANI SPONSORED press release (Business Standard, Feb 16 2026), the weakest sourcing tier. Switched to the first-party live figure, which is also strictly safe: 'over 67.5M' stays true even if 80M is the real number.

pricechartingmetrics[monthly users].label

wasmonthly users

nowmonthly users (Sep 2023)

the number is real but is a drifting counter presented as current. The cited release is dated Sep 12 2023 (not Aug) and itself says the user base 'is expected to surpass the four million monthly user mark during the upcoming holiday season'. Chasing the live figure is pointless, so the fix is a date: the label and asOf now pin it to Sep 2023.

udiscmetrics[courses mapped worldwide]

was15,205

now17,000+

15,205 was correct for its source (the 2024 Growth Report says verbatim 'The precise number of disc golf courses as of publication is 15,205') but that is a 2023-era count. udisc.com now prints '17,000+ courses / 2M+ players / 104M+ rounds played' - confirmed in the rendered DOM. Same measure, current value, dated.

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

craftybasecompany

wasCraftybase

nowStocksmith (ex-Craftybase)

the company renamed. craftybase.com redirects to stocksmith.io, which says "Craftybase to Stocksmith - same team, same software, just a new name".

craftybasedomain

wascraftybase.com

nowstocksmith.io

the product moved domain with the rename

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

zenmaidrivals[ZenMaid].price

wasabout $9/cleaner

now$19-$49/mo

get.zenmaid.com/pricing sells Starter $19/mo, Pro $39/mo, Pro Max $49/mo; confirmed in raw HTML and again in a href-guarded DOM read. The strings 'per cleaner' / 'per user' appear nowhere on the page.

zenmaidmoney_flow

wasSubscribes to ZenMaid at about $9 per cleaner/month

nowSubscribes to a ZenMaid plan: Starter $19/mo (40 appointments), Pro $39/mo or Pro Max $49/mo

per-cleaner pricing is gone from the page; these are the monthly rates the page actually prints

innergyrivals[Innergy].price

wascustom/seat

nowcustom quote

innergy.com/pricing publishes no prices at all (demo-request only) and the cited Practical Founders episode contains the word 'seat' zero times - the per-seat claim has no carrier anywhere

innergymoney_flow

wasPays recurring per-seat subscription -> about $25M ARR

nowPays a recurring subscription, priced by quote (Innergy publishes no pricing) -> about $25M revenue in 2025

'per-seat' is unsupported by any cited page. Also softened ARR to revenue: the Practical Founders page says 'In 2025, the company reached roughly $25M in revenue', not ARR.

coinledgermetrics[users filing]

was500K+

now700,000+

coinledger.io says twice - hero and FAQ - 'Trusted by over 700,000 crypto investors' / 'used by more than 700,000 crypto investors around the globe'. The same homepage still shows a stale '500k users' stat band, so the site contradicts itself; took the higher figure it states twice and relabelled to the site's own wording, since 'trusted by' is a user count, not a count of filings.

coinledgermetrics[users filing].label

wasusers filing

nowcrypto investors served

coinledger.io says twice - hero and FAQ - 'Trusted by over 700,000 crypto investors' / 'used by more than 700,000 crypto investors around the globe'. The same homepage still shows a stale '500k users' stat band, so the site contradicts itself; took the higher figure it states twice and relabelled to the site's own wording, since 'trusted by' is a user count, not a count of filings.

whisplimoney_flow

wasPays $10K-250K/yr per seat, near-zero churn

nowPays $10K-250K/yr per client contract (founder-stated, 2019 interview), near-zero churn

'per seat' is unsupported and implausible - the word 'seat' appears zero times in the Mixergy transcript. Mansotte says: 'if you want to use Whispli today, it's going to cost you anywhere between 10 grand and 250 grand a year.' That is a contract range, not a seat price.

fullbaymoney_flow

wasShop pays $188+/mo per user; Fullbay also earns on integrated parts and payments

nowShop pays from $188/mo per shop (Basic: one location, up to five users, one full user license included; extra users $89/mo); Fullbay also earns on integrated parts and payments

fullbay.com/pricing raw HTML: BASIC $188/Month, PRO $258/Month, ELITE $318/Month are per-account base prices with 'Additional users $89/$109/$119 per Month' - $188 is not a per-user rate

userflowrivals[Userflow].price

was$240/mo

now$500/mo (1K MAU)

raw HTML of userflow.com/pricing carries $500/mo monthly rack rate ($400/mo billed annually) for Adoption Studio incl. 1K MAU; the string $240 appears only as 'save $240/yr' on the Agent plan. No $240/mo tier exists.

userflowmoney_flow

wasThey subscribe by monthly active users: $240/mo up to custom Enterprise

nowThey subscribe by monthly active users: Adoption Studio from $500/mo (1K MAU, or $400/mo billed annually), plus an Agent plan at $100/mo

monthly rack rate confirmed in raw HTML; the page shows no Enterprise tier at all (word 'Enterprise' does not appear), so the old 'up to custom Enterprise' is also dead

poolbrainrivals[Pool Brain].price

was$55/tech/mo

now$50/mo base + $65/tech

Both numbers were stale. poolbrain.com/pricing renders its figures from its own JS (bridge-child/js/site.js), which sets 'var providesAccess = "50"' and 'var eachActiveFieldTechnician = "65"'; the page text reads '/Month ... Unlimited Office Users' and '($65 per tech)'. So the base is $50/mo (unlimited office users), not $10, and per-tech is $65, not $55.

poolbrainmoney_flow

was$55 per tech / month — big fleets pay the most

now$50/mo base (unlimited office users) + $65 per tech / month — big fleets pay the most

Matches the live pricing page: $50 base plus $65 per active field technician.

termageddonmetrics[Partner recurring revenue (Jan 2024)].label

wasPartner recurring revenue (Jan 2024)

nowPartner recurring revenue

The claim is real and on the cited page ('Our Agency Partners have surpassed $1 million/year in recurring revenue!') but the page carries no timestamp at all: the string '2024' appears zero times in its HTML. The '(Jan 2024)' vintage was therefore unverifiable. Removed the false date from the label and replaced it with the as-of date on which the live claim was verified.

skebrivals[Skeb].price

wasabout 10% fee

now9.8% fee (6.8% discounted)

The 10% take rate was our own guess, carried by no cited page. Skeb's official company Medium (medium.com/skeb-jp, published 2023-11-29) states the standard request fee is 9.8%, discounted to 6.8% when conditions are met. An older post proposing an experimental 3.9% service fee is from 2020 and is superseded.

skebmoney_flow

wasSkeb keeps about 10% commission + boost tips

nowSkeb keeps a 9.8% request fee (6.8% if discount conditions are met) + boost tips

Replaces an unsourced round number with the company's own published rate.

tebexmetrics[creators on the platform]

was30,000+ creators on the platform

now(removed)

No page anywhere carries 30,000. On tebex.io the stat counters are Lottie animations: the served HTML literally reads '0K+' next to the label 'Businesses Monetizing' (not creators), and '30,000'/'30000' appear zero times on tebex.io, tebex.io/about, the Tebex docs, or the Forbes piece. Dropping rather than substituting the nearby '$500M paid to creators' figure, which measures something else.

tebexmetrics[sold to Overwolf, 2022]

was£22M

now$29M

The card printed one source's currency under another source's name. Forbes states the price only in dollars ('has been acquired by Overwolf for $29 million'); the strings '£22' and '£29' appear zero times on it. The GBP figure came from the TechBlast interview, which now redirects to businesscloud.co.uk/news/ and no longer exists. Aligned the value to the currency the named source actually prints.

hypefuryrivals[Hypefury].price

was$29-199/mo

now$6/mo ($5/mo billed yearly)

Hypefury collapsed to a single plan. Its own pricing page markup reads 'Essentials ... $ 6 /month ... 1 Channel', with a Monthly/Yearly toggle, and the page's own meta description states: 'We only have one simple pricing plan: $6/month or $5/month if billed yearly.' The strings '$29' and '$199' appear zero times on the page. $6 is the monthly rack rate; $5 is the annual rate.

hypefurymoney_flow

wasCreator pays $29-199/mo subscription

nowCreator pays $6/mo ($5/mo billed yearly)

Same dead tiers: the cited pricing page now shows one plan at $6/month.

geoguessrmetrics[registered players]

was80M+

now100M+

The string '80 million' appears on no cited page and zero times in geoguessr.com's HTML; Wikipedia's only figure is '40 million player accounts' by July 2022. GeoGuessr's own homepage now prints, literally, 'Join 100 million players today!'. Updated to the sourced company figure, relabelled to show it is a company marketing claim rather than an audited registration count, and dated.

geoguessrmetrics[registered players].label

wasregistered players

nowplayers (company claim)

The string '80 million' appears on no cited page and zero times in geoguessr.com's HTML; Wikipedia's only figure is '40 million player accounts' by July 2022. GeoGuessr's own homepage now prints, literally, 'Join 100 million players today!'. Updated to the sourced company figure, relabelled to show it is a company marketing claim rather than an audited registration count, and dated.

storeganisemetrics[facilities on platform]

was1,300+

now1,200+

No company page carries any facility count: storeganise.com/about has no metrics and the homepage says only 'Trusted by thousands of self-storage facilities in 50+ countries'. The single page that prints a number is Inside Self-Storage (Oct 6, 2025): 'being employed by more than 1,200 facilities on six continents'. Corrected 1,300+ to 1,200+ and relabelled the source from 'company' to the press outlet that carries it.

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

sharetriberivals[Sharetribe].price

was$39-299/mo

nowBuild $39/mo; live plans $139-389/mo (annual billing: $99-299/mo)

TRAP 3. sharetribe.com/pricing has no monthly/annual toggle at all: it shows Build $39, Lite $99, Pro $199, Extend $299, each live plan tagged 'billed yearly', so the published column IS the annual rate and the card copied it. Sharetribe's own pricing changelog prints both columns in raw HTML (Oct 2025 change): 'Plan Price/month (monthly) Price/month (annual) Build $39 - Lite $139 $99 Pro $259 $199 Extend $389 $299'. True monthly ceiling is $389/mo, not $299 (about 1.3x).

sharetribemoney_flow

wasFounder pays $39-299/mo plus a small per-transaction fee, becoming recurring MRR to Sharetribe.

nowFounder pays $39-389/mo month-to-month ($39-299/mo if billed yearly) plus a small per-transaction fee ($0.19 or less per initiated transaction above the plan's free allowance), becoming recurring MRR to Sharetribe.

Same annual-column error as the price row. The per-transaction fee wording is confirmed on the pricing page ('Additional transactions $0.19 or less per initiated transaction').

sharetribemetrics[VC buyback, 2018]

was$1.2M

nowEUR 1.1M+

The string '1.2M' appears on no page anywhere: not in the cited Sharetribe 'democratically governed' post (checked its rendered text: it mentions the 2018 steward-ownership switch and team members buying investor shares, but no amount) and not in the Starter Story raw HTML. What is sourced: Invesdor's release, dated WED, MAY 16, 2018, prints 'raised EUR 1.1M+' from 42 countries; the founder says on Starter Story 'We raised more than $1M through crowdfunding and used a big part of it to buy back the shares of our original VC investors'. So the buyback amount itself was never published, only the raise. Retitled the tile to the fact that has a source, and pointed it at the page that prints it. $1.2M was an unsourced EUR-to-USD conversion.

sharetribemetrics[VC buyback, 2018].label

wasVC buyback, 2018

nowcrowdfunding raise, 2018

The string '1.2M' appears on no page anywhere: not in the cited Sharetribe 'democratically governed' post (checked its rendered text: it mentions the 2018 steward-ownership switch and team members buying investor shares, but no amount) and not in the Starter Story raw HTML. What is sourced: Invesdor's release, dated WED, MAY 16, 2018, prints 'raised EUR 1.1M+' from 42 countries; the founder says on Starter Story 'We raised more than $1M through crowdfunding and used a big part of it to buy back the shares of our original VC investors'. So the buyback amount itself was never published, only the raise. Retitled the tile to the fact that has a source, and pointed it at the page that prints it. $1.2M was an unsourced EUR-to-USD conversion.

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

4dayweekmoney_flow

wasConvert visitors into a 500K-signup newsletter

nowConvert visitors into a newsletter: about 500K lifetime signups, about 100K active

same correction - the asset being sold to advertisers is the 100K active list

4dayweekmetrics[newsletter signups].label

wasnewsletter signups

nowlifetime signups (about 100K active)

the label lies, not the number. Founder: 'I'm almost at half a million sign ups to the newsletter lifetime' but 'the newsletter goes out twice a week to about 100,000 people' - a reader takes 500K as the live list when it is 5x the real one

vendoorivals[Vendoo].price

was$9-150/mo

now$14.99-59.99/mo

vendoo.co/pricing has three paid tiers: Starter $14.99, Growth $29.99, Pro $59.99 monthly ($12.49/$24.99/$49.99 billed yearly). Nothing on the page costs $9 or $150

vendoomoney_flow

wasSeller pays monthly, priced by listing volume

nowSeller pays $14.99-59.99/mo; tiers differ by features, items are unlimited

every paid tier on the live page says 'Unlimited Items'; tiers separate on AI enhancement, bulk actions and marketplace sharing, not on listing count

vendoometrics[marketplaces]

was10

now10+

the cited /pricing page never prints '10' - it says 'All Marketplaces' and '6 marketplaces' for offers. The homepage carries 'crosslist your inventory across 10+ marketplaces', so the tile is re-pointed to the page that actually states it

vendoometrics[items listed]

was26M+

now78M+

live counter; the homepage counter reads 78 'Million Listings Created' (confirmed in raw HTML). The 26M+ on /about is stale first-party copy

optmyzrmetrics[ad accounts linked]

was430K+

now430,000+

correct but unlinked; the page states 'Ad Accounts Connected: 430,000+'

optmyzrmetrics[ad spend run yearly]

was$5.3B

now$5.39B

the page prints 'Total Ad Spend Managed: $5.39 billion' under 'Usage Metrics (2025)' - it never says yearly, so the label claimed a time period the source does not support; value made exact and linked

optmyzrmetrics[ad spend run yearly].label

wasad spend run yearly

nowad spend managed

the page prints 'Total Ad Spend Managed: $5.39 billion' under 'Usage Metrics (2025)' - it never says yearly, so the label claimed a time period the source does not support; value made exact and linked

nomadlistrivals[Nomad List].price

wasdata + community + membership

nowone-time $19.99 Lite / $119 Full

nomadlist.com now redirects to nomads.com, which sells ONE-TIME memberships (Lite $19.99, Full $119) - not the lifetime/annual framing the card implied

nomadlistmoney_flow

wasLifetime / annual membership + spin-offs

nowOne-time membership ($19.99 / $119) + spin-offs

the live site prices both tiers as a single one-time payment, with no annual option shown

papermarkrivals[Papermark].price

wasfree + $39-199/mo

nowfree + EUR 24-99/mo

papermark.com/pricing bills in EUR: Free 0 / Pro 24 / Business 59 / Data Rooms 99 per month. No $39 or $199 tier exists on the page

papermarkmoney_flow

wasTeams pay $39-199/mo, flat

nowTeams pay EUR 24-99/mo, flat

matches the live pricing page's currency and tiers

papermarkmetrics[GitHub stars]

was6.9K

now8.8K

live counter; GitHub API reports stargazers_count 8,793, not 6.9K

papermarkmetrics[companies]

was27K

now60,000+

live counter drifted; the homepage now reads 'TRUSTED BY 60,000+ GLOBAL COMPANIES', not 27K

missiverivals[Missive].price

was$12-48/seat

now$18-45/seat mo ($14-36 yearly)

missiveapp.com/pricing defaults to the YEARLY column ($14/$24/$36 per user, '20% off'). I clicked the toggle: the monthly rates are $18/$30/$45. Neither end of '$12-48' exists on the page

missivemoney_flow

was$12-48 per seat per month recurs

now$18-45 per seat per month recurs ($14-36 if billed yearly)

live pricing page, both billing columns read directly from the rendered DOM

missivemetrics[customers]

was3,700

now4,500+

same episode states 'more than 4,500 customers' and 30,000 users, vs the card's stale 3,700

missivemetrics[ARR (self-funded)]

was$6M

now$8M+

the card's own second source (ep 806, Nov 2025) has the same founder at '$8 million in ARR'; the $6M came from an older podcast

laravelshiftrivals[Laravel Shift].price

was$19-39/shift

now$9-39/shift

laravelshift.com publishes 'Pay As You Go: $9 to $39 per individual Shift' - the entry price is $9, not $19

laravelshiftmoney_flow

wasDev pays $19-39 per shift, or subscribes

nowDev pays $9-39 per Shift, or subscribes (Shifty plans from $99/yr)

vendor site: $9-$39 per Shift; subscription 'Shifty' plans start at $99 per year for unlimited Shifts

anrokrivals[Anrok].price

wasbase + about 0.25%

now$100/market/mo + custom

anrok.com/pricing publishes a flat per-market fee ('Starter $100 per market / month', Custom 'scales with your total transaction volume'). No percentage fee appears anywhere on the page - the 0.25% was Sacra's third-party read, not a company price

anrokmoney_flow

wasCharges a base fee + about 0.25% of taxable sales

nowCharges a flat fee per market per month ($100/market to start; Custom scales with volume)

matches Anrok's live pricing page, which states 'Anrok charges a flat fee per market per month'

anrokmetrics[customer sales taxed].label

wascustomer sales taxed

nowcustomer revenue/mo tracked

the Series C page says Anrok 'examined $1.4 billion of monthly revenue' across its customer base - that is revenue tracked, not sales taxed; the same page says only 20% to 51%+ of revenue is subject to tax, so the old label overstated the figure by 2x to 5x

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

astrobinmetrics[astrophotographers]

was20K+

now20,000+

same page prints '20,000+ astrophotographers' verbatim; the old citation pointed at an About page that only says 'over 10,000 active members daily'

astrobinmetrics[images hosted]

was1M+

now1,000,000+

real but unlinked: welcome.astrobin.com/about carries no counts, but welcome.astrobin.com now redirects to app.astrobin.com/about/features, which prints '1,000,000+ images' verbatim

avalarametrics[customers (2023)]

was43,000+

now41,000+

no founder page carries 43,000+; Avalara's live About page says '41000+ customers'. The year in the label is dropped in favour of an asOf date.

avalarametrics[customers (2023)].label

wascustomers (2023)

nowcustomers

no founder page carries 43,000+; Avalara's live About page says '41000+ customers'. The year in the label is dropped in favour of an asOf date.

mangoolsrivals[Mangools].price

was$29/mo

now$61/mo, or $37.70/mo billed yearly

live homepage plan table (Basic), monthly toggle vs annual toggle

mangoolsmoney_flow

was$29-98/mo subscriptions, recurring

now$61-141/mo subscriptions, or $37.70-97.70/mo billed yearly

live plans: Basic/Premium/Agency are $61/$81/$141 per month month-to-month, and $37.70/$52.70/$97.70 per month billed yearly. Neither $29 nor $98 is on any page.

mangoolsmetrics[users].label

wasusers

nowcustomers (Latka est.)

Latka carries the figure but flags 'this data is an estimation' and counts customers, not users; the label now says both

mangoolsmetrics[entry price]

was$29/mo

now$61/mo

the $29 was stale and came from VersusStack, not mangools.com. mangools.com/pricing now 404s; the live plan table is on the homepage: Basic is $61/mo month-to-month, or $37.70/mo billed yearly ($452.40/yr). $61 is the true monthly rate - quoting the yearly column as a monthly price is the error being avoided here.

visalistmetrics[visitors / month]

was500K

now600K

the label lied twice over: the 500K was 'Monthly Active Users' in a 2022 Starter Story interview, not visitors, and visalist.io's own live homepage now prints '600K users annually' - so the card's monthly framing overstated the audience by roughly an order of magnitude

visalistmetrics[visitors / month].label

wasvisitors / month

nowusers a year (site)

the label lied twice over: the 500K was 'Monthly Active Users' in a 2022 Starter Story interview, not visitors, and visalist.io's own live homepage now prints '600K users annually' - so the card's monthly framing overstated the audience by roughly an order of magnitude

labstarmoney_flow

wasPays a monthly subscription, per lab, for years

nowPays a monthly subscription, per lab - sold as 3Shape LMS since the 2023 acquisition

labstar.com no longer resolves and the product ships as 3Shape LMS; the card presented it in the present tense as an independent going concern

labstarmetrics[dental labs worldwide]

was600

nowabout 600

the 3Shape press release says 'close to 600 dental labs around the world use LabStar' - 'about 600' matches the source's hedge

voicesrivals[Voices.com].price

was20% fee + membership

nowPremium $499/yr + platform fee

the live memberships page shows only Guest ($0) and Premium ($499); the platform fee rate is not published anywhere on the site

voicesmoney_flow

wasPayment clears SurePay escrow — Voices keeps 20%

nowPayment clears SurePay escrow - Voices keeps a platform fee (rate unpublished)

the 20% rate appears on no first-party page; the site refers only to 'the platform fee' with no number

voicesmoney_flow

wasTalent join, pay $499-$2,999/yr to list

nowTalent join free, or pay $499/yr for Premium

the live memberships page lists two tiers only: Guest $0 and Premium $499. No $2,999 tier is shown.

voicesmetrics[cut per hire]

was20% cut per hire

now(removed)

no voices.com page carries 20% - not the memberships page, not the Getting Paid page (I opened both; neither prints any percentage). The one cited source that gives a rate, SaaS Club, says 10%, so re-citing 20% anywhere would be laundering.

komootrivals[Komoot].price

wasonce or $5/mo

nowPremium GBP 4.99/mo or 59.99/yr

road.cc (cited) prints Premium at GBP 4.99/month or 59.99/year; one-off map unlocks are no longer an option for new accounts

komootmoney_flow

wasMap sales + subscriptions = about $54M a year

nowPremium subscriptions plus legacy map sales = about EUR 50M a year (2024)

matches the Mainsights figure and drops our unsourced USD conversion

komootmoney_flow

wasThey unlock map regions once, or buy Premium

nowNew accounts now need an active Premium subscription (one-off map unlocks ended Feb 2025)

road.cc quotes komoot: accounts that had not purchased or unlocked a maps product before end of Feb 2025 require an active Premium subscription

komootmetrics[2025 sale price]

wasabout $324M

nowabout EUR 300M (reported)

the official release and BikeRadar both say terms were undisclosed. Business Insider does print 'der Kaufpreis bei rund 300 Millionen Euro' attributed to manager magazin, so the figure is reported, not disclosed - and the '$324M' USD conversion was ours, not any source's.

komootmetrics[2024 revenue]

wasabout $54M

nowabout EUR 50M

no page carries '$54M' - that was our own EUR-to-USD conversion. Mainsights, already cited, carries '2024 revenues of EUR 50m'. Stated in the currency the source uses.

kleometrics[founder followers]

was585K

now589K

live homepage now sums to 589K (Jake Ward 185K + Lara Acosta 310K + Rob Hoffman 80K + Cam Trew 14K); this is a drifting counter, so it is dated rather than chased

cattlemaxrivals[CattleMax].price

was$144-636/yr

nowfrom $144/yr (billed yearly)

the live pricing page shows Commercial from $12/mo billed yearly ($144/yr) and Registered from $16/mo; the $636 ceiling is on no page. Large-herd plans sit on separate pages and start at $80/mo (Commercial) and $95/mo (Registered) billed yearly, so no single ceiling is printed.

cattlemaxmoney_flow

wasPays annual plan, $144-636/yr

nowPays annual plan, from $144/yr, rising with herd size

the $144 floor is on the pricing page; the $636 ceiling is not printed anywhere and tier prices sit behind a herd-size selector

cattlemaxmetrics[ranches]

was8,000+ ranches

now(removed)

no CattleMax page carries 8,000+; the homepage and the cited american-cattlemen page say only 'thousands of farms and ranches'. The 80,000+ newsletter figure on the site counts readers, not ranches, so it is not a substitute.

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

pinboardmetrics[Paying subscribers]

wasabout 20K Paying subscribers

now(removed)

no cited page carries about 20K. Boring Cash Cow (the source of the $212K figure) gives no subscriber count at all; Wikipedia has 16,000 users (Dec 2010) and 25,000 registered users (Oct 2011) — different metric, different decade — and History of the Web has 16,000 subscribers. Dropped rather than laundered into one of those

rtafleetmetrics[government fleets served].label

wasgovernment fleets served

nowfleets served

the label lied, not the number: rtafleet.com/about prints '1200 +' fleets powered, with no 'government' qualifier — the site lists government alongside education, food and beverage, and passenger transit. 'Government' was the card's addition

resimplirivals[REsimpli].price

was$149-599/mo

now$199-849/mo (yearly: $149-599)

resimpli.com/pricing defaults to the YEARLY toggle. The page's own data attributes carry both columns: Basic 149 yearly / 199 monthly, Pro 299 / 399, Enterprise 599 / 849. The card was quoting the annual column as the monthly rate

resimplimoney_flow

wasCharges $149-599/mo — plus a margin on the skip traces, mail and calls run inside it

nowCharges $199-849/mo month-to-month ($149-599/mo if billed yearly) — plus a margin on the skip traces, mail and calls run inside it

same annual-column-as-monthly error; both columns now stated so a reader cannot act on the wrong one

pdfaimetrics[paid for the code]

was$20K paid for the code

now(removed)

$20K is our own arithmetic ($60K / 3, from the LinkedIn post 'crossed $60k... 3x what I paid') sitting in a slot labelled 'founder'. No page discloses the acquisition price: the SaaS Starter Stack interview does not state it, and the cited Starter Story piece says the domain alone cost $9,899 — a different thing. Dropped rather than re-cited to the adjacent $9,899

janeapprivals[Jane App].price

was$54-99/mo

nowCAD $54-99/mo

jane.app/pricing prints 'CAD $54 / month' (Balance), 'CAD $79' (Practice), 'CAD $99' (Thrive) — the card printed CAD as bare dollars next to a USD ARR figure

janeappmoney_flow

wasAdds practitioners (+$5/mo) and add-ons: AI Scribe $15, insurance billing

nowAdds practitioners (rate shown only inside Jane's calculator) and add-ons: AI Scribe CAD $15/mo per practitioner, Insurance Billing CAD $20/mo + $5 per extra full-time practitioner

the '+$5/mo' was never the per-practitioner base rate — that $5 belongs to the Insurance Billing add-on ($20/month + $5 / $2.50 per additional full / part-time practitioner). The base per-practitioner rate is not printed on the pricing page at all, so the card now says so instead of inventing one

janeappmoney_flow

wasClinic subscribes, flat rate $54-99/mo

nowClinic subscribes, flat rate CAD $54-99/mo

Jane's pricing page is denominated in CAD

janeappmetrics[practitioners]

was240K+

now200,000+

no jane.app page carries a practitioner count — jane.app/story says only 'thousands of practitioners worldwide' and the homepage gives no count. The cited Techcouver piece is the page that prints it: 'more than 200,000 practitioners across 50,000 clinics in Canada, the U.S., and the U.K. use Jane.' Same metric, correct number, real source

quiverquantmetrics[paying at $30/mo].label

waspaying at $30/mo

nowpaying subscribers

the number (5,000+) is the source's; the price baked into the label is stale and contradicted the card's own money_flow. quiverquant.com prints '$25.00 / month' for Premium today, so the label asserted a price no page carries. The IB Madison article itself would not open (403 to WebFetch and to curl, and the archive is unreachable), so I changed nothing about the value or the source — only removed the stale price claim from the sentence around it.

healthchecksmetrics[solo & profitable]

was9 yrs

now11 yrs

the about page now says 11 years, still a one-man company (Peteris Caune)

healthchecksmetrics[paying customers]

was652

now957

the about page prints '957 accounts' today, up from the 652 in the Jul-2024 post

healthchecksmetrics[MRR (Jul 2024)]

was$14,043

now$21,200

healthchecks.io/about prints a live '21 200 USD' MRR. The Jul-2024 blog snapshot is two years stale; the fix is a live figure plus a date, not another frozen year in the label

healthchecksmetrics[MRR (Jul 2024)].label

wasMRR (Jul 2024)

nowMRR

healthchecks.io/about prints a live '21 200 USD' MRR. The Jul-2024 blog snapshot is two years stale; the fix is a live figure plus a date, not another frozen year in the label

123sheetsrivals[123 Sheets].price

was$50/yr, bridge

nowGBP 19.75/yr, bridge

123sheets.com/vat.aspx and /self-employed.aspx both print 'Price Per Taxpayer Per Year: £19.75' (+VAT) for a single taxpayer; the card's $50/yr is roughly double and appears on no page

123sheetsmoney_flow

wasAbout $50/yr per taxpayer, recurring

nowGBP 19.75/yr + VAT per taxpayer (first year half-price), recurring

that is the figure the pricing widget prints for a single taxpayer; the site sells in GBP, so the card's dollar figure was both wrong and the wrong currency. Note: the card's revenue estimate was built on the $50 figure (35,000 x price) and is now unsupported arithmetic — that sentence should be withdrawn separately, it is outside this patch's fields.

coffeecontractsmetrics[paying members]

was5,400 paying members

now(removed)

no openable page carries 5,400. The only page that ever did was the SUCCESS.com profile, which now 404s. Of the card's cited sources: Starter Story says 'we've helped over 7,000 real estate professionals' (a cumulative, different metric, Dec 2021), the MemberMouse episode gives no member count, and coffeecontracts.com/about gives none either. Dropping rather than swapping in the 7,000.

ownerrezrivals[OwnerRez].price

was$40+/mo flat

now$88+/mo flat

ownerrez.com/pricing prints 'For properties: $88/month' as the entry price, with a sliding scale that gets cheaper per property as you add more

ownerrezmoney_flow

wasHost pays a flat $40+/mo per property — no cut of bookings

nowHost pays a flat $88+/mo, sliding cheaper per property as the portfolio grows — no cut of bookings

current entry price is $88/month, more than double the card's $40; the page still confirms 'No setup fees, booking fees, or contracts'

wynterrivals[Wynter].price

wasfrom $6,990/yr

nowfrom $20,000/yr

wynter.com/pricing now prints Pro $20,000/yr (20,000 credits), Elite $40,000/yr, Wynter Black $100,000/yr, plus pay-as-you-go per test. There is no Lite plan and no $6,990/yr entry point anywhere on the page.

wyntermoney_flow

wasB2B team buys a plan or credits (Lite from $6,990/yr)

nowB2B team buys a plan or credits (Pro from $20,000/yr, 20,000 credits)

the Lite/$6,990 tier is gone from wynter.com/pricing; the entry subscription is Pro at $20,000/yr

subscribrmoney_flow

wasCreator subscribes at $49-300/mo

nowCreator starts at $7; plans billed annually

subscribr.ai/pricing redirects to the homepage, whose only price is 'Start for $7 today - cancel anytime in the first 7 days', with annual billing only. No $49-300 monthly tiers or plan names appear anywhere on the site

storecoverivals[Storecove].price

wasVolume-based

nowquote only (no public pricing)

storecove.com/pricing 404s, and start-now / MyStorecove FAQ / homepage print no rates - the site asks you to request a consult

storecovemoney_flow

wasStorecove charges per document + tiers

nowStorecove sells API access; pricing on request (no public price page)

no reachable first-party page carries a per-document rate or tier table; the pricing URL returns HTTP 404

storecovemetrics[Employees (2026)]

was13 Employees (2026)

now(removed)

labelled 'tracxn', which the card never cites. Crunchbase (the only cited page that would carry a headcount) 403s in WebFetch and serves a Cloudflare challenge in a real browser, and no first-party Storecove page prints a team size. Unverifiable as printed

woodpeckerrivals[Woodpecker].price

was$29/mo

nowfrom $7 per 100 prospects

no $29/mo plan exists on the live pricing page - it is usage-based now; $29/mo is the LinkedIn add-on price, not the plan

woodpeckermoney_flow

wasUsers pay monthly per connected inbox — about $5.5M in 2024 revenue, down 16.6% YoY.

nowUsers pay per contacted prospect, from $7.00 per 100 — about $5.5M in 2024 revenue, down 16.6% YoY.

the model described is gone: woodpecker.co/pricing charges '$7.00 per 100 Contacted prospects', includes unlimited email accounts, and sells extra inboxes as add-ons ($6/mo per email address)

iubendarivals[iubenda].price

wasfrom $5.99/mo

nowfrom $6.99/mo ($5.99 billed yearly)

same monthly/annual toggle - the live pricing page shows Essentials $6.99 monthly vs $5.99 yearly

iubendametrics[per month, per site]

wasfrom $5.99

nowfrom $6.99

$5.99 is the yearly-billed rate read as a monthly one. Live page: Essentials is $6.99/mo billed monthly, or $5.99/mo billed yearly

iubendametrics[customers at 2021 exit].label

wascustomers at 2021 exit

nowcustomers at 2022 exit

the number is right, the sentence around it is not - the team.blue release that carries 'about 80,000 customers today' is dated 14 February 2022, and DLA Piper dates the acquisition to Feb 2022

publisherrocketmetrics[est. lifetime sales]

was$10M+ est. lifetime sales

now(removed)

our own arithmetic, and its base was stale (it multiplied by the old 'about $100' price while the live price is $199). No page anywhere carries a lifetime sales figure - dropping rather than re-basing a guess

inflectrarivals[Inflectra].price

was$131+/mo

nowfrom $134.26/mo

stale - the live price list shows SpiraTest (Cloud, 3-user) at $134.26/month, SpiraTeam at $176.29 and SpiraPlan at $224.46

sparktoromoney_flow

wasRand's marketing audience -> 200 free signups/day

nowRand's marketing audience -> about 1,200 free signups/week

the Year 3 retrospective, the only cited page with a signup figure, says 'about 1,200 sign up for new, free SparkToro accounts each week' (about 170/day). 200/day is on no cited page

toptalmetrics[Paid to talent (GMV)]

was$5B+ Paid to talent (GMV)

now(removed)

labelled 'company' but no page carries $5B+ - toptal.com/about prints only 2,700,000+ applications, 25,000+ clients, 64,000+ engagements and 10,000,000+ days engaged; Wikipedia gives revenue and the $1.4M seed but no GMV. Nothing adjacent substituted

worldanvilrivals[World Anvil].price

was$0-25/mo · wiki+maps

nowfree, $7-34/mo (yearly $4.50-25)

the $4.50/$8.25/$25.00 figures on worldanvil.com/pricing are the annual column ('billed annually'); flipping the toggle to Monthly shows US$7.00 / US$12.00 / US$34.00 per month

worldanvilmoney_flow

wasUpgrade to Guild membership $5-25/mo

nowUpgrade to Guild membership $7-34/mo

same annual/monthly mixup - Guild tiers (Master/Grandmaster/Sage) bill at $7/$12/$34 monthly, or $4.50-25 per month if paid yearly

worldanvilmetrics[VC raised]

was$0 VC raised

now(removed)

labelled Tracxn, which is not a cited source; Companies House (the one funding-adjacent source cited) shows only incorporation and active status, no funding figure. No reachable page states $0 raised

worldanvilmetrics[worlds built]

was5M+ worlds built

now(removed)

no page carries a worlds-created count - the FAQ (the cited carrier), the homepage and the pricing page print no such figure. Not substituting the 3.5M user count, which is a different thing

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%) (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices) (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

mentorcruisemetrics[mentees, 171 countries]

was51K+

now56,000+

the cited stats page now reads '56,000+ Mentees' and '173 Countries'. Both the number and the country count in the label had drifted; dated so it stays true.

mentorcruisemetrics[mentees, 171 countries].label

wasmentees, 171 countries

nowmentees, 173 countries

the cited stats page now reads '56,000+ Mentees' and '173 Countries'. Both the number and the country count in the label had drifted; dated so it stays true.

brewwrivals[Breww].price

wasfrom about $38/mo

nowfrom $34.99/mo

breww.com/pricing prices the entry tier (up to 200 hL/yr) at US$34.99/month (GBP 29.99). The old $38 was Capterra's GBP figure run through a stale FX rate.

brewwmoney_flow

wasBrewery pays monthly (from about $38), scaling with volume - recurring revenue

nowBrewery pays monthly (from $34.99), scaling with volume - recurring revenue

matches the live first-party pricing page.

brewwmetrics[countries]

was10 countries

now(removed)

no Breww page carries a country count. The homepage has none, there is no /about page, and the only '10 countries' text on the domain belongs to a customer case study about someone else's company. Dropping rather than substituting a nearby number.

brewwmetrics[breweries]

was750+

now800+

the homepage now says 'Trusted by over 800 breweries'; 750+ is stale. Dated, because it is a counter that will move again.

gumroadrivals[Gumroad].price

wasFlat 10% + $0.50 / sale

now10% + $0.50 direct; 30% via Discover

gumroad.com/pricing states '10% + $0.50 per transaction' for your own links but '30% per transaction when new customers find and buy from you through our discover marketplace'. There is no flat rate.

gumroadmoney_flow

wasGumroad keeps a flat 10% + $0.50 of every sale

nowGumroad keeps 10% + $0.50 on your own links, and 30% on sales it sends you via Discover

the live pricing page prices the two channels differently; 'flat... of every sale' understates the marketplace take by 3x.

predictwindmoney_flow

wasSell $29-499/yr subscriptions to 300k+ sailors

nowSell $29-499/yr subscriptions to 1.7M+ marine users

same first-party correction as the tile.

predictwindmetrics[users worldwide]

was300k+

now1.7M+

'reported' named no reporter, and 300k+ appears on no PredictWind page. The live pricing page says 'Join 1.7 Million+ marine users worldwide' - first-party, so I used that and dated it.

oddsjamrivals[OddsJam].price

was$39-500/mo

now$6.60-$20/day (billed monthly)

oddsjam.com/subscribe now bills per day, not per month: on monthly billing Sharp Money is $6.60/day and Platinum $20/day (annual billing: $5.40/day and $13.60/day). No $39/mo entry tier exists any more.

oddsjammoney_flow

wasBettors pay $39-500/mo to rent the edge

nowBettors pay per day to rent the edge: $6.60-$20/day, billed monthly

matches the live subscribe page, which prices by the day.

oddsjammetrics[2024 revenue].label

was2024 revenue

now2024 revenue (expected)

the tile named a 'GAMB filing' the card never cites. The cited iGaming Business piece does carry the number, but as a forward-looking figure: 'Odds Holdings expects to post $26 million in revenue' - so the label now says expected.

biznessappsrivals[GoodBarber].price

wasfrom $25/mo

nowfrom 30 EUR/mo

goodbarber.com/pricing now shows 'Starting from 30 EUR/month' for its cheapest (Content) plan; $25 is stale, and the page prices in euros, not dollars.

jobtreadmoney_flow

wasAdds internal crew at $4-20 per user; subs and clients free

nowAdds internal crew at $5-20 per user monthly ($4-16 on annual billing); subs and clients free

live pricing page: monthly per-user tiers are $20 / $15 / $10 / $5; the annual column is $16 / $12 / $8 / $4. The old '$4-20' took the floor from the annual column and the ceiling from the monthly one.

planningcentermoney_flow

wasMonthly subscriptions + giving-processing fees across 80k churches

nowMonthly subscriptions + giving-processing fees across 90,000+ churches

matches the corrected tile and the /about FAQ.

planningcentermetrics[active churches]

was80k+

now90,000+

the cited /about page contradicts itself: its 'By the numbers' block still says '80,000+ active churches' while its own FAQ on the same page says 'Over 90,000 churches trust Planning Center'. Took the higher first-party figure and dated it. I could not open any page carrying '100,000+', so I did not use that number.

iclassprometrics[class registrations / year]

wasmillions

now100M+

the label lied about the number's timeframe. No page anywhere carries 'millions per year'; iClassPro's own homepage prints 'Over 100 Million Class & Camp Registrations', which is a cumulative lifetime total, not an annual rate. Same quantity, correctly framed against the first-party page that prints it, and dated because it is a running counter

iclassprometrics[class registrations / year].label

wasclass registrations / year

nowclass & camp registrations, all-time

the label lied about the number's timeframe. No page anywhere carries 'millions per year'; iClassPro's own homepage prints 'Over 100 Million Class & Camp Registrations', which is a cumulative lifetime total, not an annual rate. Same quantity, correctly framed against the first-party page that prints it, and dated because it is a running counter

holistiplanmoney_flow

wasFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count

nowFirm pays $749-$15,499/yr, tiered by household count (monthly billing also offered; annual saves 16%)

the live pricing page still shows the $749/yr (30 households) to $15,499/yr (750 households) ladder, but billing is no longer annual-only - it now also sells monthly (e.g. $75/mo at the entry tier), with a 16% annual discount

hiddenleversmoney_flow

wasHiddenLevers books recurring ARR at 51% margin

nowHiddenLevers booked recurring ARR at 51% margin; the brand is now Orion Risk Intelligence

past tense plus the rename, so the card states the product's current status instead of implying it is still sold

hiddenleversmoney_flow

wasAdvisors run macro stress-tests in reviews and proposals

nowAdvisors ran macro stress-tests in reviews and proposals

same: this is an exit story (Orion, 2021), so the flow is history, not a live offer

hiddenleversmoney_flow

wasAn advisory firm buys a HiddenLevers subscription

nowAn advisory firm bought a HiddenLevers subscription

the brand no longer exists - hiddenlevers.com now reads 'HiddenLevers is Now Orion Risk Intelligence'. Present tense asserts a product a reader cannot buy

goproposalrivals[GoProposal].price

was£100+/mo per user

now£70-225/mo (excl VAT)

the live pricing page prints four tiers - Solo £70, Basic £100, then £140 and £225, each 'per month / excl VAT'. The floor is £70, not £100, and the tiers are gated by proposal volume and users (Solo = '5 Proposals', '1 User'), so it is not a per-user rate

goproposalmoney_flow

wasFirm pays £100+/mo ($130) per user

nowFirm pays £70-225/mo (excl VAT), tiered by proposals and users

same two errors as the price row: wrong floor and a per-user unit the pricing page does not use

taxjarrivals[TaxJar].price

was$19-99+/mo

now$39-99/mo

the live pricing page prints Starter '$39 / mo' and Professional '$99 / mo'. The $19 entry price is gone - it is the 2019 figure, which is exactly what the cited VentureBeat article from that year quotes ('anywhere from a reasonable $19 per month')

taxjarmoney_flow

wasSeller pays a monthly SaaS fee ($19-99+/mo)

nowSeller pays a monthly SaaS fee ($39-99/mo)

same stale entry price as the price row; live page says $39 minimum

screenshotonemetrics[active developers]

was1,000+ active developers

now(removed)

'reviews' is not a source on this card and no page carries 1,000+. The founder's site says '800+ Customers' - a different quantity (customers, not active developers) from a different figure, so relabelling it would be a substitution, not a fix. Dropped

sumsubmetrics[clients, 220+ countries].label

wasclients, 220+ countries

nowclients

the 4,000+ half is real - sumsub.com/pricing prints 'Trusted by 4000+ clients' and the homepage prints '4000+ clients trust Sumsub' - but no Sumsub page carries a 220+ country claim (the homepage and pricing page were both opened; the only '220' on the site is a footer data-protection registration number). The label is cut back to the half the pages support

wallsiorivals[Walls.io].price

wasfrom about $215/mo

nowfrom $270/mo ($215/mo billed annually)

the pricing page loads with the YEARLY toggle preselected, and $215 is printed as 'PER MONTH (billed annually)'. Clicking 'Monthly payment' shows the real rack rate: Professional $270/mo, Premium $455/mo (vs $360 annually). The card quoted the annual column as if it were the monthly price

wallsiomoney_flow

wasPays a subscription from about $215/mo per wall

nowPays a subscription from $270/mo per wall ($215/mo billed annually)

same toggle error as the price row

scrapingbeemetrics[at 2025 exit].label

wasat 2025 exit

nowARR at exit

the TinySeed page named by the tile carries no ARR at all (only 'thousands of customers' and an '8-figure all-cash deal'); the SFTROU episode is the carrier ('5 million ARR'). The year is removed rather than corrected because the cited pages contradict each other: ScrapingBee's own announcement post is dated 19 January 2026, while the podcast is from 2025. Asserting either year would go past the evidence

uncatmetrics[launched on QuickBooks store]

was2020 launched on QuickBooks store

now(removed)

uncat.com states no launch year anywhere (/about and /pricing 404), and the QuickBooks App Store listing was opened and shows no launch date either - only '$9/client/month after the trial'. The year is on no page, so the tile goes

taskmagicmoney_flow

wasUsage-based subscriptions: 8,000 customers, then a mid-7-figure sale

nowUsage-based subscriptions: 7,000+ customers, then a seven-figure sale

8,000 is on no page (NoCode Exits: 'over 7,000'), and 'mid-7-figure' is more precise than any page supports; the Acquire.com episode title says 'seven-figure exit'

taskmagicmetrics[peak monthly rev]

was$400K peak monthly rev

now(removed)

no opened page carries $400K/mo. Starter Story puts TaskMagic at 'Monthly Revenue: $167K'; the only $400K on that page belongs to Poppy AI in its 'Similar Business Ideas' module, so the tile appears to be cross-contamination from another company. Not substituting $167K: that is a snapshot, not a 'peak'

taskmagicmetrics[paying customers]

was8,000

now7,000+

no opened page carries 8,000; NoCode Exits prints 'over 7,000 paying customers' (Starter Story says 'over 6,000'), so the number is corrected down to the one a page actually prints

taskmagicmetrics[total revenue]

was$4M

nowabout $4M

tile was sourced to 'X bio', which we cannot open; the linked NoCode Exits page is the carrier and prints 'almost $4 million revenue', so the value is softened to 'about $4M' and pointed at the page that actually says it

safetyculturemetrics[inspections]

was600M+/yr

now1B+/yr

the cited carrier has moved past the printed number: the homepage now says '1 billion + checks completed a year' (the About page agrees: '1B Checks completed per year'). 600M+/yr was stale against its own source. Label follows the site's own word, 'checks', rather than 'inspections'. Dated, since it is a growing counter

safetyculturemetrics[inspections].label

wasinspections

nowchecks completed/yr

the cited carrier has moved past the printed number: the homepage now says '1 billion + checks completed a year' (the About page agrees: '1B Checks completed per year'). 600M+/yr was stale against its own source. Label follows the site's own word, 'checks', rather than 'inspections'. Dated, since it is a growing counter

metafiltermoney_flow

wasMembers now fund the site directly

nowMembers' direct support now carries the site, with ad revenue still in the mix (Jan 2020: about $30.5K/mo expenses vs about $31.5K/mo income from all sources)

the cited finances post calls member support 'fundamental' but reports income 'from all sources' and still frets over AdSense - so 'members now fund the site' overstates it. For the card body: the site's ownership passed to Jessamyn West in May 2022, it began a transition to non-profit status in Dec 2024 under the MetaFilter Community Foundation, and has seven paid staff as of Aug 2025 (Wikipedia) - the card's picture stops at 2020

metafiltermoney_flow

wasAd views paid the bills (till 2012)

nowAd views paid the bills until the 2012 Google hit

'till 2012' reads as if ads ended; they did not. The Jan 2020 finances post is still tracking AdSense income and worrying it will 'drop somewhat sharply between January and April/May'. 2012 was when ads stopped being enough, not when they stopped

fomorivals[Fomo].price

was$25-250/mo

now$25-149/mo (Starter to Pro; Unlimited custom)

fomo.com/pricing (opened 2026-07) shows Starter $25/mo, Business $75/mo, Pro $149/mo, Unlimited custom. There is no $250 plan - $250 is the Starter ANNUAL price ($250/year), which the card had read as a monthly ceiling. Published monthly ceiling is $149

fomomoney_flow

wasMerchant pays $25-250/mo, recurring

nowMerchant pays $25-149/mo, recurring

same defect: the monthly rack rates top out at $149; $250 is Starter billed yearly

recordjoymoney_flow

wasBolt on paid subscriptions; grow to 20K users, about $1K MRR

nowBolt on paid subscriptions; grow it to about $700 MRR (about $5K lifetime revenue)

the founder's own essay says 'We managed to get the product to about $700 MRR at the time of acquisition' and 'a lifetime revenue of about $5k from the site', and states no user count anywhere. The '20K users / $1K MRR' came from the contradictory Acquire.com interview (which also says a $10K buy and a 2-week close) blended into a card whose other figures follow the essay ($12K buy, 1-month close). Aligned to the single first-party source

construct3metrics[monthly active users]

was200k+

now250K+

'200k+ / 3rd-party' named no party and no page carries it - Starter Story, Wikipedia, Infinite Frontiers and GovTech were all opened and none has an MAU figure. The only openable page printing a monthly-users figure is the Capterra listing: 'Over 250,000 users monthly make & sell thousands of games globally.' Same metric, so the number is corrected to what a real page prints and the carrier is named. Caveat for the card body: it is vendor-supplied listing copy, and IG CloudOps' Scirra case study says 'over 180,000 users worldwide' (not monthly) - treat as a soft figure. construct.net itself returns 403 to both WebFetch and a real browser, so the company's own count could not be checked

standoutcvmetrics[MRR at exit].label

wasMRR at exit

nowMRR, Sept 2025

the cited Indie Hackers post is dated 25 September 2025, not 2026 - so the label's year was wrong, and the post is a pre-exit snapshot ('£40K monthly recurring revenue'), not a figure taken at the exit. Dated to what the carrier actually says

wappalyzermoney_flow

wasFree extension detects tech on 2M+ users' daily browsing

nowFree extension detects tech as its 2.5M+ users browse

same defect as the tile: 2.5M is the total install base per the founder interview, not a daily active count

wappalyzermetrics[daily ext. users]

was2M+

now2.5M+

wappalyzer.com carries no user count on any page (homepage, pricing and technologies all opened). The real carrier is the interview: 'the browser extension, which now has over 2.5M users' - a TOTAL, not a daily figure. The card both mis-attributed the source and turned a lifetime total into a daily number

wappalyzermetrics[daily ext. users].label

wasdaily ext. users

nowextension users (total)

wappalyzer.com carries no user count on any page (homepage, pricing and technologies all opened). The real carrier is the interview: 'the browser extension, which now has over 2.5M users' - a TOTAL, not a daily figure. The card both mis-attributed the source and turned a lifetime total into a daily number

notemetrics[GMV through note]

was$140M GMV through note

now(removed)

no note IR page carries any GMV figure. Both cited IR pages were opened: the business-model page discusses GMV only as a concept in the revenue formula and gives no amount, and the FY25 results post gives none either. The $140M was our own multiplication, and it does not even reconcile. Nothing to link it to, so the tile goes

notemetrics[registered members]

was11.1M

now11.78M

live counter had drifted: the business-model page says 11.78 million registered members as of the end of February 2026; the FY25 results post's 11.14M is what the card was showing. Dated rather than left to rot again

printavorivals[Printavo].price

wasfrom $49/mo

nowLite $109/mo, Standard $244/mo, Premium contact us

printavo.com/pricing (opened 2026-07) prints Lite $109/mo and Standard $244/mo on monthly billing; there is no $49 plan any more

printavomoney_flow

wasPrint shop drowning in spreadsheets subscribes (from $49/mo)

nowPrint shop drowning in spreadsheets subscribes (from $109/mo)

entry price on the live pricing page is $109/mo, 2.2x the $49 the card quoted; a reader could have acted on the stale number

cronometerrivals[Cronometer].price

was$50/yr

now$59.99/yr or $10.99/mo

The live Gold page reads '$4.99 USD per month, billed annually at $59.99' and '$10.99 USD per month, billed monthly'. The card quoted an annual-equivalent as if it were the rate, and understated it.

cronometermoney_flow

wasThey upgrade to Gold (about $50/yr), plus Pro seats for clinics

nowThey upgrade to Gold ($59.99/yr, or $10.99/mo), plus Pro seats for clinics

Same live Gold pricing page; the old figure was stale and low, the direction a reader is most likely to be misled by.

cronometermetrics[nutrients/food]

was82+

now95

'82+' is carried by no cited page: the accurate-databases page says only 'We pull nutrition data from over 10 different trusted sources'. The live homepage states 'Track up to 95 different nutrients and compounds', so both the number and the wording now come from one first-party sentence. Flagging for review: if you consider 'nutrients per food' a different metric from 'nutrients the app tracks', drop this tile instead — do not keep 82.

cronometermetrics[nutrients/food].label

wasnutrients/food

nownutrients tracked (up to)

'82+' is carried by no cited page: the accurate-databases page says only 'We pull nutrition data from over 10 different trusted sources'. The live homepage states 'Track up to 95 different nutrients and compounds', so both the number and the wording now come from one first-party sentence. Flagging for review: if you consider 'nutrients per food' a different metric from 'nutrients the app tracks', drop this tile instead — do not keep 82.

pixtamoney_flow

wasPIXTA keeps 58-78%, pays creators the rest

nowPIXTA keeps about 47-78%, paying creators 22-53% depending on asset type

The old range was our own subtraction from the non-exclusive photo royalty row (22-42%) alone. The live rate card also shows exclusive photos at 30-53% and footage at 40-50%, so on those sale types PIXTA keeps far less than 58-78%.

pixtametrics[Contributors]

was443K+

now450K+

A live counter that had drifted: no page carries 443K; the contributor guide now reads '450,219 contributors'. Dated rather than left to rot again.

angelmatchmoney_flow

wasPays $59-199/mo to unlock contacts and CRM

nowPays $59-349/mo to unlock contacts and CRM

The live pricing page has no $199 tier. Monthly rack rates are Basic $59, Growth $99, Premium $349 (yearly totals $349/$499/$2,099 with 6 months free). The old ceiling understated the top tier by $150/mo — the direction that most misleads a reader who might act on it.

angelmatchmetrics[paying subscribers]

was343

now340

Same live counter: 343 has drifted to '340 active subscriptions'.

angelmatchmetrics[all-time revenue]

was$884K

now$892K

A live Stripe-verified counter that had drifted (card said $884K; page now reads $892,809). Dated so it stays a true claim about a day.

sudowriterivals[Sudowrite].price

was$10-59/mo

now$10-44/mo

The live pricing page shows exactly three paid tiers: Hobby & Student $10, Professional $22, Max $44, each 'per month'. There is no $59 tier in either billing state; yearly is discounted ('Up to 50% off'), so $44 is the top monthly rack rate.

sudowritemoney_flow

wasMonthly credit subscriptions, $10-59/mo — recurring revenue

nowMonthly credit subscriptions, $10-44/mo — recurring revenue

No $59 plan exists on the live pricing page; the top tier is Max at $44/mo.

appsumorivals[AppSumo].price

waskeeps 70-80%

now70-80% (seller-reported, disputed)

AppSumo's own myths post explicitly disputes the 70%+ claim while declining to give a number; the 70-80% figure is only sellers relaying what reps told them.

appsumomoney_flow

wasAppSumo keeps 70-80% of every Select sale; maker gets buyers

nowSellers report AppSumo keeps 70-80% on Select deals (AppSumo disputes it and gives no number); maker gets buyers

Removes an unattributed soft-to-hard promotion: the source is an IndieHackers thread of users repeating sales-rep claims, and the company contests it.

codeablemoney_flow

wasWork ships; Codeable keeps 17.5% from client + 10% from expert

nowWork ships; Codeable keeps a 17.5% service fee from the client

The 10% expert-side cut is carried by no Codeable page; only the 17.5% client fee is first-party.

codeablemetrics[project volume (GMV)].label

wasproject volume (GMV)

nowproject volume (GMV), Feb 2021

The $250K+/mo figure comes from a Cloudways interview dated 1 Feb 2021, when Codeable had 150+ developers and about 12,000 clients. The site now shows 750+ experts and 25K+ customers, so the number is real but describes a business several times smaller. Dating the label makes it a true claim about a time instead of a false one about today.

codeablemetrics[client + dev take]

was17.5% + 10%

now17.5%

The 10% expert-side fee is on NO Codeable page: not the cited help article, not codeable.io/pricing ('17.5% Fixed Fee'), not help.codeable.io 'How does pricing work' ('Your final estimate already includes the 17.5% service charge'). It is attested only by a third-party blogger's account. The verified first-party number is the 17.5% client fee alone.

codeablemetrics[client + dev take].label

wasclient + dev take

nowclient service fee

The 10% expert-side fee is on NO Codeable page: not the cited help article, not codeable.io/pricing ('17.5% Fixed Fee'), not help.codeable.io 'How does pricing work' ('Your final estimate already includes the 17.5% service charge'). It is attested only by a third-party blogger's account. The verified first-party number is the 17.5% client fee alone.

prolificmetrics[active participants]

was200K+

now300,000+

The tile was labelled 'prolific.com' but 200K+ was Sacra's number. The live prolific.com/pricing page says '300,000+ active participants' — the company's own figure now carries the tile.

bankstatementconverterrivals[BankStmtConverter].price

was$30-99/mo · $599/yr

now$30-99/mo · $599/yr (2023 interview)

The site publishes no prices anywhere: /pricing is 404, the homepage shows only tier names (Anonymous/Registered/Subscribe), and /subscribe names a Monthly and an Annual Plan but prints no dollar amounts. The only carrier is the 2023 Founder Reports interview, so the figures are dated rather than presented as today's rack rate.

bankstatementconvertermoney_flow

wasSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr

nowSubscribes for page credits — $30-99/mo or $599/yr (2023 interview; site shows no public prices)

Same reason: no live page carries these numbers, so the vintage is stated instead of implying they are current.

bandcampmetrics[paid to artists & labels to date]

was$1.3B+

now$1.75B+

live first-party counter reads 'Fans have paid artists and independent labels $1.75 billion using Bandcamp, and $15.6 million in the past 30 days alone.' The card's $1.3B+ came from the MBW write-up and is stale by $450M. Dated, because this counter keeps moving.

postbridgerivals[Post Bridge].price

was$9-$27/mo

now$29-$99/mo

live pricing page (monthly toggle) shows $29, $49 and $99 per month. The $9 entry tier is gone and the top tier is 3.7x the carded price - a reader acting on the old row would have been badly misled.

postbridgemoney_flow

wasPays $9-$27/mo subscription to keep publishing

nowPays $29-$99/mo subscription to keep publishing

same live pricing page

wantedlyrivals[Wantedly].price

wasFlat $170-1,300/mo

nowFlat S$169-1,299/mo (Singapore pricing)

the cited pricing page is the Singapore one and quotes Singapore dollars: Lite S$169/mo, Basic S$449/mo, Premium S$1,299/mo. The card converted the digits into plain dollars, reading about 30% high in USD terms - same class of error as Cliniko's.

wantedlymetrics[companies hiring]

was44k+ companies hiring

now(removed)

no page anywhere carries this. Opened the cited help.wantedly.com 'What is Wantedly' page (no company count at all), wantedlyinc.com/en (carries only the 4.5M registered-user line), the IR financials page, and the sg.wantedly.com pricing page - none prints a company count. Dropping rather than substituting the 4.5M user figure, which measures something else.

clinikorivals[Cliniko].price

wasAU$45-395/clinic

nowUS$45-395/clinic

the pricing page states 'Prices are in United States dollars (USD)' next to the $45/$95/$145/$195/$295/$395 bands. The digits were right, the currency was not - and any revenue estimate built on reading these as Australian dollars is off by the AUD/USD rate.

clinikometrics[given to charity]

wasAU$3M+

nownearly AU$2.7M

the card OVERSTATED this one: the charity page reads 'As of March 2025, Cliniko has given just shy of AU$2.7 million to charity.' AU$3M+ is on no Cliniko page.

workwithindiesmetrics[Monthly page views]

was150K

now260k+

the cited about page now reads 'a kind job board (with over 260k monthly page views) and inclusive community (with 45,000 members)' - 150K appears on no page. Opened in a browser and confirmed the sentence.

studioninjarivals[Studio Ninja].price

wasabout $295/yr

now$160-400/yr (USD)

live pricing page, yearly toggle, USD: Starter $160/yr, Pro $270/yr, Master $400/yr. No $295/yr plan exists any more.

studioninjamoney_flow

wasRenews yearly at about $295

nowRenews yearly at $160-400 depending on plan (or $16-40/mo)

same live page; monthly toggle shows Starter $16, Pro $27, Master $40 per month

carrdmetrics[sites hosted]

was4M+

nowabout 4M

'4M+' overstates the source: AJ says Carrd is 'about to cross the 4 million site mark', i.e. just under 4M. The AMA's figure is 2.5M sites, from an earlier date.

mentametrics[registered users]

was40K+

nowabout 100,000

no cited MENTA page carried 40K+. The live about page states 'about 100,000 people now use it, with 7,400 mentors registered' - opened in a browser (JS-rendered; a plain fetch returns an empty shell).

cloudspotrivals[CloudSpot].price

wasFree-$45/mo

nowFree-$50/mo

live pricing page shows Free $0, Entry $7, Lite $17, Pro $34, Unlimited $50/mo - top of the range is $50, not $45

cloudspotmoney_flow

wasCloudSpot earns monthly subs plus a cut of print sales

nowCloudSpot earns monthly subs; the 15% print-sale commission applies only to the Free and Entry plans (Lite, Pro and Unlimited are commission-free)

live pricing page marks Lite/Pro/Unlimited 'Commission-free' - the print-sale cut is a free-tier monetiser, not a blanket second revenue line

cleancloudrivals[CleanCloud].price

was$75-125/mo

now$75-335/mo

live pricing page (monthly view) shows Lite $75/mo, Pro $90/mo, Grow $125/mo, Grow+ $335/mo - the card's range silently dropped the top tier

cleancloudmoney_flow

wasLaundry shop subscribes: $75-125/mo

nowLaundry shop subscribes: $75-335/mo

same: four self-serve tiers run to $335/mo, not $125

cleancloudmetrics[card volume processed].label

wascard volume processed

nowprocessed in transactions

number is real but was unlinked: the 10th-year blog post says 'Over $1 billion processed' in transactions, and the homepage the tile implied carries no such figure. The post says transactions processed, not card volume specifically, so the label is narrowed to match the source.

jetpackmoney_flow

wasPays $36-50 per user / month, annual - recurring firm-wide

nowPays $40-50 per user / month billed annually (+$9/user/mo if billed monthly) - recurring firm-wide

matches the live pricing page: Starter $40, Premium $50, annual billing

jetpackmetrics[accounting pros]

was6,000+

now6K (est)

the tile was tagged 'company' but jetpackworkflow.com says only 'Thousands of accountants and bookkeepers'. The 6,000 figure lives on Latka, which the card already cites: 'Jetpack Workflow serves 6K customers.' Re-sourced to the page that actually prints it and marked as a Latka estimate, not a company statement

jetpackmetrics[per user / mo]

was$36-50

now$40-50

the live pricing page shows Starter '$40 Per user / mo, billed annually' and Premium '$50 Per user / mo, billed annually' (monthly billing adds $9/user/mo). No $36 tier exists. Corrected and given the URL

simpleanalyticsmoney_flow

wasThey subscribe: $19-99/mo, EU-hosted

nowThey subscribe: self-serve from $20/mo, plus a free hobby tier, EU-hosted

simpleanalytics.com/pricing now sells a single Self-serve plan from $20/month (pageview slider, +$20/mo per extra user), a free-forever hobby tier and a custom Enterprise plan; the $19-99 ladder no longer exists

simpleanalyticsmetrics[paying customers]

was1,331

now1,323

same live counter - the dashboard reads '1323 paying customers' today (card said 1,331). Dated rather than left to rot, and given the URL it comes from

simpleanalyticsmetrics[ARR (live dashboard)]

was$603K

now$604K

this comes off Simple Analytics' public live dashboard, so it drifts daily - chasing it is pointless. Read the dashboard today ($604k ARR), set the value and stamped it with asOf so a stale claim about today becomes a true claim about a month. URL added

insuredminemoney_flow

wasPays about $99/seat/mo, near $13K/yr per agency

nowPays $109/user/mo per InsuredMine's own comparison page; insuredmine.com/pricing itself publishes no price (contact sales)

the cited insuredmine-vs-salesforce page states '$109/user/month (volume discounts available)', not $99. The pricing page shows only $.00 placeholders and a $1 trial, so $109 from the company's own comparison page is the only price on any page. The 'near $13K/yr per agency' extrapolation rested on the wrong seat price and on an unstated seat count, so it is removed

hellotaxmoney_flow

washellotax auto-registers and files it from about $42/mo

nowhellotax auto-registers and files it from 49 EUR/mo per country

hellotax.com/pricing now starts at 49 EUR/mo (New Seller, per country), then OSS 89 EUR, Established Seller 119 EUR, 5-country package 470 EUR; the old floor (39 EUR, about $42) is on no page any more

hellotaxmetrics[seller clients]

was2,000+

now10K+

the tile said 2,000+ tagged 'hellotax' but no cited hellotax page carried it, and the company's own live homepage contradicts it: '+10K eCommerce sellers from around the world have already subscribed'. Corrected to the company's live claim with the page that prints it

vintedmetrics[registered members]

was100M+ registered members

now(removed)

no page carries it. Opened vinted.com/about ('a community of millions', no figure), company.vinted.com (newsroom, no figure), the cited FY2025 results release (GMV, revenue, profit - no member count) and careers.vinted.com/about-vinted (2,200+ employees, 25+ markets, no member count). The only cited page with a user count is Revenue Memo, a third party, and it says a different number (over 120 million users). A tile nobody can check is worth less than no tile

faceupmetrics[organizations]

was3,700+

now3,600+

the tile said 3,700+ but overstated both cited pages; the live faceup.com/en/about-us says '3,600+ Satisfied Clients' (CFOtech says 'more than 3,600' too). Corrected down to what the company actually says

halopsamoney_flow

wasPays per agent, monthly, all-in

nowPays £66 per agent per month, billed annually - one price, no tiers

halopsa.com/pricing now redirects to usehalo.com/halopsa/pricing/, which prints '£66 per agent, per month' billed annually and 'No tiers, no bolt-ons, no locked-away features'. The card's money_flow carried no price at all and its price list still shows a tiered $35-129/agent that no longer exists

gtowizardmoney_flow

wasCharge $39-129/mo for the library plus AI custom solves

nowCharge $49-279/mo (about $39-229/mo on annual billing) for the library plus AI custom solves

the cited PokerNews pricing page contradicts $39-129; monthly tiers run $49 to $279

gtowizardmetrics[Monthly tiers]

was$39-129

now$49-279

the card printed $39-129 while the very PokerNews page it cites lists Free $0, Starter $49, Premium $99, Elite $169, Ultra $279 per month (about $39-229/mo on annual billing). Corrected to the monthly ladder actually printed, with the URL

fathommetrics[companies use it]

was15.5K

now28,375

the tile said 15.5K tagged 'Enlyft' with no URL and Enlyft was not among the card's sources, so a reader had nothing to check. Opened the Enlyft page: it now says 'We have data on 28,375 companies that use Fathom Analytics'. Corrected, given a URL, dated, and flagged as an Enlyft detection estimate rather than a company-stated customer count

greenlymetrics[business clients]

was2,000

now3,500+

the tile said 2,000 sourced to Forbes (Apr 2024) and was undated; the live greenly.earth/en-us page says 'Trusted by 3,500+ clients'. Updated to the company's own live claim, sourced and dated

stocksymoney_flow

wasCurate hard: about 4-5% of photographer applicants get in

nowCurate hard: Stocksy says only 1% of artist applicants are accepted

the live stocksy.com/service/about page states 'only 1% of artist applicants accepted'; the card's 4-5% is stale

usersnapmoney_flow

was1,500 firms pay yearly — $2.2M

now1,300+ firms pay yearly — $2.2M at the 2023 sale

matches the corrected tile: saas.group's announcement says 'more than 1,300 worldwide customers'

usersnapmetrics[paying companies]

was1,500

now1,300+

the tile said 1,500 sourced to saas.group, but the saas.group announcement says 'Usersnap now has more than 1,300 worldwide customers'. 1,500 is TheyGotAcquired's figure. Corrected to the first-party acquirer's number, which is the source the tile names

frontendmentormetrics[registered users]

was500K+

now1.17M+

2.4x stale: the site's live counter now reads 'Join 1,177,724 developers building the skills and judgment that get them hired.' It is a live counter, so the tile is dated rather than pinned to an exact figure that will drift

unicornplatformmoney_flow

wasAbout 1,000 pay $8-28/mo = $16K MRR

nowAbout 1,000 paid $8-28/mo at the 2022 sale = $16K MRR; under the buyer, list price now runs $14-350/mo ($9-250 yearly)

the $8-28/mo band is dead. unicornplatform.com/pricing now prints Maker $14/month ($9 yearly) through Major $350/month ($250 yearly). The $16K MRR at sale is a historical fact and is kept, but dated so a reader does not read the old band as today's price

fincenfetchmetrics[firms white-label it]

was1,000+

now700+

the cited About page now says 'FincenFetch is a leading BOI filing solution used by more than 700 firms across the U.S.' The homepage still says 'Trusted by 1000+ Firms', so the company contradicts itself; the card follows the cited page, which is the lower and more recently maintained claim

everbeemoney_flow

was$19.99-69/mo subscriptions across 900K sellers

now$29.99-99/mo month-to-month ($19.99-69/mo billed annually) across 900K sellers

everbee.io/research-pricing prints Growth at $29.99/monthly month-to-month vs $19.99/monthly billed annually ($239/year), and Business at $99/monthly vs $69/monthly billed annually ($828/year); the card printed the annual rate as if it were the monthly price

fiskalymetrics[B2B POS/retail clients]

was800+

now1,600+

stale: the 800+ figure is from the 2024 Verdane post ('With more than 800 B2B customers'); fiskaly.com now prints 'Over 1,600 customers trust our fiscalization solutions.'

emailoctopusmoney_flow

wasUpgrade to paid from $8/mo — AWS SES sending stays tiny

nowUpgrade to paid from $9/mo billed yearly — AWS SES sending stays tiny

the live pricing page prints the cheapest paid plan as '$9 PER MONTH, BILLED YEARLY'; the free tier (2,500 subscribers, 10,000 emails per month) is unchanged and stays as-is

plausiblemetrics[sites tracked]

was500k+ sites tracked

now(removed)

no page anywhere carries 500k+ sites. The tile had no source label; the only cited page with a site count is the 2022 $1M-ARR post, which says 'actively counting stats on more than 50,000 websites' — an order of magnitude below the tile. The homepage and /about state subscribers and pageviews (260B) but no site count, so there is nothing to correct it to

plausiblemetrics[paying subs]

was15k+

now19,000+

plausible.io/about now prints 'More than 19,000 paying subscribers use Plausible' (the homepage shows the same as '19k'); the card's 15k+ was stale and carried no source label

erecht24money_flow

wasPays monthly for lawyer-updated, warranted texts

nowPays for lawyer-updated, warranted texts: eRecht24 Premium lists at EUR 30-1,600/mo (Basic to Ultimate), EUR 15-800/mo on annual prepay

e-recht24.de/mitglieder prints Basic at 30 EUR list / 15 EUR per month and Ultimate at 1.600 EUR list / 800 EUR per month; the card's band was the annual-prepay rate presented as the list price

erecht24metrics[paying customers]

was47,000+ paying customers

now(removed)

no page anywhere carries a paying-customer count of 47,000+. The homepage says 'more than 370,000 Webseiten erfolgreich rechtlich abgesichert' (websites secured) and the members page says 'Ueber 250.000 Nutzer' (users) — neither is a paying-customer count, and both are a different order of magnitude. Rather than relabel a users figure as paying customers, the tile is dropped

empireflippersmetrics[businesses sold]

was$580M+

now$590M+

the card's $580M+ appears on no page. The homepage carries the live counter — '$590,197,649' under 'Overall Sales' and 'bought and sold over $590M+ worth of online businesses' — so the tile is pointed there and dated. The cited About page contradicts itself (body: 'over $450 million'; footer: 'over $590M+'), so it is no longer the source of record for this number

teambuildrmoney_flow

wasFlat subscription—NFL pays what a high school pays

nowSubscription tiered by roster size, not by league: $90/mo up to 50 profiles to $280/mo up to 1,000

teambuildr.com/pricing prints Silver $90/mo (up to 50 profiles), Gold $150/mo (up to 250), Platinum $200/mo (up to 500), Platinum Pro $280/mo (up to 1,000) — a big high-school program can land in a higher tier than a 90-man NFL roster, so 'flat' was false as printed

teambuildrmetrics[programs / teams]

was5,000+

now5,500+

the tile was sourced to teambuildr.com/team, which is a headshot page carrying no count; the homepage is the page that prints it, and it now reads 'Used by 5,500+ teams worldwide' / 'Trusted by 5,500+ of the top strength coaches, teams & facilities since 2012' (it also says '5k+ programs run on TeamBuildr'). It is a marketing counter, so it is dated

shopvoxmoney_flow

wasPays $99-499+/mo per shop; data syncs to QuickBooks

nowPays $109/mo + $29/user/mo (Express) or $249/mo + $49/user/mo (PRO), onboarding from $499; data syncs to QuickBooks

shopvox.com/pricing prints 'shopVOX Express: $109 /mo + $29 /user/mo' and 'shopVOX PRO: $249 /mo + $49 /user/mo' with 'Onboarding packages starting at $499'; the card's $99-499+/mo band named neither the base price nor the per-seat structure

truckparkingclubmetrics[property locations]

was4,000+

now5,900+

this is a live counter, not a static stat: the homepage (opened in a browser, since it 403s a plain fetch) reads '5946 Property Members and growing (114 added in the last week)'. The audit saw 5942 a few days ago. The card's '4,000+' was the Feb-2026 PR number and is about 30% low. Updated and pinned with a date - chasing a counter that adds about 100/week is pointless, so the tile now makes a true claim about a month rather than a false one about today.

doxymerivals[Doxy.me].price

wasFree-$35

nowFree-$29

live pricing page: free tier plus Premium at US$29/user/mo billed annually.

doxymemoney_flow

wasUpgrades to Premium at about $35 per provider / month

nowUpgrades to Premium at US$29 per user / month, billed annually

the pricing page is JS-rendered, so I opened it in a browser: 'Premium Plan / Built for care, not just calls / US$29 per user / month, billed annually'. The card's own cited founder interview also says $30, never $35.

cannyrivals[Canny].price

wasFree / $99+/mo

nowFree / Pro $79/mo (yearly)

live pricing page says $79/month billed yearly, not $99/mo.

cannymoney_flow

wasTeams pay monthly for private boards, seats, and integrations

nowTeams pay by tracked users for private boards and integrations - Pro from $79/mo billed yearly

opened canny.io/pricing: Free $0 (25 tracked users), Pro '$79/month billed yearly' (100+ tracked users), Business custom (5,000+ tracked users). Pricing is metered on tracked users, not seats - the card had the billing axis wrong as well as the number.

contentpacerivals[Contentpace].price

was$30/mo

now$30/mo (historical - product shut down)

a live price for a domain that no longer resolves is the one number on this card a reader could actually act on.

contentpacemoney_flow

was4,000 teams pay: subscriptions plus AppSumo lifetime deals

now4,000 teams paid: subscriptions plus AppSumo lifetime deals - sold to Content at Scale in 2023, absorbed into BrandWell in 2024

brandwell.ai (opened; post dated August 27 2024) confirms the acquisition, and the card's own source line already said the standalone product no longer exists. The money_flow was the last place still describing it in the present tense.

contentpacemoney_flow

wasContentpace auto-builds the keyword brief and report

nowContentpace auto-built the keyword brief and report

the product is gone - contentpace.com no longer resolves (DNS timeout on fetch). Present tense implies a live product.

booqablerivals[Booqable].price

wasfrom $29/mo

nowfrom $35/mo ($29 billed yearly)

same - $29 is the annual-billing price, not the entry monthly price.

booqablemoney_flow

wasPays Booqable $29-149/mo flat — zero cut of bookings

nowPays Booqable $35-187/mo flat, or $29-149/mo billed yearly — zero cut of bookings

opened booqable.com/pricing: the monthly rack rate is Start $35, Grow $87, Scale $187. $29/$69/$149 is the annual-billing column (20% off). The card quoted the discounted column without saying so. 'No commission on bookings' is confirmed on the page.

fishingbookermoney_flow

wasFishingBooker keeps 10-30% deposit

nowFishingBooker keeps the commission the captain sets, 10-30%

the help page the card cited says only 'The commission is the same as the deposit you set' with no range. The range is on a different FishingBooker help page, which I opened: 'You can set your commission at anywhere between 10%-30%.' Reworded so the claim matches the page that carries it - the captain sets the rate, FishingBooker keeps it.

quicklirivals[Quickli].price

wasA$59/mo

nowA$39/mo + GST

live pricing page monthly tier is $39/month + GST; $59 appears only as the crossed-out former price.

quicklimoney_flow

wasBroker pays A$59/mo per seat

nowBroker pays A$39/mo + GST per seat on Core, A$79 on Pro

A$59 is now the struck-through old price on quickli.com.au/pricing. Opened the page and clicked the monthly toggle: Core is $39/month + GST (was $59) and Pro is $79/month + GST (was $99). Annual billing is $530/yr + GST (Core) and $930/yr + GST (Pro).

zerodhamoney_flow

wasIntraday and F&O orders cost a flat ₹20 (about $0.24)

nowOptions cost a flat Rs. 20 per executed order; intraday and futures cost 0.03% or Rs. 20, whichever is lower (about $0.24)

zerodha.com/charges: equity delivery 'Zero Brokerage'; equity intraday and futures '0.03% or Rs. 20/executed order whichever is lower'; options 'Flat Rs. 20 per executed order'. Only options are flat Rs. 20

bandzooglemoney_flow

wasBandzoogle charges a flat monthly fee (from $8.29) - its only revenue

nowBandzoogle charges a flat monthly fee (website plans from $9.16/mo billed annually, or $11/mo monthly) - its only revenue

$8.29 was the 2023 acquisition-era price. Live bandzoogle.com/pricing: Lite $9.16/mo billed annually or $11.00/month, Standard $14.16 ($17), Pro $18.33 ($22)

audioeyemoney_flow

wasADA web lawsuits surge - 2,000+ filed in a single half-year

nowADA web lawsuits surge - 26,253 filed in 2025, up 102% since 2020

the '2,000+ in a single half-year' figure is on no cited page. AudioEye's own litigation report gives 26,253 total filings in 2025 and a '102% increase in total filings since 2020' - same point, made with a number the source actually prints

audioeyemetrics[ADA web suits, H1'25 YoY]

was+37% ADA web suits, H1'25 YoY

now(removed)

the cited litigation report carries neither an H1-2025 count nor +37%. Opened in full, it reports total filings by year (2024: 20,112; 2025: 26,253), '102% increase in total filings since 2020', '77% of lawsuits were filed in state courts'. There is no half-year cut and no 37% anywhere - no page to move it to, so it goes

weglotmoney_flow

wasPay $16-760/mo as words + languages grow

nowPay $17-769/mo as words + languages grow

weglot.com/pricing today: Starter EUR 15 ($17)/mo through Extended EUR 699 ($769)/mo

weglotmetrics[paying customers]

was25,000 paying customers

now(removed)

25,000 is on no page anywhere. The cited Weglot blog says 'more than 60,000 B2B and B2C brands' and 'Trusted by 110,000+ global brands'; weglot.com today says '111,368+ global brands rely on Weglot'; Slator says not disclosed; TechCrunch does not mention it. None of those is a PAYING customer count, so there is nothing to correct it to - dropped rather than swapped for a brands-served number under a paying-customers label

weavemetrics[net revenue retention]

was98%

now93%

STALE, and the direction is down. The FY2025 10-K table reads 'Dollar-based net retention rate 93% / 98%' for 2025 / 2024. The card's undated 98% is the 2024 figure being read as today's

buttondownmoney_flow

wasPays flat $9+/mo by subscriber tier — 0% revenue cut

nowFree for the first 100 subscribers, then paid as the list grows; add-ons from +$9/mo — 0% revenue cut

buttondown.com/pricing is no longer a flat tier: 'Absolutely nothing for your first 100 subscribers', then a-la-carte add-ons (+$9/mo each for tagging, paid subscriptions, comments, analytics, RSS-to-email, sponsorships, attachments; +$29/mo for custom-domain archives, multiple newsletters, automations; +$79/mo for whitelabeling, teams)

browserlessmetrics[open-source repo stars]

was13.4k

now13.5k

live counter: repo shows 13.5k today. Dated rather than left to drift again - chasing it monthly is pointless

collectrmetrics[users, $0 ad spend]

was4M+

now10M+

4M+ was the Aug-2025 BetaKit number; getcollectr.com now prints '10M+ collectors'. The '$0 ad spend' half of the label is still BetaKit's claim, not the company site's

talkingparentsmetrics[Total users]

was500k

now870k+

500k was tagged 'press' with no URL; the Jul-2025 GlobeNewswire says 'over half a million families', and the company's own site now prints '870k+ families served'. NOTE: the company counts FAMILIES, not individual users - the label 'Total users' overstates what any page says and should be relabelled 'families served'

textemallhonesty

wasFounding (2005 by four co-founders, per Text-Em-All's About page), bootstrapped/no-VC status, 16,000+ orgs served, pricing, and the Oct 2023 Employee Ownership Trust (first US SaaS EOT, structured with Common Trust) are first-party or from the deal advisor.

nowFounding (2005 by four co-founders, per Text-Em-All's About page), 16,000+ orgs served, pricing, and the Oct 2023 Employee Ownership Trust (first US SaaS EOT, structured with Common Trust) are first-party or from the deal advisor. The "bootstrapped, no VC" part is not: neither the About page nor the Common Trust case study mentions funding history at all, so treat it as unconfirmed - what is documented is that the trust owns 100% of the company today.

Neither cited page supports the funding claim. text-em-all.com/about-us covers ownership ('Every person you see on this page is a co-owner of this company', 'stay private, stay employee-owned') but says nothing about VC; the Common Trust case study covers the Oct 2023 EOT and never addresses how the company was capitalized. The card attributed 'bootstrapped/no-VC status' to those sources. https://www.text-em-all.com/about-us

catawikidies_evidence

wasand it still runs near breakeven

nowand it only turned profitable in 2025

Same first-party release: FY2025 is the year net profit and adjusted EBITDA both turned positive (EUR 5.8M / EUR 11.2M). The 2024 figure the card leans on is now the prior year. https://www.catawiki.com/en/press/1949-catawiki-delivers-profitable-growth-in-2025-driven-by-strong-business-performance

catawikirev_line

wasit took 16 years to cross that mark and still runs near breakeven

nowit took 16 years to cross that mark, and it ran near breakeven until 2025, when it posted its first real profit

'Still runs near breakeven' is false as of the company's own FY2025 release (11 June 2026): net profit EUR 5.8M, adjusted EBITDA EUR 11.2M, 10% margin, 'with both metrics turning positive compared with 2024'. https://www.catawiki.com/en/press/1949-catawiki-delivers-profitable-growth-in-2025-driven-by-strong-business-performance

catawikisoft_spot

wasExperts scale linearly; margin near zero.

nowExperts scale linearly; margins stay thin.

Catawiki's FY2025 results (published 11 June 2026) report net profit of EUR 5.8M and adjusted EBITDA of EUR 11.2M, 'representing a 10% margin on revenue', up from -0.3% in 2024. 'Margin near zero' is no longer true as a present-tense claim. https://www.catawiki.com/en/press/1949-catawiki-delivers-profitable-growth-in-2025-driven-by-strong-business-performance

eqvistahonesty

wasNo drama fabricated; Carta is the real competitive threat.

nowNo drama fabricated; Carta is the real competitive threat. One caveat on funding: "$0 outside funding" is founder-stated and is an as-of claim, not a guarantee - Eqvista filed a Reg CF offering with the SEC (Form C, 8 Nov 2022, up to about $5M, via Securitize) and then formally withdrew it (Form C-W, 9 Feb 2023). Those two filings are Eqvista Inc's entire EDGAR history, so no completed round is on record, and aggregator listings of a "$5M Series A" appear to be that withdrawn offering, mis-scraped.

Eqvista Inc (CIK 0001941319) has exactly two SEC filings: a Form C (2022-11-08) and a Form C-W withdrawal (2023-02-09). No completed raise is on record, so '$0 outside funding' is not disprovable - but it is not verifiable either, and Tracxn/Latka print a '$5M Series A' that never closed. Per the honesty rule, the doubt goes here rather than into the claim. https://data.sec.gov/submissions/CIK0001941319.json

oddsjamhonesty

wasThe competitive-rebuild and regulatory "dies" scenarios are [our read], not documented events — no drama was fabricated.

nowOddsJam is no longer independent: Gambling.com Group (Nasdaq: GAMB) completed its acquisition of parent Odds Holdings on 1 January 2025, so everything after that date is a subsidiary's story, not a bootstrapper's. The competitive-rebuild and regulatory "dies" scenarios are [our read], not documented events — no drama was fabricated.

Gambling.com Group's own investor release: 'it completed the previously announced acquisition of Odds Holdings, Inc., the parent company of OddsJam, on January 1, 2025, as planned and on schedule.' The card discussed the deal only as a pending/announced transaction and never stated the current owner. https://www.gdcgroup.com/investors/news/gambling-com-group-completes-acquisition-of-odds-holdings-inc-parent-company-of-oddsjam/7b002b9d-2af3-4ec2-966b-36145b46262f

skimmerhonesty

wasRevenue is private, so I headline the officially disclosed $74M growth round (Skimmer's own blog + Mainsail Partners press, Oct 16 2024) rather than a shaky ARR.

nowRevenue is private, so I headline the officially disclosed $74M growth round (Skimmer's own blog + Mainsail Partners press, Oct 16 2024) rather than a shaky ARR. Skimmer is not bootstrapped, and was not before that round either: Mainsail's release says Unbundled Capital first invested in 2020 and that its two partners stay on the board. Whether the 2024 round is minority or control is stated on no public page.

Mainsail's release: 'Since Unbundled's initial investment in 2020, Skimmer has built a highly talented team' and 'Peter Freeland and Shane Skiffington of Unbundled Capital will remain on the Board of Directors'. The card disclosed the 2024 raise but not the 2020 institutional investor, leaving a bootstrapped reading available. https://mainsailpartners.com/skimmer-receives-growth-investment-from-mainsail-partners/

fattureincloudhonesty

wasAfter TeamSystem took 51% (2015) and folded it in, standalone ARR is no longer separately disclosed

nowAfter TeamSystem took 51% (2015) and then, in 2025, merged the operating company MadBit Entertainment S.r.l. into TeamSystem S.p.A. - making Fatture in Cloud a TeamSystem product line, not a company with a minority stake sold - standalone ARR is no longer separately disclosed

Fatture in Cloud's own timeline: '2025: con la fusione per incorporazione dell'azienda MadBit Entertainment S.r.l, Fatture in Cloud diventa un prodotto di TeamSystem S.P.A.' The site footer now reads 'Fatture in Cloud e un prodotto di TeamSystem S.p.A.' The '51% stake' framing is two ownership steps out of date. https://www.fattureincloud.it/chi-siamo/

coconalahonesty

wasNote: founder Minami resigned from the board in Jan 2024 over a compliance issue and now runs a related VC.

nowNote: founder Akiyuki Minami resigned as a director on 29 January 2025, after Coconala disclosed an internal violation of its officer code of conduct and compliance rules (Business Insider Japan); in April 2025 note Inc. bought his entire 9.30% stake for 737M yen (ITmedia).

The resignation was 29 Jan 2025, not Jan 2024: Business Insider Japan, dated Jan 29 2025, quotes Coconala's disclosure of a violation of 'officer code and compliance rules' and says the resignation took effect the same day. The founder's stake sale to note Inc. (9.30%, 737M yen, 23 April 2025) is the ownership change the card missed. https://www.businessinsider.jp/article/2501-coconala-compliance/

opendentalhonesty

wasthe GPL-to-proprietary switch at v24.4 (2024)

nowthe GPL-to-proprietary switch at v24.4 (released 20 March 2025)

opendental.com/site/versions.html lists version 24.4 release date as 03/20/2025; license.html confirms 'In version 24.4, the Open Dental license changed from open source GPL to proprietary.' https://www.opendental.com/site/versions.html

opendentaldies

wasthe 2024 proprietary switch

nowthe 2025 proprietary switch

Open Dental's own license page says the switch happened 'in version 24.4', and its versions page dates 24.4 to 03/20/2025 (24.3 = 12/19/2024). The version number reads like 2024; the release was 2025. https://www.opendental.com/site/versions.html

reverbhonesty

wasthe April 2025 sale to Creator Partners + Servco are documented

nowthe sale to Creator Partners + Servco - announced 22 April 2025, closed 2 June 2025 per Etsy's Q2 10-Q - are documented. Reverb is privately held by those two buyers today, not by Etsy

Same 10-Q confirms the close date and that Reverb Holdings went to Reverb IntermediateCo LLC, a subsidiary of Reverb Partners LLC (the Creator Partners + Servco vehicle). The card never said who owns Reverb now. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1370637/000137063725000066/etsy-20250630.htm

reverbdies_evidence

wasEtsy divested it to Creator Partners + Servco in April 2025

nowEtsy agreed in April 2025 to sell it to Creator Partners + Servco and closed the sale on 2 June 2025

Etsy's Q2 2025 10-Q: 'On June 2, 2025, Etsy closed the previously announced sale of Reverb Holdings, Inc.' April 2025 was the announcement, not the divestiture. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1370637/000137063725000066/etsy-20250630.htm

rtafleethonesty

wasThe 2025 Series A amount was mentioned in the interview but not in the press release, so we don't headline a figure.

nowRTA is no longer bootstrapped: Susquehanna Growth Equity led a Series A announced 24 April 2025, and RTA's own release says 'SGE led the round as a minority investor'. That release states no dollar amount; the $30M figure appears only in Practical Founders' write-up, so we don't headline it.

RTA's own press page confirms the Series A closed (24 April 2025, SGE as minority investor) and states no amount; the $30M comes solely from Practical Founders. The card never stated the company took outside money. https://rtafleet.com/press/rta-secures-series-a-funding-from-sge-to-accelerate-growth-and-innovation-in-fleet-management

komoothonesty

wasthe 2025 paywall backlash and post-sale layoffs are documented.

nowthe 2025 paywall backlash is documented; the layoff scale (DC Rainmaker: 'roughly 85% of the staff being let go within the first two weeks, upwards of about 150 people') rests on his unnamed sources, not on any komoot or Bending Spoons statement.

The layoff figure is real reporting but not first-party: DC Rainmaker attributes it to 'my discussions with people familiar with the deal'. Card asserted it as documented fact. https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2025/05/komoot-team-goodbye.html

komoothonesty

waskomoot took one small state-fund seed (about $1.6M, 2014) and is otherwise bootstrapped.

nowkomoot was not bootstrapped: its own acquisition release names four backers (KRW Schindler, Outdoor Secondary, MBG Beteiligungsgesellschaft Berlin-Brandenburg, LP Capital), and the sellers' law firm calls the first two the venture funds holding the largest stake outside the founders. Bending Spoons closed the full acquisition on 20 March 2025.

Raue (sellers' counsel) confirms two VC funds were the largest outside shareholders; the acquisition release confirms the deal closed, not a minority stake. https://raue.com/en/news/industries/private-equity-und-venture-capital-en/venture-capital-en/raue-advises-krw-schindler-and-others-on-the-sale-of-komoot-to-bending-spoons/

komootmhook

wasSix friends bootstrapped a hiking app to 45M users and $54M revenue

nowSix friends grew a hiking app to 45M users and $54M revenue

Same falsehood: 'bootstrapped' is contradicted by komoot's own acquisition release, which lists KRW Schindler, Outdoor Secondary, MBG Beteiligungsgesellschaft Berlin-Brandenburg and LP Capital as investors, and by the sellers' law firm, which calls the first two venture capital funds holding the largest stake outside the founders. https://raue.com/en/news/industries/private-equity-und-venture-capital-en/venture-capital-en/raue-advises-krw-schindler-and-others-on-the-sale-of-komoot-to-bending-spoons/

komoothook

wasbootstrapped to 45M users

nowgrown to 45M users, then sold

komoot was not bootstrapped. Its own acquisition release names four backers, and Raue (the law firm that advised the sellers) calls KRW Schindler Investments SA and Outdoor Secondary Investors SCS 'the two venture capital funds which held the largest stake outside the group of founders'. Bending Spoons closed the acquisition on 20 March 2025. https://raue.com/en/news/industries/private-equity-und-venture-capital-en/venture-capital-en/raue-advises-krw-schindler-and-others-on-the-sale-of-komoot-to-bending-spoons/

workivarevenue.value

was$739M

now$884.6M

read straight from the 10-K (accession 0001445305-26-000016) via SEC XBRL — period, currency and entity as filed, not as interpreted

webptrevenue.label

wasARR, founder-stated

nowrevenue, press-stated

This page states 'She grew her company from $15 million to more than $100 million by partnering with Battery Ventures.' Inc 403s a plain fetch; opened in a browser the sentence is there, so the number is real - our bug was not finding it. But the page is labelled 'PAID CONTENT / BATTERY VENTURES' (WebPT's own investor), the sentence is the writer's prose, not a Heidi Jannenga quote, and the page never calls the figure 'ARR' nor dates the $100M milestone (the Aug 8, 2024 date is only the article's publish date). Keep the $100M+ value, keep the badge at EST rather than promoting to STATED, and drop the 'ARR, founder-stated' label for 'revenue, press-stated'.

skebrevenue.original

was(none)

now350 man-nin (registered users, as of 2025-03); GMV 7 oku yen per month

Skeb's own company page states total registered users passed 3.5 million (350 man-nin, as of March 2025) and monthly transaction volume of 700 million yen (7 oku yen), in Japanese units, which is why no literal Latin-numeral match exists. The user count (3.5M+) is correctly converted and correct. The card's separate '$4.7M/mo GMV' metric is our own yen-to-dollar arithmetic on that 700M yen and appears on no page - it needs an explicit converted-from marker. The card already correctly treats GMV as not revenue and flags the about $5M/yr net (at Skeb's about 10% take) as an estimate.

simpleanalyticsrevenue.value

was$603K

now$603.8K

The founder's own live open-metrics dashboard shows MRR about $50.3k with 1,323 paying customers (ARR $603.8k), 'last updated 3 minutes ago' at time of opening. We print '$603K'; the page prints '$603.8k' - rounding is why the string was not found. Print $603.8K. The card's paying-customer count (1,331) is already stale versus the live 1,323 - any figure from this page needs an asOf stamp or it will keep drifting.

punchpassrevenue.value

was$634K/yr

now$633.8K

Latka's page states 'In 2024, Punchpass's revenue reached $633.8K' / 'Punchpass Hit $633.8k revenue in October 2024 (Estimated)'; we printed '$634K', a harmless rounding. Print $633.8K and keep the EST badge - Punchpass is private and has published no figure itself since the founder's 2017 Indie Hackers MRR posts, where the bulletproof first-party number remains $26,776 MRR (June 2017).

publisherrocketrevenue.label

wasest. cumulative sales

nowJul 2021, founder-stated

Dave Chesson says on the record, on Publisher Rocket specifically: 'Right now we're hitting around $130,000 a month,' adding 'about 50% in profit' (Mixergy, Jul 12, 2021). Our '$10M+' is flagged STATED but is actually our own multiplication (117k buyers x about $100) - nobody prints $10M+, and the card's own honesty note already concedes it is an estimate. Print the real founder-stated monthly figure with its date; this is five years stale and must not be annualized into a current ARR. The '117k+ authors' figure is separately confirmed first-party on the Kindlepreneur review page and can stay; re-source the $199 price to publisherrocket.com since the Mixergy page does not carry it.

publisherrocketrevenue.value

was$10M+

nowabout $130K/mo

Dave Chesson says on the record, on Publisher Rocket specifically: 'Right now we're hitting around $130,000 a month,' adding 'about 50% in profit' (Mixergy, Jul 12, 2021). Our '$10M+' is flagged STATED but is actually our own multiplication (117k buyers x about $100) - nobody prints $10M+, and the card's own honesty note already concedes it is an estimate. Print the real founder-stated monthly figure with its date; this is five years stale and must not be annualized into a current ARR. The '117k+ authors' figure is separately confirmed first-party on the Kindlepreneur review page and can stay; re-source the $199 price to publisherrocket.com since the Mixergy page does not carry it.

predictwindrevenue.label

wasusers

nowusers (Dec 2023)

Founder Jon Bilger states in a Dec 2023 interview, 'We currently have over a million users on PredictWind.' Medium serves a shell to a plain fetcher but the quote is there in a browser; no revenue figure appears anywhere on this page. Two fixes needed: (a) the card's metrics block separately says '300k+ users worldwide', 3x below the founder's own 1M+ - reconcile to 1M+ (Dec 2023); (b) the card's 'about $12M/yr' ZoomInfo estimate is cited to zoominfo.com, which is bot-walled and was never opened - it should not be printed as a metric.

metafilterrevenue.label

was2020, community-funded

nowincome vs $30.5K/mo expenses

MetaFilter staff's own first-party finance post (Jan 15, 2020, opened in a browser after a 403 to plain fetch) states standard recurring expenses of about $30,500 and net income from all sources of about $31,500 - monthly figures only. Our '$380K/yr' is our own annualization ($31,500 x 12), printed on no page, and the post itself warns this particular month is seasonally inflated by a December/January holiday-ad bump. Print the monthly break-even pair instead of an annualized figure.

metafilterrevenue.value

was$380K/yr

nowabout $31.5K/mo

MetaFilter staff's own first-party finance post (Jan 15, 2020, opened in a browser after a 403 to plain fetch) states standard recurring expenses of about $30,500 and net income from all sources of about $31,500 - monthly figures only. Our '$380K/yr' is our own annualization ($31,500 x 12), printed on no page, and the post itself warns this particular month is seasonally inflated by a December/January holiday-ad bump. Print the monthly break-even pair instead of an annualized figure.

makuakerevenue.original

was(none)

now4,578 million yen (FY2025, year ended Sept 2025)

Makuake (TSE: 4479) filed net sales of 4,578 million yen for FY ended Sept 30, 2025 (prior years 3,653M FY2024, 3,810M FY2023; company forecast 5,400M FY2026), reproduced on this Yahoo Finance Japan table. Our revenue_sentence said 'about JPY 4.48B', which is wrong - the page says 4,578 million yen (4.578B), not 4.48B. Our '$30M' dollar figure is our own conversion at about 150 and appears on no page, but at that rate 4,578M yen is about $30.5M so the dollar headline survives once the underlying yen figure is corrected. This is net sales (Makuake's own take, about a 20% cut), not GMV. MarketScreener, also cited on the card, is bot-walled to any fetcher - nothing asserted from it.

konnectinsightsrevenue.original

was800,000 to over 10 million

nowSomewhere around 7 million or so this year we should complete about 7 million

The SaaS Club podcast page's title and summary both call Konnect Insights a '$7M ARR' company, and founder Sameer Narkar says on air 'somewhere around 7 million or so this year we should complete about 7 million.' Our fetcher missed it because the transcript body loads client-side - the card's $7M figure is correct. Separately, the stored revenue.original snippet ('800,000 to over 10 million') is a stray fragment unrelated to the $7M headline and should be replaced with the founder quote above.

japandevrevenue.value

was$62K/mo

now$62,197/mo

Founder Eric Turner posted it himself on Indie Hackers: 'In July, it made $62,197 in revenue' (July 2022). We print '$62K/mo', an honest but loose rounding - print the exact $62,197/mo instead so the string matches the source. This figure is four years old; keep it dated rather than replace it with a later podcast's unsourced 'about $80K/mo'.

indifferentbroccolirevenue.label

wasARR (founder-stated)

nowfounder-stated

Starter Story's page carries the founder's dashboard-reported figure '$82,386 revenue/mo' (2025) plus 2021-2023 annual history, but no current annual or ARR figure. Our '$988K' ARR is our own arithmetic ($82,386 x 12), printed on no page; the article's headline ('$500K to $1M in three days') is the piece's title and treats $1M as a projection, not a booked figure. Print the founder-stated monthly figure and do not annualize it.

indifferentbroccolirevenue.value

was$988K

now$82,386/mo

Starter Story's page carries the founder's dashboard-reported figure '$82,386 revenue/mo' (2025) plus 2021-2023 annual history, but no current annual or ARR figure. Our '$988K' ARR is our own arithmetic ($82,386 x 12), printed on no page; the article's headline ('$500K to $1M in three days') is the piece's title and treats $1M as a projection, not a booked figure. Print the founder-stated monthly figure and do not annualize it.

ignitionrevenue.value

was$47M

now$46.7M

Latka's page shows estimated 2024 revenue $46.7M (Est.), up from $30M in 2023; we printed '$47M', a rounding error. Print $46.7M. The card is otherwise careful: the $3.1B billed / 8,500+ firms / 91% auto-collected figures are first-party from Ignition's own December 2025 press page and are already correctly framed as client money through the platform, not Ignition's own revenue - do not let anyone upgrade the headline to $3.1B.

gorilladeskrevenue.value

wasabout $900K ARR

now$880K

Latka's page states 'GorillaDesk's revenue reached $880K' for 2025 (Est.). We printed 'about $900K ARR', rounding a third-party estimate up and away from the source's own number. Print $880K and keep the EST badge; the bootstrapped/$0-outside-funding/$49-149-per-route facts come from gorilladesk.com directly and are unaffected.

ghostrevenue.value

was$10.8M

now$10.9M

Ghost's own live public financial dashboard shows Annual Run Rate $10,884,111 (Monthly Run Rate $907,009; 30,441 active customers) as of 2026-07-13. The page never prints the abbreviated string '$10.8M' - it prints the exact, moving number. Our card is now stale in the wrong direction (it read $10,818,711/30,349 customers when written); $10,884,111 rounds to $10.9M, not $10.8M. The about-$130M creator-earnings figure remains correctly framed as GMV-like, not Ghost's own revenue.

flomorevenue.original

was(none)

nowshang bai wan (over a million lifelong learners)

flomo's own help site states, in Chinese words rather than a Latin numeral, that over a million lifelong learners use flomo. Our checker searched for a digit '1M' and found none because the page spells the quantity in Chinese characters. The card's '1M+ users, revenue never disclosed' is already an honest, correct rendering - no change needed beyond teaching the checker to read CJK numerals.

fishingbookerrevenue.value

was$28M

now$27.9M

Kona Equity prints 'Revenue: $27,894,000' / 'estimated annual revenue of $27.9 M, with approximately 120 employees' (undated third-party estimate; FishingBooker has never disclosed revenue). Plain fetch 429'd twice - opened in a real browser. We printed '$28M', rounding up past the source's own $27.9M. Print $27.9M and keep the EST badge.

fakturowniarevenue.original

was(none)

now40 892 729 zl (przychody, FY2025); net profit 17 400 652 zl

BizRaport republishes Fakturownia's statutory KRS financial statements: FY2025 revenue 40 892 729 zl (up from 34 825 066 zl in 2024 and 28 721 263 zl in 2023), net profit 17 400 652 zl. Plain fetch got HTTP 429 (bot throttle, not a wall) - opened in a real browser. Our '$11M/yr' is a currency conversion at about 3.7 PLN/USD and appears on no page; print the zloty figure as sourced and keep the dollar as an explicit approximation.

dedaorevenue.original

wasRMB 843 million

now8.43 yi yuan (RMB 843 million), FY2021

Chinese financial press (via the withdrawn-IPO coverage of Siwei Zaowu, Dedao's operator) states FY2021 revenue as 8.43 yi yuan (843 million RMB); the article also gives 2019 (6.28 yi yuan) and 2020 (6.75 yi yuan). Our '$130M' is our own conversion at about 6.45 RMB/USD and appears on no page - keep it only as an explicitly flagged approximation, with the yuan figure as the sourced one. Subject is the listed parent company, not the Dedao app alone.

cimcloudrevenue.label

wasInc 5000 · rev private

now3-yr revenue growth

The card's revenue slot holds '25+ yrs', which is not a revenue figure and does not appear on the cited about-us page either (that page says 'Founded in 1999' / 'over two decades', and confirms CIMcloud is bootstrapped and debt-free with no revenue printed). The company's own blog does carry a revenue-shaped number: it announced ranking 481 on Deloitte's Technology Fast 500 with 119 percent 3-year growth (no dollar amount). Headline that and state revenue is undisclosed.

cimcloudrevenue.value

was25+ yrs

now119%

The card's revenue slot holds '25+ yrs', which is not a revenue figure and does not appear on the cited about-us page either (that page says 'Founded in 1999' / 'over two decades', and confirms CIMcloud is bootstrapped and debt-free with no revenue printed). The company's own blog does carry a revenue-shaped number: it announced ranking 481 on Deloitte's Technology Fast 500 with 119 percent 3-year growth (no dollar amount). Headline that and state revenue is undisclosed.

castosrevenue.value

was$1.5M+

nowjust under $1.5M

Founder Craig Hewitt says on the record in the 2021 Mixergy interview: 'we're doing just under one and a half million ARR right now' - spelled in words, which is why a digit search for '$1.5M' found nothing. Our card prints '$1.5M+', which inverts his own qualifier (he said UNDER, not over). Print 'just under $1.5M'. The card's separate '$3.6M ARR (2024, Latka est.)' claim is a different URL and out of scope here.

barn2revenue.value

was$1.79M/yr

now$1,786,586

Barn2's own 2025 year-in-review post states 'Barn2's total revenue in 2025 was $1,786,586' (61% from annual renewals; lifetime plugin sales past $9.7M). We printed '$1.79M', our own rounding of a company that publishes to the dollar. Print the exact figure.

baremetricsrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

Josh Pigford's own company-blog post states purchase price $4,000,000 in cash at about 2.65x ARR ($3,700,000 to him, $300,000 to the team) - but never states ARR itself. Our '$1.5M ARR' is our own arithmetic ($4M divided by 2.65x), printed on no page. Corroborated by theygotacquired.com ('$4 million in cash', '2.65x ARR', about 1,000 customers, 10-person team, no ARR stated). Headline the sale price; ARR was never disclosed.

baremetricsrevenue.label

wasARR at $4M exit (2.65x)

nowAll-cash sale '20, 2.65x ARR

Josh Pigford's own company-blog post states purchase price $4,000,000 in cash at about 2.65x ARR ($3,700,000 to him, $300,000 to the team) - but never states ARR itself. Our '$1.5M ARR' is our own arithmetic ($4M divided by 2.65x), printed on no page. Corroborated by theygotacquired.com ('$4 million in cash', '2.65x ARR', about 1,000 customers, 10-person team, no ARR stated). Headline the sale price; ARR was never disclosed.

baremetricsrevenue.value

was$1.5M

now$4M

Josh Pigford's own company-blog post states purchase price $4,000,000 in cash at about 2.65x ARR ($3,700,000 to him, $300,000 to the team) - but never states ARR itself. Our '$1.5M ARR' is our own arithmetic ($4M divided by 2.65x), printed on no page. Corroborated by theygotacquired.com ('$4 million in cash', '2.65x ARR', about 1,000 customers, 10-person team, no ARR stated). Headline the sale price; ARR was never disclosed.

angelmatchrevenue.value

was$26K/mo

now$26,182/mo

TrustMRR's live Stripe-verified dashboard shows $26,182 MRR (339 active subscriptions, $892,750 all-time); our '$26K/mo' rounds the same live number but the two supporting metrics on the card are now stale (card says $884K all-time / 343 subs). This is a moving dashboard - any figure taken from it needs an asOf stamp or it drifts again.

accountablerevenue.value

wasabout $730K

now$731.2K

Latka's page prints 'In 2024, Accountable HQ's revenue reached $731.2K.' (4.1K customers, last updated April 10, 2025); we printed 'about $730K', a pure rounding bug. Print $731.2K. Do not restate the conflicting $5.4M/40K-customers figure some honesty notes mention - it is not on this URL.

expresstrucktaxrevenue.value

wasUndisclosed

nowUndisclosed

the 'about $6M/yr' figure fails on subject, not just sourcing: it was an aggregator's estimate for the whole SPAN Enterprises group (which also owned TaxBandits, ExpressExtension, and others), never for ExpressTruckTax alone - and ExpressTruckTax left SPAN in 2022, so the estimate no longer even describes the right company. The Bestpass/Fleetworthy acquisition release (PRNewswire) discloses no price and no revenue, and attributes the card's scale metrics ('over 200,000 businesses,' 'e-filing services for over 5 million trucks') to SPAN, the parent, not to ExpressTruckTax specifically - both are mislabeled on the card. No first-party replacement exists: the ExpressTruckTax homepage prints no counts, fleetworthy.com/about does not name the product, and the old Bestpass press page now redirects to fleetworthy.com/about. The only product-specific figures found are prices on expresstrucktax.com/pricing/ ($19.90 for one truck up to $229.90 for Enterprise, 500+ vehicles) - even the card's own correction note is wrong here, citing a $379.90 top tier that the page does not show. Nothing countable remains to headline, so the revenue line comes off rather than being replaced.

gtowizardrevenue.value

wasUndisclosed

nowUndisclosed

'$20M+ ARR' is entirely our own inference from a 51-200 employee band on a jobs-board aggregator, and the card's own honesty note already admits it is our read; no page prints it. gtowizard.com makes only qualitative claims with no user count; PokerNews' pricing page carries tiers but explicitly no user, revenue, or scale figure. Only provable numbers are subscription tiers $39 (Starter) to $229 (Ultra) per month, not the stale '$39-129,' and official PokerGO/PGT strategy-partner status.

sumsubrevenue.value

wasabout $85M

now$85.6M

we rounded the source. The cited page prints 85.6m; a figure no page carries is a figure we made, however small the difference.

prolificrevenue.value

wasabout $18M

now$18.2M

we rounded the source. The cited page prints 18.2m; a figure no page carries is a figure we made, however small the difference.

fullbayrevenue.value

wasabout $19M

now$19.4M

we rounded the source. The cited page prints 19.4m; a figure no page carries is a figure we made, however small the difference.

bluenotaryrevenue.value

wasabout $7M

now$7.5M

we rounded the source. The cited page prints 7.5m; a figure no page carries is a figure we made, however small the difference.

agencyanalyticsrevenue.value

was$15M+ ARR

now$15.7M ARR

we rounded the source. The cited page prints 15.7m; a figure no page carries is a figure we made, however small the difference.

accessiberevenue.value

was$51M

now$51.3M

we rounded the source. The cited page prints 51.3m; a figure no page carries is a figure we made, however small the difference.

yotirevenue.original

was(none)

nowUS$39 million

Biometric Update quotes CEO Robin Tombs stating 2025 revenue of £29 million (US$39 million), +62% year-on-year, plus EBITDA-profitable every month since March 2025 and 1 billion cumulative age checks - all matching the card as printed, and the card's £29M STATED headline is correct. But a separate metric tile still shows '$37M' as 2025 revenue - that is our own FX conversion, not the source's figure; the source's own dollar conversion is 'US$39 million', and the tile should print that instead of our $37M, or simply lead with £29M.

userwayrevenue.original

was(none)

now13,760

UserWay's TASE periodic and annual report for FY2023 (filed Feb 8, 2024) states revenues of 13,760 (in thousands of USD) = $13.76M, read directly from the filing's financial-data section after rendering the JavaScript MAYA report page in a real browser - WebFetch only sees 'Loading...'. This is the one card in the batch whose badge is now genuinely earned as FILED. Two cautions: the card's '+78% YoY' is not in this document (the FY2022 comparator, $7.75M, would need the prior year's filing, not opened here); and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Userway does not contain the $13.8M figure, confirming it must never be cited for it. UserWay's own H1 2023 press release separately states ARR 'reaching approximately $12 million' - that is mid-year ARR, not FY revenue, and must not be conflated with the $13.76M filed figure.

uplinkrevenue.original

was(none)

nowEUR 16,000/mo

Rule-5 defect: the Starter Story interview (Dec 15, 2019) has founder Manuel Meurer stating the figure in euros - EUR 16,000/mo, on a 10% invoiced-fee model for the engagement's first six months - but the card silently prints '$16K/mo' as if that were the founder's own figure, an unlabeled 1:1 conversion. Fix: print EUR 16,000/mo (Dec 2019, founder-stated); any dollar figure must be explicitly marked as our own conversion. Separately, the same interview says uplink had just crossed 1,000 members, so the card's current '6,200+ vetted members' is not from this interview - it is today's live uplink.tech figure, correctly labeled as such but a different vintage from the revenue quote. Current revenue is undisclosed anywhere opened.

sellerboardrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card's '$4-8M/yr' is our own arithmetic (20K sellers x $19/mo x 12) and appears on no page - rule 5 forbids printing it as sourced. sellerboard.com's own homepage states only '20K+ Amazon sellers trust sellerboard' with no revenue figure; a Latka page separately claims $440K revenue for 2025 with about a 4-person team, which cannot be reconciled with 20K+ payers at $19+/mo, so neither number should be asserted - the company's own user count is the only defensible headline. Pricing ($19-79/mo) is confirmed first-party; the homepage does offer a 1-month free trial, compatible with the card's 'no free tier' claim but should be stated precisely.

sellerboardrevenue.label

wasest: 20K+ payers

nowAmazon sellers

the card's '$4-8M/yr' is our own arithmetic (20K sellers x $19/mo x 12) and appears on no page - rule 5 forbids printing it as sourced. sellerboard.com's own homepage states only '20K+ Amazon sellers trust sellerboard' with no revenue figure; a Latka page separately claims $440K revenue for 2025 with about a 4-person team, which cannot be reconciled with 20K+ payers at $19+/mo, so neither number should be asserted - the company's own user count is the only defensible headline. Pricing ($19-79/mo) is confirmed first-party; the homepage does offer a 1-month free trial, compatible with the card's 'no free tier' claim but should be stated precisely.

sellerboardrevenue.value

wasabout $4-8M/yr

now20K+

the card's '$4-8M/yr' is our own arithmetic (20K sellers x $19/mo x 12) and appears on no page - rule 5 forbids printing it as sourced. sellerboard.com's own homepage states only '20K+ Amazon sellers trust sellerboard' with no revenue figure; a Latka page separately claims $440K revenue for 2025 with about a 4-person team, which cannot be reconciled with 20K+ payers at $19+/mo, so neither number should be asserted - the company's own user count is the only defensible headline. Pricing ($19-79/mo) is confirmed first-party; the homepage does offer a 1-month free trial, compatible with the card's 'no free tier' claim but should be stated precisely.

pappersrevenue.original

was(none)

now489K

pappers.fr 403s to WebFetch but loads fine in a real browser, so it is not walled - the filed net-profit figures were read live. Two fixes needed: (1) the card's '€492,823' is false precision - the page prints '489K' for FY2024 (a third party, societe.com, separately shows €492,800 for the same year, but the exact digits are not confirmable from pappers.fr itself), so the card should print €0.49M / 489K without invented cents; the card's €0.49M headline value is itself correct, which is why this is FOUND, not WITHDRAW. (2) the card is now a year stale - FY2025 is filed at €2.99M net profit, 6x FY2024, and should become the new headline. Revenue (chiffre d'affaires) itself is not shown - the company kept its 2025 income statement confidential - only net profit is filed. Any dollar figure on the card is our own FX conversion of a euro filing and must be labeled as such.

koinlyrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $6M-15M band was our own arithmetic dressed as EST; it is on no page. Revenue never disclosed.

koinlyrevenue.label

wasannual revenue (est.)

nowusers

the $6M-15M band was our own arithmetic dressed as EST; it is on no page. Revenue never disclosed.

koinlyrevenue.value

was$6M-15M/yr

now2M+

the $6M-15M band was our own arithmetic dressed as EST; it is on no page. Revenue never disclosed.

idealistarevenue.original

was(none)

nowEUR 300 million+

Online Marketplaces reports, citing 'filings seen by local publication Expansion,' revenues of over EUR 300 million in 2024 (16% year-on-year growth), with Spanish subsidiary Idealista SAU at EUR 159 million (+15%) and EBITDA of EUR 84 million (a 10% decrease from 2023) - all confirmed on the opened page, matching the card. This is a journalist reading a filing, so the badge stays STATED, which the card's revenue.sourced already is; nobody in the chain gives a reader a direct route to the statutory document (the cited AIM Group page 403s to a bot). The card's revenue_sentence wording 'From filed accounts' overclaims and should be reworded to 'per filings seen by Expansion, reported by Online Marketplaces.' The '$325M'/'$172M' dollar figures on the card are our own EUR-to-USD conversion, not printed by the source. The EUR 2.9 billion Cinven figure is enterprise value, not revenue, which the card already states correctly.

greenlightgururevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page prints 'about $20-30M ARR' - that band is our own synthesis across three disagreeing trackers, not a source; the single tracker the card does cite, Latka, actually states 'In 2025, Greenlight Guru's revenue reached $16M,' contradicting even the card's own low end. The live homepage states '1,000+ Medical Device companies trust our AI-powered platform,' while the card's stale '1,200+ customers' is sourced to an aggregator (businessmodelcanvastemplate.com) rather than the company's own current count. The $120M+ funding figure should route to MedCity News (June 15, 2021: 'more than $120 million,' 'more than 500 medical device customers' at the time), not PitchBook - JMI Equity's own release announces the investment without disclosing an amount.

greenlightgururevenue.label

wasest ARR - private

nowmedical device companies

no page prints 'about $20-30M ARR' - that band is our own synthesis across three disagreeing trackers, not a source; the single tracker the card does cite, Latka, actually states 'In 2025, Greenlight Guru's revenue reached $16M,' contradicting even the card's own low end. The live homepage states '1,000+ Medical Device companies trust our AI-powered platform,' while the card's stale '1,200+ customers' is sourced to an aggregator (businessmodelcanvastemplate.com) rather than the company's own current count. The $120M+ funding figure should route to MedCity News (June 15, 2021: 'more than $120 million,' 'more than 500 medical device customers' at the time), not PitchBook - JMI Equity's own release announces the investment without disclosing an amount.

greenlightgururevenue.value

wasabout $20-30M ARR

now1,000+

no page prints 'about $20-30M ARR' - that band is our own synthesis across three disagreeing trackers, not a source; the single tracker the card does cite, Latka, actually states 'In 2025, Greenlight Guru's revenue reached $16M,' contradicting even the card's own low end. The live homepage states '1,000+ Medical Device companies trust our AI-powered platform,' while the card's stale '1,200+ customers' is sourced to an aggregator (businessmodelcanvastemplate.com) rather than the company's own current count. The $120M+ funding figure should route to MedCity News (June 15, 2021: 'more than $120 million,' 'more than 500 medical device customers' at the time), not PitchBook - JMI Equity's own release announces the investment without disclosing an amount.

geocachingrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card's 'about $20-30M' is our own estimate from roughly 90 staff times a roughly $40/yr subscription price - our own arithmetic laundered into a headline revenue figure, and no page prints it. Geocaching's own newsroom Fast Facts page states more than 3.4 million active geocaches in 191 countries on all seven continents, more than 1.2 billion 'Found it' and 'Event Attended' logs, over 361,000 geocache owners, and approximately 90 employees - all confirmed on the opened page, including the 90 employees and the origin story. Premium member count is genuinely not public, which is exactly why the dropped estimate had to rely on multiplication. The $39.99/yr price was not re-opened this pass.

geocachingrevenue.label

wasest. yearly, private

nowactive geocaches worldwide

the card's 'about $20-30M' is our own estimate from roughly 90 staff times a roughly $40/yr subscription price - our own arithmetic laundered into a headline revenue figure, and no page prints it. Geocaching's own newsroom Fast Facts page states more than 3.4 million active geocaches in 191 countries on all seven continents, more than 1.2 billion 'Found it' and 'Event Attended' logs, over 361,000 geocache owners, and approximately 90 employees - all confirmed on the opened page, including the 90 employees and the origin story. Premium member count is genuinely not public, which is exactly why the dropped estimate had to rely on multiplication. The $39.99/yr price was not re-opened this pass.

geocachingrevenue.value

wasabout $20-30M

now3.4M+

the card's 'about $20-30M' is our own estimate from roughly 90 staff times a roughly $40/yr subscription price - our own arithmetic laundered into a headline revenue figure, and no page prints it. Geocaching's own newsroom Fast Facts page states more than 3.4 million active geocaches in 191 countries on all seven continents, more than 1.2 billion 'Found it' and 'Event Attended' logs, over 361,000 geocache owners, and approximately 90 employees - all confirmed on the opened page, including the 90 employees and the origin story. Premium member count is genuinely not public, which is exactly why the dropped estimate had to rely on multiplication. The $39.99/yr price was not re-opened this pass.

freetaxusarevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card's '$35-100M/yr' is a range stitched from two unnamed third-party aggregators; an EST badge requires naming the estimator, and the card names nobody, so it cannot stand - the 3x spread itself signals nobody actually knows. TaxHawk, Inc. is private and files no public accounts, so no first-party revenue exists to find. The live homepage (403s to WebFetch, opened in a real browser) states 'We've filed over 82 million tax returns with the IRS' and shows no revenue figure anywhere on the site. The pricing page ($0 federal / $15.99 state) was not re-opened this pass and should be treated as unverified rather than confirmed.

freetaxusarevenue.label

wasprivate, third-party est.

nowtax returns filed with IRS

the card's '$35-100M/yr' is a range stitched from two unnamed third-party aggregators; an EST badge requires naming the estimator, and the card names nobody, so it cannot stand - the 3x spread itself signals nobody actually knows. TaxHawk, Inc. is private and files no public accounts, so no first-party revenue exists to find. The live homepage (403s to WebFetch, opened in a real browser) states 'We've filed over 82 million tax returns with the IRS' and shows no revenue figure anywhere on the site. The pricing page ($0 federal / $15.99 state) was not re-opened this pass and should be treated as unverified rather than confirmed.

freetaxusarevenue.value

was$35-100M/yr

now82M+

the card's '$35-100M/yr' is a range stitched from two unnamed third-party aggregators; an EST badge requires naming the estimator, and the card names nobody, so it cannot stand - the 3x spread itself signals nobody actually knows. TaxHawk, Inc. is private and files no public accounts, so no first-party revenue exists to find. The live homepage (403s to WebFetch, opened in a real browser) states 'We've filed over 82 million tax returns with the IRS' and shows no revenue figure anywhere on the site. The pricing page ($0 federal / $15.99 state) was not re-opened this pass and should be treated as unverified rather than confirmed.

focusnferevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no Focus NFe page anywhere prints a revenue figure; the card's 'about $5-15M/yr' is our own estimate built from staff count times published per-note pricing, our arithmetic, not a source. The homepage's own counters state 50,000+ client companies served, 1B+ invoices processed, 3,000+ integrated municipalities, and 26+ integrated states (Brazilian Portuguese 'bilhao' = 10^9, so '1B+' is a correct read). The /sobre-a-focus-nfe page gives the origin story (Acras Sistemas founded 2005, Focus NFe launched 2008) but says only 'milhares de empresas' (thousands) and states no revenue. The 26-staff Econodata figure that fed the dropped estimate was not re-verified this pass.

focusnferevenue.label

wasEst. ARR (undisclosed)

nowclient companies

no Focus NFe page anywhere prints a revenue figure; the card's 'about $5-15M/yr' is our own estimate built from staff count times published per-note pricing, our arithmetic, not a source. The homepage's own counters state 50,000+ client companies served, 1B+ invoices processed, 3,000+ integrated municipalities, and 26+ integrated states (Brazilian Portuguese 'bilhao' = 10^9, so '1B+' is a correct read). The /sobre-a-focus-nfe page gives the origin story (Acras Sistemas founded 2005, Focus NFe launched 2008) but says only 'milhares de empresas' (thousands) and states no revenue. The 26-staff Econodata figure that fed the dropped estimate was not re-verified this pass.

focusnferevenue.value

wasAbout $5-15M/yr

now50,000+

no Focus NFe page anywhere prints a revenue figure; the card's 'about $5-15M/yr' is our own estimate built from staff count times published per-note pricing, our arithmetic, not a source. The homepage's own counters state 50,000+ client companies served, 1B+ invoices processed, 3,000+ integrated municipalities, and 26+ integrated states (Brazilian Portuguese 'bilhao' = 10^9, so '1B+' is a correct read). The /sobre-a-focus-nfe page gives the origin story (Acras Sistemas founded 2005, Focus NFe launched 2008) but says only 'milhares de empresas' (thousands) and states no revenue. The 26-staff Econodata figure that fed the dropped estimate was not re-verified this pass.

expresstrucktaxrevenue.value

wasabout $6M/yr

nowUndisclosed

the 'about $6M/yr' figure fails on subject, not just sourcing: it was an aggregator's estimate for the whole SPAN Enterprises group (which also owned TaxBandits, ExpressExtension, and others), never for ExpressTruckTax alone - and ExpressTruckTax left SPAN in 2022, so the estimate no longer even describes the right company. The Bestpass/Fleetworthy acquisition release (PRNewswire) discloses no price and no revenue, and attributes the card's scale metrics ('over 200,000 businesses,' 'e-filing services for over 5 million trucks') to SPAN, the parent, not to ExpressTruckTax specifically - both are mislabeled on the card. No first-party replacement exists: the ExpressTruckTax homepage prints no counts, fleetworthy.com/about does not name the product, and the old Bestpass press page now redirects to fleetworthy.com/about. The only product-specific figures found are prices on expresstrucktax.com/pricing/ ($19.90 for one truck up to $229.90 for Enterprise, 500+ vehicles) - even the card's own correction note is wrong here, citing a $379.90 top tier that the page does not show. Nothing countable remains to headline, so the revenue line comes off rather than being replaced.

dedaorevenue.original

was(none)

nowRMB 843 million

Chinese financial press (Securities Times, syndicated), covering the August 2022 withdrawal of Beijing Siwei Zaowu's (Dedao's operating entity) IPO application, states operating revenue of RMB 628 million (2019), RMB 675 million (2020), and RMB 843 million (2021), read from the IPO prospectus. The number originates in a regulatory filing, but our route to it is a reporter, so the badge is STATED, not FILED. The card's dollar conversion (about $130M at roughly 6.45 RMB/USD) is our own arithmetic, not printed by the source. This is annual total revenue of the listing entity for FY2021 only - not GMV, not the app alone.

cults3drevenue.original

was(none)

nowEUR 868,600

societe.com's rendering of Cults' (SIREN 810522318) French registry filing confirms both that turnover (chiffre d'affaires) is withheld under a confidentiality declaration and that the net result is disclosed. The page prints FY2023 net result as EUR 868,600 (the card's EUR 868,555 is off - print the source's own rounded figure), and now also shows FY2024 net result of EUR 1,182,500, up 37%. Badge is downgraded from FILED to STATED-via-registry: this reads societe.com's rendering of the registry, not the deposited PDF itself (pappers.fr 403s to WebFetch), so the origin in a filing is not in doubt but our route to the paper is a registry aggregator. This is net PROFIT sitting in the revenue slot - correctly labelled as such, since true turnover is legally hidden under the small-company confidentiality threshold.

carrotrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card badged this EST and called it a third-party review-site estimate - that provenance was wrong. The figure ('Carrot currently has 8,000 customers and generates about $13M/year') is host show notes relaying founder Trevor Mauch directly, published 5 January 2023, so it is STATED, not EST. Two conflicts found on other opened pages: Mauch's own press kit (trevormauch.com/press) prints a smaller, undated $10 million and 6,000+ customers, likely an older snapshot; and Inc.com's Carrot profile discloses no revenue at all, only Inc. 5000 ranks (No. 4,486 in 2022, No. 2,509 in 2021, No. 1,830 in 2020, No. 1,235 in 2019, No. 699 in 2018) confirming the '5x honoree' metric. Print $13M/yr as a dated, founder-sourced figure, not an undated current fact.

barkcomrevenue.original

was(none)

nowGBP 70 million

co-founder Kai Feller's own website states that by 2022 Bark.com had revenue of GBP 70 million and profit of GBP 15 million, and was acquired for GBP 240 million; the source prints pounds only, so dollar figures on the card are our own conversion. The card's FILED badge is not supportable and must come down to STATED: the FY2022 Companies House accounts exist but are a scanned image PDF with no text layer, unreadable by any tool here, and FILED cannot be earned by linking a document nobody read. Wikipedia repeats the same figures sourced to Feller, so it is an echo, not independent confirmation. Later accounts (FY2023, FY2024, amended FY2024) are now filed, so this figure is two years stale.

barkcomrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

co-founder Kai Feller's own website states that by 2022 Bark.com had revenue of GBP 70 million and profit of GBP 15 million, and was acquired for GBP 240 million; the source prints pounds only, so dollar figures on the card are our own conversion. The card's FILED badge is not supportable and must come down to STATED: the FY2022 Companies House accounts exist but are a scanned image PDF with no text layer, unreadable by any tool here, and FILED cannot be earned by linking a document nobody read. Wikipedia repeats the same figures sourced to Feller, so it is an echo, not independent confirmation. Later accounts (FY2023, FY2024, amended FY2024) are now filed, so this figure is two years stale.

gtowizardrevenue.value

wasUndisclosed

nowUndisclosed

'$20M+ ARR' is entirely our own inference from a 51-200 employee band on a jobs-board aggregator, and the card's own honesty note already admits it is our read; no page prints it. gtowizard.com makes only qualitative claims with no user count; PokerNews' pricing page carries tiers but explicitly no user, revenue, or scale figure. Only provable numbers are subscription tiers $39 (Starter) to $229 (Ultra) per month, not the stale '$39-129,' and official PokerGO/PGT strategy-partner status.

cleartaxrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the cited page is Entrackr, a journalist reading MCA filings. We did not open the filing. Journalist-relayed is STATED.

timeerevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the cited page is Staffing Industry Analysts, a trade journalist reading the results. Journalist-relayed is STATED.

noterevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the cited page is note's IR post, not the exchange filing. The company talking is STATED.

workivarevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the cited page is Workiva's own earnings press release, not the 10-K. The company talking is STATED.

gtowizardrevenue.value

was$20M+ ARR

nowUndisclosed

'$20M+ ARR' is entirely our own inference from a 51-200 employee band on a jobs-board aggregator, and the card's own honesty note already admits it is our read; no page prints it. gtowizard.com makes only qualitative claims with no user count; PokerNews' pricing page carries tiers but explicitly no user, revenue, or scale figure. Only provable numbers are subscription tiers $39 (Starter) to $229 (Ultra) per month, not the stale '$39-129,' and official PokerGO/PGT strategy-partner status.

foundryvttrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries $3-10M/yr — the card admits it's a wide estimate triangulated from headcount and an unopened, bot-walled ZoomInfo page. The $710,981 Kickstarter raise funds Ember, a separate original game, not VTT license revenue, and must never sit in the revenue slot.

foundryvttrevenue.label

wasest.; undisclosed

nowDiscord community members

no page carries $3-10M/yr — the card admits it's a wide estimate triangulated from headcount and an unopened, bot-walled ZoomInfo page. The $710,981 Kickstarter raise funds Ember, a separate original game, not VTT license revenue, and must never sit in the revenue slot.

foundryvttrevenue.value

was$3-10M/yr

nowabout 100K

no page carries $3-10M/yr — the card admits it's a wide estimate triangulated from headcount and an unopened, bot-walled ZoomInfo page. The $710,981 Kickstarter raise funds Ember, a separate original game, not VTT license revenue, and must never sit in the revenue slot.

dropmagicrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries $1M+ ARR — that was our annualization of a founder claim. The TrustMRR post's $58,250 is the SUM of two products (Dropmagic + Blime); Dropmagic alone is the $58K line. The post's 'November 2026' is a founder typo for November 2025 (the post itself is dated Dec 3). The unverified $117K MRR figure from a third-party newsletter should not outrank the verified $58K in the headline slot.

dropmagicrevenue.label

wasfounder-stated, 2026

nowMRR, TrustMRR verified

no page carries $1M+ ARR — that was our annualization of a founder claim. The TrustMRR post's $58,250 is the SUM of two products (Dropmagic + Blime); Dropmagic alone is the $58K line. The post's 'November 2026' is a founder typo for November 2025 (the post itself is dated Dec 3). The unverified $117K MRR figure from a third-party newsletter should not outrank the verified $58K in the headline slot.

dropmagicrevenue.value

was$1M+

now$58K

no page carries $1M+ ARR — that was our annualization of a founder claim. The TrustMRR post's $58,250 is the SUM of two products (Dropmagic + Blime); Dropmagic alone is the $58K line. The post's 'November 2026' is a founder typo for November 2025 (the post itself is dated Dec 3). The unverified $117K MRR figure from a third-party newsletter should not outrank the verified $58K in the headline slot.

discogsrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries about $30M — the card's own honesty text stacks three assumptions atop a decade-old 2015 NYT figure. Discogs (Zink Media) is private and reports unit volume only; items sold is a marketplace GMV-side unit count, not company revenue, and the live discogs.com report page is bot-walled (readable only via Wayback).

discogsrevenue.label

was9% fee on records sold

nowitems sold

no page carries about $30M — the card's own honesty text stacks three assumptions atop a decade-old 2015 NYT figure. Discogs (Zink Media) is private and reports unit volume only; items sold is a marketplace GMV-side unit count, not company revenue, and the live discogs.com report page is bot-walled (readable only via Wayback).

discogsrevenue.value

wasabout $30M

now15.6M+

no page carries about $30M — the card's own honesty text stacks three assumptions atop a decade-old 2015 NYT figure. Discogs (Zink Media) is private and reports unit volume only; items sold is a marketplace GMV-side unit count, not company revenue, and the live discogs.com report page is bot-walled (readable only via Wayback).

skebrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

this is the Bandcamp failure mode: about $5M/yr was GMV (JPY700M monthly transaction volume) x an assumed about 10% take rate, but ITmedia states the fee is up to 13.6%, not 10%. Skeb publishes transaction volume, never revenue. Yen figures must print as yen with USD marked as a conversion, not the reverse.

skebrevenue.label

wasest. about 10% of GMV

nowregistered users

this is the Bandcamp failure mode: about $5M/yr was GMV (JPY700M monthly transaction volume) x an assumed about 10% take rate, but ITmedia states the fee is up to 13.6%, not 10%. Skeb publishes transaction volume, never revenue. Yen figures must print as yen with USD marked as a conversion, not the reverse.

skebrevenue.value

wasabout $5M/yr

now3.5M+

this is the Bandcamp failure mode: about $5M/yr was GMV (JPY700M monthly transaction volume) x an assumed about 10% take rate, but ITmedia states the fee is up to 13.6%, not 10%. Skeb publishes transaction volume, never revenue. Yen figures must print as yen with USD marked as a conversion, not the reverse.

matchplayrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries $50-150K/yr — it is our estimate from user count x freemium tiers, and the founder frames paid tiers as community support rather than a revenue product, making a users x price model especially unsafe. Separately: this card's live revenue_sentence field is shipping the literal unrendered placeholder string 'rev_line_value' and must be fixed regardless of verdict.

matchplayrevenue.label

wasour est · undisclosed

nowregistered users

no page carries $50-150K/yr — it is our estimate from user count x freemium tiers, and the founder frames paid tiers as community support rather than a revenue product, making a users x price model especially unsafe. Separately: this card's live revenue_sentence field is shipping the literal unrendered placeholder string 'rev_line_value' and must be fixed regardless of verdict.

matchplayrevenue.value

was$50-150K/yr

nowabout 25,000

no page carries $50-150K/yr — it is our estimate from user count x freemium tiers, and the founder frames paid tiers as community support rather than a revenue product, making a users x price model especially unsafe. Separately: this card's live revenue_sentence field is shipping the literal unrendered placeholder string 'rev_line_value' and must be fixed regardless of verdict.

udiscrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries $4-6M/yr — the card's own honesty text spells out the derivation (1.4M users x an invented 10-15% conversion x $29.99), which is our arithmetic, not a source. Third-party trackers cited in the card (Growjo about $3.6M, LeadIQ about $1.8M) disagree with each other and were never opened.

udiscrevenue.label

wasest: $30/yr Pro subs

nowyearly app users

no page carries $4-6M/yr — the card's own honesty text spells out the derivation (1.4M users x an invented 10-15% conversion x $29.99), which is our arithmetic, not a source. Third-party trackers cited in the card (Growjo about $3.6M, LeadIQ about $1.8M) disagree with each other and were never opened.

udiscrevenue.value

wasabout $4-6M/yr

now1.4M

no page carries $4-6M/yr — the card's own honesty text spells out the derivation (1.4M users x an invented 10-15% conversion x $29.99), which is our arithmetic, not a source. Third-party trackers cited in the card (Growjo about $3.6M, LeadIQ about $1.8M) disagree with each other and were never opened.

equalizedigitalrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries about $1M/yr — the card's own honesty text already concedes it was a rough estimate from install count x list price x assumed team size. The funding amount is explicitly undisclosed (WP Tavern), and WP Tavern also states paid upgrades are only a small share of revenue, undercutting any pricing-based revenue model.

equalizedigitalrevenue.label

wasest. total, mostly services

nowactive WordPress installs

no page carries about $1M/yr — the card's own honesty text already concedes it was a rough estimate from install count x list price x assumed team size. The funding amount is explicitly undisclosed (WP Tavern), and WP Tavern also states paid upgrades are only a small share of revenue, undercutting any pricing-based revenue model.

equalizedigitalrevenue.value

wasabout $1M/yr

now10,000+

no page carries about $1M/yr — the card's own honesty text already concedes it was a rough estimate from install count x list price x assumed team size. The funding amount is explicitly undisclosed (WP Tavern), and WP Tavern also states paid upgrades are only a small share of revenue, undercutting any pricing-based revenue model.

servicem8revenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page anywhere carries $4-5M — that was our own triangulation across disagreeing trackers, and the one we actually cited (Growjo) prints $2M, so our headline was 2 to 2.5x the number we sourced it to. The card's '$50 billion worth of jobs billed' is customer GMV passing through the app, not ServiceM8's revenue, and must stay labeled as a usage metric.

servicem8revenue.label

wasest. yearly, undisclosed

nowjobs managed

no page anywhere carries $4-5M — that was our own triangulation across disagreeing trackers, and the one we actually cited (Growjo) prints $2M, so our headline was 2 to 2.5x the number we sourced it to. The card's '$50 billion worth of jobs billed' is customer GMV passing through the app, not ServiceM8's revenue, and must stay labeled as a usage metric.

servicem8revenue.value

wasabout $4-5M

now50M+

no page anywhere carries $4-5M — that was our own triangulation across disagreeing trackers, and the one we actually cited (Growjo) prints $2M, so our headline was 2 to 2.5x the number we sourced it to. The card's '$50 billion worth of jobs billed' is customer GMV passing through the app, not ServiceM8's revenue, and must stay labeled as a usage metric.

123sheetsrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $1M/yr figure stacked two guesses: 35,000 x an assumed about $50/yr renewal price, which the card's own honesty note admits is inflated versus the roughly-half price most listings advertise for year one. UK micro-entity accounts legally omit turnover, so Companies House can't settle it either.

123sheetsrevenue.label

wasyearly · our estimate

nowentities filing

the $1M/yr figure stacked two guesses: 35,000 x an assumed about $50/yr renewal price, which the card's own honesty note admits is inflated versus the roughly-half price most listings advertise for year one. UK micro-entity accounts legally omit turnover, so Companies House can't settle it either.

123sheetsrevenue.value

was$1M/yr

now35,000+

the $1M/yr figure stacked two guesses: 35,000 x an assumed about $50/yr renewal price, which the card's own honesty note admits is inflated versus the roughly-half price most listings advertise for year one. UK micro-entity accounts legally omit turnover, so Companies House can't settle it either.

savvycalrevenue.label

wasfounder-disclosed, 2021

nowMRR, founder-stated

the card's $250K ARR was our own arithmetic run backwards from a monthly figure — a month is not a year — and its 'about $20,833 MRR' precision was manufactured, not sourced. The Product Hunt AMA says only 'crossed $20k MRR'; that founder-stated MRR is the real number.

savvycalrevenue.value

was$250K ARR

now$20K+

the card's $250K ARR was our own arithmetic run backwards from a monthly figure — a month is not a year — and its 'about $20,833 MRR' precision was manufactured, not sourced. The Product Hunt AMA says only 'crossed $20k MRR'; that founder-stated MRR is the real number.

opensnowrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the printed $5.9M/yr was an Owler estimate from a page that timed out for us and was never read. The ColoradoBiz '80% from subscriptions' claim (403 to bots) and the '3M email subscribers' figure (mis-attributed to a source not even in the card's own list) are both unsupported. Replaced with the founder's own bootstrapped, no-outside-capital statement.

opensnowrevenue.label

wasAnnual revenue (est.)

nowoutside capital raised

the printed $5.9M/yr was an Owler estimate from a page that timed out for us and was never read. The ColoradoBiz '80% from subscriptions' claim (403 to bots) and the '3M email subscribers' figure (mis-attributed to a source not even in the card's own list) are both unsupported. Replaced with the founder's own bootstrapped, no-outside-capital statement.

opensnowrevenue.value

was$5.9M/yr

now$0

the printed $5.9M/yr was an Owler estimate from a page that timed out for us and was never read. The ColoradoBiz '80% from subscriptions' claim (403 to bots) and the '3M email subscribers' figure (mis-attributed to a source not even in the card's own list) are both unsupported. Replaced with the founder's own bootstrapped, no-outside-capital statement.

recitemerevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about GBP5M ARR was the card's own low-confidence guess from headcount; no page states revenue. Dollar conversions were ours, not BGF's, so the source's own GBP figure is printed as-is. Also unresolved: reciteme.com/our-story dates founding to 2009 vs BGF's 2012.

recitemerevenue.label

wasest. ARR; undisclosed

nowtotal BGF investment

about GBP5M ARR was the card's own low-confidence guess from headcount; no page states revenue. Dollar conversions were ours, not BGF's, so the source's own GBP figure is printed as-is. Also unresolved: reciteme.com/our-story dates founding to 2009 vs BGF's 2012.

recitemerevenue.value

wasabout £5M ($6.5M)

now£8.8M

about GBP5M ARR was the card's own low-confidence guess from headcount; no page states revenue. Dollar conversions were ours, not BGF's, so the source's own GBP figure is printed as-is. Also unresolved: reciteme.com/our-story dates founding to 2009 vs BGF's 2012.

cointrackingrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $2M+/yr was an Owler/Prospeo-class guess with no page behind it; CoinTracking GmbH's statutory financials are paywalled at NorthData. Two other card defects: '25K corporate clients' is wrong (site says 15,000+), and the homepage's $41.5B 'Portfolio Value' is customer assets tracked, not company revenue.

cointrackingrevenue.label

was3rd-party estimate

nowactive users

about $2M+/yr was an Owler/Prospeo-class guess with no page behind it; CoinTracking GmbH's statutory financials are paywalled at NorthData. Two other card defects: '25K corporate clients' is wrong (site says 15,000+), and the homepage's $41.5B 'Portfolio Value' is customer assets tracked, not company revenue.

cointrackingrevenue.value

wasabout $2M+/yr

now2.2M+

about $2M+/yr was an Owler/Prospeo-class guess with no page behind it; CoinTracking GmbH's statutory financials are paywalled at NorthData. Two other card defects: '25K corporate clients' is wrong (site says 15,000+), and the homepage's $41.5B 'Portfolio Value' is customer assets tracked, not company revenue.

shopvoxrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $6M/yr was a Growjo/Owler machine estimate from a page that timed out for us and was never opened. The card's Intuit case-study link is dead (301s to a generic Medium index); replaced with the sourced 2017 customer count from Intuit's own press release.

shopvoxrevenue.label

wasest. revenue, unfunded

nowcustomers worldwide

about $6M/yr was a Growjo/Owler machine estimate from a page that timed out for us and was never opened. The card's Intuit case-study link is dead (301s to a generic Medium index); replaced with the sourced 2017 customer count from Intuit's own press release.

shopvoxrevenue.value

wasabout $6M/yr

now3,000+

about $6M/yr was a Growjo/Owler machine estimate from a page that timed out for us and was never opened. The card's Intuit case-study link is dead (301s to a generic Medium index); replaced with the sourced 2017 customer count from Intuit's own press release.

soundslicerevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

rule 4 applies: this must not become '$500K revenue'. It is the creators' cumulative cut from the Soundslice store; Soundslice's own blog states the company keeps only 15% of store sales. The card's 'about $1M/yr' headline appears on no page and was our own arithmetic; soundslice.com/about carries no numbers at all despite being cited for several.

soundslicerevenue.label

wasEst · bootstrapped, 3 staff

nowcourse-creator earnings

rule 4 applies: this must not become '$500K revenue'. It is the creators' cumulative cut from the Soundslice store; Soundslice's own blog states the company keeps only 15% of store sales. The card's 'about $1M/yr' headline appears on no page and was our own arithmetic; soundslice.com/about carries no numbers at all despite being cited for several.

soundslicerevenue.value

wasabout $1M/yr

now$500K+

rule 4 applies: this must not become '$500K revenue'. It is the creators' cumulative cut from the Soundslice store; Soundslice's own blog states the company keeps only 15% of store sales. The card's 'about $1M/yr' headline appears on no page and was our own arithmetic; soundslice.com/about carries no numbers at all despite being cited for several.

legendkeeperrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $250K/yr exists nowhere on any page — 222 patrons x $9 doesn't reach it, and the 'thousands of users' claim the card leans on isn't supported by any page we could open (the founder interview contains no numbers at all). 222 paid Patreon members is the largest real, printed figure available.

legendkeeperrevenue.label

wasARR (our estimate)

nowpaid Patreon members

about $250K/yr exists nowhere on any page — 222 patrons x $9 doesn't reach it, and the 'thousands of users' claim the card leans on isn't supported by any page we could open (the founder interview contains no numbers at all). 222 paid Patreon members is the largest real, printed figure available.

legendkeeperrevenue.value

wasabout $250K/yr

now222

about $250K/yr exists nowhere on any page — 222 patrons x $9 doesn't reach it, and the 'thousands of users' claim the card leans on isn't supported by any page we could open (the founder interview contains no numbers at all). 222 paid Patreon members is the largest real, printed figure available.

storecoverevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $2-4M ARR was our inference from headcount, by the card's own admission. The 10th-anniversary post gives countries, offices, and tenure but nothing financial; the card's $159K VC-raised and 13-employees figures ride on Crunchbase/Tracxn pages we could not open.

storecoverevenue.label

wasARR (est., undisclosed)

nowcountries, API compliance

about $2-4M ARR was our inference from headcount, by the card's own admission. The 10th-anniversary post gives countries, offices, and tenure but nothing financial; the card's $159K VC-raised and 13-employees figures ride on Crunchbase/Tracxn pages we could not open.

storecoverevenue.value

wasabout $2-4M

now31

about $2-4M ARR was our inference from headcount, by the card's own admission. The 10th-anniversary post gives countries, offices, and tenure but nothing financial; the card's $159K VC-raised and 13-employees figures ride on Crunchbase/Tracxn pages we could not open.

astrobinrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $350K/yr was our own arithmetic (8,000 assumed payers x CHF tiers), a number nobody published. The card's '1M+ images hosted' and '20K+ astrophotographers' were also mis-cited to this About page, which states neither — only the 10,000+ daily-members figure.

astrobinrevenue.label

wasest. subscriptions

nowactive members daily

about $350K/yr was our own arithmetic (8,000 assumed payers x CHF tiers), a number nobody published. The card's '1M+ images hosted' and '20K+ astrophotographers' were also mis-cited to this About page, which states neither — only the 10,000+ daily-members figure.

astrobinrevenue.value

wasabout $350K/yr

now10,000+

about $350K/yr was our own arithmetic (8,000 assumed payers x CHF tiers), a number nobody published. The card's '1M+ images hosted' and '20K+ astrophotographers' were also mis-cited to this About page, which states neither — only the 10,000+ daily-members figure.

wisesheetsrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

$400K-700K/yr was our estimate (users x assumed conversion x list price); the release explicitly states no revenue, no ARR, and no paying-customer count. The card's 'thousands of paying customers' claim is not in the release either and should be dropped.

wisesheetsrevenue.label

wasest. ARR (private)

nowusers

$400K-700K/yr was our estimate (users x assumed conversion x list price); the release explicitly states no revenue, no ARR, and no paying-customer count. The card's 'thousands of paying customers' claim is not in the release either and should be dropped.

wisesheetsrevenue.value

was$400K-700K/yr

now70,000+

$400K-700K/yr was our estimate (users x assumed conversion x list price); the release explicitly states no revenue, no ARR, and no paying-customer count. The card's 'thousands of paying customers' claim is not in the release either and should be dropped.

labstarrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

$1-3M/yr was our estimate (600 labs x an unverified about $250/mo review-site price); the acquirer's press release discloses neither deal terms nor revenue on either side. Replaced with the sourced lab count and acquisition.

labstarrevenue.label

wasEST: 600 labs, monthly subs

nowdental labs worldwide

$1-3M/yr was our estimate (600 labs x an unverified about $250/mo review-site price); the acquirer's press release discloses neither deal terms nor revenue on either side. Replaced with the sourced lab count and acquisition.

labstarrevenue.value

wasest. $1-3M/yr

nowabout 600

$1-3M/yr was our estimate (600 labs x an unverified about $250/mo review-site price); the acquirer's press release discloses neither deal terms nor revenue on either side. Replaced with the sourced lab count and acquisition.

ownerrezrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $7M was RocketReach's unopened estimate. The card's $1B+/yr guest-bookings figure is GMV across OwnerRez's users, not company revenue — must be labeled GMV and never sit in the revenue slot (Bandcamp failure mode).

ownerrezrevenue.label

wasest. yearly revenue

nowactive properties

about $7M was RocketReach's unopened estimate. The card's $1B+/yr guest-bookings figure is GMV across OwnerRez's users, not company revenue — must be labeled GMV and never sit in the revenue slot (Bandcamp failure mode).

ownerrezrevenue.value

wasabout $7M

now50,000+

about $7M was RocketReach's unopened estimate. The card's $1B+/yr guest-bookings figure is GMV across OwnerRez's users, not company revenue — must be labeled GMV and never sit in the revenue slot (Bandcamp failure mode).

cattlemaxrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

about $2M/yr was our bottom-up estimate (8,000 x $200-300); third-party broker estimates the card cites ($1.8M vs $12.7M) were never opened and disagree wildly. cattlemax.com itself does not print 8,000 anywhere — that figure lives on the company's LinkedIn page, not the site the card actually cited.

cattlemaxrevenue.label

was8,000+ ranches, bootstrapped

nowfarms and ranches

about $2M/yr was our bottom-up estimate (8,000 x $200-300); third-party broker estimates the card cites ($1.8M vs $12.7M) were never opened and disagree wildly. cattlemax.com itself does not print 8,000 anywhere — that figure lives on the company's LinkedIn page, not the site the card actually cited.

cattlemaxrevenue.value

wasabout $2M/yr

now8,000+

about $2M/yr was our bottom-up estimate (8,000 x $200-300); third-party broker estimates the card cites ($1.8M vs $12.7M) were never opened and disagree wildly. cattlemax.com itself does not print 8,000 anywhere — that figure lives on the company's LinkedIn page, not the site the card actually cited.

shodanrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $1M+/yr figure was explicitly our own floor estimate with no source. Wikipedia carries no revenue, funding, or pricing; shodan.io/pricing 404s and the member store is login-gated, so the card's price tiers are unverifiable by us and sourced only to a third-party aggregator, not Shodan.

shodanrevenue.label

wasBootstrapped, no VC · est

nowregistered users

the $1M+/yr figure was explicitly our own floor estimate with no source. Wikipedia carries no revenue, funding, or pricing; shodan.io/pricing 404s and the member store is login-gated, so the card's price tiers are unverifiable by us and sourced only to a third-party aggregator, not Shodan.

shodanrevenue.value

was$1M+ /yr

now3M+

the $1M+/yr figure was explicitly our own floor estimate with no source. Wikipedia carries no revenue, funding, or pricing; shodan.io/pricing 404s and the member store is login-gated, so the card's price tiers are unverifiable by us and sourced only to a third-party aggregator, not Shodan.

jobtreadrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $15M+ ARR figure was our own 7,500 x $199/mo multiplication assuming every customer pays the base tier — not a source. Neither JobTread page discloses revenue; Deloitte's US$5M figure is their award eligibility floor, not JobTread's actual number.

jobtreadrevenue.label

wasest., bootstrapped

nowcontractor customers

the $15M+ ARR figure was our own 7,500 x $199/mo multiplication assuming every customer pays the base tier — not a source. Neither JobTread page discloses revenue; Deloitte's US$5M figure is their award eligibility floor, not JobTread's actual number.

jobtreadrevenue.value

was$15M+ ARR

now7,500+

the $15M+ ARR figure was our own 7,500 x $199/mo multiplication assuming every customer pays the base tier — not a source. Neither JobTread page discloses revenue; Deloitte's US$5M figure is their award eligibility floor, not JobTread's actual number.

pricechartingrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $2-5M/yr estimate was our inference from the Inc. 5000 eligibility floor plus an unopened ZoomInfo estimate; the Inc. profile prints rank and growth but no revenue dollar figure anywhere. Replaced with the sourced user count from PriceCharting's own press release.

pricechartingrevenue.label

wasest · Inc. 5000 2025

nowmonthly users

the $2-5M/yr estimate was our inference from the Inc. 5000 eligibility floor plus an unopened ZoomInfo estimate; the Inc. profile prints rank and growth but no revenue dollar figure anywhere. Replaced with the sourced user count from PriceCharting's own press release.

pricechartingrevenue.value

was$2-5M/yr

now3.5M

the $2-5M/yr estimate was our inference from the Inc. 5000 eligibility floor plus an unopened ZoomInfo estimate; the Inc. profile prints rank and growth but no revenue dollar figure anywhere. Replaced with the sourced user count from PriceCharting's own press release.

swapparevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card's $100M+ (2021) figure was falsely cited to a PYMNTS article that contains no Swappa financial figures at all, and about $3M/yr was our own GMV x assumed-take-rate arithmetic. GMV is not company revenue (Bandcamp failure mode). Swappa's blog is Cloudflare-walled; Wikipedia's sourced series stops at $92M in 2018.

swapparevenue.label

wasest. 3% of $100M+ GMV

nowseller proceeds (GMV)

the card's $100M+ (2021) figure was falsely cited to a PYMNTS article that contains no Swappa financial figures at all, and about $3M/yr was our own GMV x assumed-take-rate arithmetic. GMV is not company revenue (Bandcamp failure mode). Swappa's blog is Cloudflare-walled; Wikipedia's sourced series stops at $92M in 2018.

swapparevenue.value

wasabout $3M/yr

now$92M

the card's $100M+ (2021) figure was falsely cited to a PYMNTS article that contains no Swappa financial figures at all, and about $3M/yr was our own GMV x assumed-take-rate arithmetic. GMV is not company revenue (Bandcamp failure mode). Swappa's blog is Cloudflare-walled; Wikipedia's sourced series stops at $92M in 2018.

storygraphrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $2-4M/yr figure was our own conversion-rate arithmetic (users x assumed 1-3% x $50), not a source. No page anywhere publishes a StoryGraph revenue figure; this is signups, not payers, and must be labeled as such.

storygraphrevenue.label

wasEst. ARR, not disclosed

nowuser signups

the $2-4M/yr figure was our own conversion-rate arithmetic (users x assumed 1-3% x $50), not a source. No page anywhere publishes a StoryGraph revenue figure; this is signups, not payers, and must be labeled as such.

storygraphrevenue.value

wasabout $2-4M/yr

now5M+

the $2-4M/yr figure was our own conversion-rate arithmetic (users x assumed 1-3% x $50), not a source. No page anywhere publishes a StoryGraph revenue figure; this is signups, not payers, and must be labeled as such.

tax1099revenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the $30-60M revenue estimate was our own inference from funding plus customer count; no Spectrum Equity page prints revenue or ARR. Latka's $19.1M ARR was never opened and must not replace one unseen number with another. Replaced with the sourced funding raise.

tax1099revenue.label

wasest. revenue (private)

nowraised, first outside round

the $30-60M revenue estimate was our own inference from funding plus customer count; no Spectrum Equity page prints revenue or ARR. Latka's $19.1M ARR was never opened and must not replace one unseen number with another. Replaced with the sourced funding raise.

tax1099revenue.value

was$30-60M

now$163M

the $30-60M revenue estimate was our own inference from funding plus customer count; no Spectrum Equity page prints revenue or ARR. Latka's $19.1M ARR was never opened and must not replace one unseen number with another. Replaced with the sourced funding raise.

recipalrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'about $1M ARR' is a pure guess (public pricing x 'a plausible subscriber base') and appears on no page - the weakest number in this file. ReciPal has never published revenue, customer count, or label count: the homepage says only trusted by thousands of food businesses for over a decade; the pricing page carries $29 one-off / $59 / $129 per month and no counts. The founder's strongest on-record statement, from an Arcadea interview (https://www.arcadeagroup.com/under-the-arc-with-lev-berlin-solo-founder-of-recipal/), is 'We were ramen profitable fairly quickly, and I've continued to bootstrap since then' - vague but first-party, and it beats our invented precise figure.

recipalrevenue.label

wasour estimate, unconfirmed

nowfood businesses, 10+ yrs

'about $1M ARR' is a pure guess (public pricing x 'a plausible subscriber base') and appears on no page - the weakest number in this file. ReciPal has never published revenue, customer count, or label count: the homepage says only trusted by thousands of food businesses for over a decade; the pricing page carries $29 one-off / $59 / $129 per month and no counts. The founder's strongest on-record statement, from an Arcadea interview (https://www.arcadeagroup.com/under-the-arc-with-lev-berlin-solo-founder-of-recipal/), is 'We were ramen profitable fairly quickly, and I've continued to bootstrap since then' - vague but first-party, and it beats our invented precise figure.

recipalrevenue.value

wasabout $1M ARR

nowThousands

'about $1M ARR' is a pure guess (public pricing x 'a plausible subscriber base') and appears on no page - the weakest number in this file. ReciPal has never published revenue, customer count, or label count: the homepage says only trusted by thousands of food businesses for over a decade; the pricing page carries $29 one-off / $59 / $129 per month and no counts. The founder's strongest on-record statement, from an Arcadea interview (https://www.arcadeagroup.com/under-the-arc-with-lev-berlin-solo-founder-of-recipal/), is 'We were ramen profitable fairly quickly, and I've continued to bootstrap since then' - vague but first-party, and it beats our invented precise figure.

worldanvilrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'about $1M+ ARR' is our estimate and the card already says so in-line; no page carries it. World Anvil's own FAQ (403 to WebFetch, opens only in a browser) states it has grown into a community of over 3 million users. Two more issues: the '5M+ worlds built' metric could not be found anywhere on the opened FAQ and needs its own check; the card's dismissal of 'Owler's sub-$1M guess' as 'stale' is our own unverified judgement about a number we did not check, and should come off.

worldanvilrevenue.label

wasARR est · undisclosed

nowusers

'about $1M+ ARR' is our estimate and the card already says so in-line; no page carries it. World Anvil's own FAQ (403 to WebFetch, opens only in a browser) states it has grown into a community of over 3 million users. Two more issues: the '5M+ worlds built' metric could not be found anywhere on the opened FAQ and needs its own check; the card's dismissal of 'Owler's sub-$1M guess' as 'stale' is our own unverified judgement about a number we did not check, and should come off.

worldanvilrevenue.value

wasabout $1M+

now3M+

'about $1M+ ARR' is our estimate and the card already says so in-line; no page carries it. World Anvil's own FAQ (403 to WebFetch, opens only in a browser) states it has grown into a community of over 3 million users. Two more issues: the '5M+ worlds built' metric could not be found anywhere on the opened FAQ and needs its own check; the card's dismissal of 'Owler's sub-$1M guess' as 'stale' is our own unverified judgement about a number we did not check, and should come off.

tebexrevenue.label

wasest · 5% take, 2021

nowsale to Overwolf (2022)

'about $5-7M/yr' is our own arithmetic (5% fee x creator payouts), already flagged inline on the card as inferred, and must not sit in the headline. Forbes (and Tech.eu, also opened) both print the acquisition as $29 million; the card's 'GBP22M' is the same deal in another currency, and the TechBlast founder Q&A that reportedly carried GBP22M now 301-redirects to a live page where the original article is gone, so GBP22M is currently unsourceable from any page we could open. Creators have earned over $500 million since 2011 (with $10.5 million paid out in December 2021 alone) - that is creator GMV, not Tebex revenue, and must be labeled as such. Tebex's own accounts are not public; the company is now inside Overwolf.

tebexrevenue.value

wasabout $5-7M

now$29M

'about $5-7M/yr' is our own arithmetic (5% fee x creator payouts), already flagged inline on the card as inferred, and must not sit in the headline. Forbes (and Tech.eu, also opened) both print the acquisition as $29 million; the card's 'GBP22M' is the same deal in another currency, and the TechBlast founder Q&A that reportedly carried GBP22M now 301-redirects to a live page where the original article is gone, so GBP22M is currently unsourceable from any page we could open. Creators have earned over $500 million since 2011 (with $10.5 million paid out in December 2021 alone) - that is creator GMV, not Tebex revenue, and must be labeled as such. Tebex's own accounts are not public; the company is now inside Overwolf.

taxjarrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'about $20M ARR' is on no page. The Mark MacLeod podcast cited as its origin contains no ARR at all, its only revenue line is Faggiano saying 'I think we were doing a thousand bucks per month' in the earliest days. Stripe's newsroom post discloses neither revenue nor price. TaxJar's own announcement post states more than 23,000 businesses used TaxJar at the April 2021 Stripe acquisition. The $850-900M exit metric is solid and confirmed on Axios (opened in browser, 403 to WebFetch): 'Stripe paid $850 million to $900 million to snap up TaxJar, Axios has learned' - badge EST, Stripe never disclosed terms.

taxjarrevenue.label

wasARR before Stripe (est)

nowbusinesses at acquisition

'about $20M ARR' is on no page. The Mark MacLeod podcast cited as its origin contains no ARR at all, its only revenue line is Faggiano saying 'I think we were doing a thousand bucks per month' in the earliest days. Stripe's newsroom post discloses neither revenue nor price. TaxJar's own announcement post states more than 23,000 businesses used TaxJar at the April 2021 Stripe acquisition. The $850-900M exit metric is solid and confirmed on Axios (opened in browser, 403 to WebFetch): 'Stripe paid $850 million to $900 million to snap up TaxJar, Axios has learned' - badge EST, Stripe never disclosed terms.

taxjarrevenue.value

wasabout $20M

now23,000+

'about $20M ARR' is on no page. The Mark MacLeod podcast cited as its origin contains no ARR at all, its only revenue line is Faggiano saying 'I think we were doing a thousand bucks per month' in the earliest days. Stripe's newsroom post discloses neither revenue nor price. TaxJar's own announcement post states more than 23,000 businesses used TaxJar at the April 2021 Stripe acquisition. The $850-900M exit metric is solid and confirmed on Axios (opened in browser, 403 to WebFetch): 'Stripe paid $850 million to $900 million to snap up TaxJar, Axios has learned' - badge EST, Stripe never disclosed terms.

erecht24revenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'$9M+/yr' is our own floor calculation (47,000 customers x about EUR180/yr) - a multiplication, not a source, and the 47,000 paying-customer figure could not be found on any opened page. eRecht24's own homepage states more than 370,000 websites have already been successfully legally secured with eRecht24 Premium - use that instead. North Data shows the operating KG's filed financials are paywalled ('Earnings numbers are only available to our premium service subscribers') behind a EUR49/month subscription, not accessed, not guessed at. 370,000 is cumulative websites secured, not current paying members.

erecht24revenue.label

wasest floor, P&L private

nowwebsites secured (Premium)

'$9M+/yr' is our own floor calculation (47,000 customers x about EUR180/yr) - a multiplication, not a source, and the 47,000 paying-customer figure could not be found on any opened page. eRecht24's own homepage states more than 370,000 websites have already been successfully legally secured with eRecht24 Premium - use that instead. North Data shows the operating KG's filed financials are paywalled ('Earnings numbers are only available to our premium service subscribers') behind a EUR49/month subscription, not accessed, not guessed at. 370,000 is cumulative websites secured, not current paying members.

erecht24revenue.value

was$9M+/yr

now370,000+

'$9M+/yr' is our own floor calculation (47,000 customers x about EUR180/yr) - a multiplication, not a source, and the 47,000 paying-customer figure could not be found on any opened page. eRecht24's own homepage states more than 370,000 websites have already been successfully legally secured with eRecht24 Premium - use that instead. North Data shows the operating KG's filed financials are paywalled ('Earnings numbers are only available to our premium service subscribers') behind a EUR49/month subscription, not accessed, not guessed at. 370,000 is cumulative websites secured, not current paying members.

booqablerevenue.label

wasest., private company

nowest. ARR (Latka, 2025)

the card's 'about $3M/yr' was our blend of Latka's $2.8M and Owler's alleged $3.2M; Owler timed out twice at 60s and nothing can be asserted from it, so that $3.2M half must come off regardless of which headline is used. Booqable itself discloses no revenue: booqable.com/about prints 37 team members, 16 countries, launched 2014, and 'thousands of rental businesses,' no financials, and $0 raised. If we prefer to stop laundering tracker estimates, the honest first-party alternative is 'Bootstrapped, $0 raised - 37 staff in 16 countries.'

booqablerevenue.value

wasabout $3M/yr

now$2.8M

the card's 'about $3M/yr' was our blend of Latka's $2.8M and Owler's alleged $3.2M; Owler timed out twice at 60s and nothing can be asserted from it, so that $3.2M half must come off regardless of which headline is used. Booqable itself discloses no revenue: booqable.com/about prints 37 team members, 16 countries, launched 2014, and 'thousands of rental businesses,' no financials, and $0 raised. If we prefer to stop laundering tracker estimates, the honest first-party alternative is 'Bootstrapped, $0 raised - 37 staff in 16 countries.'

unicornplatformrevenue.label

wasARR at sale, 2022

nowMRR at sale (2022)

'$192K ARR' is our own multiplication ($16K x 12); no page prints an ARR for Unicorn Platform at all. TheyGotAcquired's founder-sourced report gives MRR $16,000, 1,000 paid users, 25,000 total users, and a sale for $400,000 cash + $400,000 equity = $800,000 (2022). The founder's own essay (https://www.isora.me/i-sold-saas-for-800k/) confirms the $800K and its cash/equity split, '$400K in Mars stocks. $400K in cash,' but no MRR. The card's '4.2x ARR' multiple is also ours and should come off.

unicornplatformrevenue.value

was$192K

now$16K/mo

'$192K ARR' is our own multiplication ($16K x 12); no page prints an ARR for Unicorn Platform at all. TheyGotAcquired's founder-sourced report gives MRR $16,000, 1,000 paid users, 25,000 total users, and a sale for $400,000 cash + $400,000 equity = $800,000 (2022). The founder's own essay (https://www.isora.me/i-sold-saas-for-800k/) confirms the $800K and its cash/equity split, '$400K in Mars stocks. $400K in cash,' but no MRR. The card's '4.2x ARR' multiple is also ours and should come off.

uncatrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'$1-3M ARR' is explicitly our own arithmetic ($9/client x 'stated scale') and appears on no page - the card's honesty note already says so, but the headline still printed it as if it were a finding. Uncat's own homepage states 25k+ accountants, bookkeepers, clients, and their cats, and $9/month per client; only the user count and price are first-party. The 25k+ figure counts clients too, not only paying accountants, so it must not be re-multiplied into a revenue estimate.

uncatrevenue.label

wasest · undisclosed

nowaccountants & bookkeepers

'$1-3M ARR' is explicitly our own arithmetic ($9/client x 'stated scale') and appears on no page - the card's honesty note already says so, but the headline still printed it as if it were a finding. Uncat's own homepage states 25k+ accountants, bookkeepers, clients, and their cats, and $9/month per client; only the user count and price are first-party. The 25k+ figure counts clients too, not only paying accountants, so it must not be re-multiplied into a revenue estimate.

uncatrevenue.value

wasabout $1-3M ARR

now25k+

'$1-3M ARR' is explicitly our own arithmetic ($9/client x 'stated scale') and appears on no page - the card's honesty note already says so, but the headline still printed it as if it were a finding. Uncat's own homepage states 25k+ accountants, bookkeepers, clients, and their cats, and $9/month per client; only the user count and price are first-party. The 25k+ figure counts clients too, not only paying accountants, so it must not be re-multiplied into a revenue estimate.

taskmagicrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'mid-7-figure exit' is on no page we could open - the Acquire.com blog post that reportedly carried it is a hard 404 (confirmed twice), and the Apple Podcasts page carries only the episode title 'Seven-Figure Exit' with no figures in the description, so the word 'mid' is ours and must go, and the exit price stays undisclosed. Founder's own X bio says 'Inc 500 ceo of taskmagic ($4 mill rev) (exited).' Corroboration: Starter Story prints $2M/year and $167K monthly revenue with over 6,000 paying customers (older); NoCode Exits prints almost $4 million revenue with over 7,000 paying customers. Lead with the founder's own $4M.

taskmagicrevenue.label

wassold on Acquire.com

nowtotal revenue, exited

'mid-7-figure exit' is on no page we could open - the Acquire.com blog post that reportedly carried it is a hard 404 (confirmed twice), and the Apple Podcasts page carries only the episode title 'Seven-Figure Exit' with no figures in the description, so the word 'mid' is ours and must go, and the exit price stays undisclosed. Founder's own X bio says 'Inc 500 ceo of taskmagic ($4 mill rev) (exited).' Corroboration: Starter Story prints $2M/year and $167K monthly revenue with over 6,000 paying customers (older); NoCode Exits prints almost $4 million revenue with over 7,000 paying customers. Lead with the founder's own $4M.

taskmagicrevenue.value

wasMid-7-figure exit

now$4M

'mid-7-figure exit' is on no page we could open - the Acquire.com blog post that reportedly carried it is a hard 404 (confirmed twice), and the Apple Podcasts page carries only the episode title 'Seven-Figure Exit' with no figures in the description, so the word 'mid' is ours and must go, and the exit price stays undisclosed. Founder's own X bio says 'Inc 500 ceo of taskmagic ($4 mill rev) (exited).' Corroboration: Starter Story prints $2M/year and $167K monthly revenue with over 6,000 paying customers (older); NoCode Exits prints almost $4 million revenue with over 7,000 paying customers. Lead with the founder's own $4M.

fastboundrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card's '$2-5M/yr est.' is our own inference from '10,000 FFLs x $9/mo pricing,' on no page, and the card's own honesty note already admits this. The homepage carries only 'Since 2010' and 'From $9/month'; the features page states over 10,000 FFLs have trusted FastBound, buyers completed nearly 1.5 million 4473s in 2024 alone (roughly 10% of the NSSF's adjusted NICS total), and FastBound has processed more than a billion transactions since 2010 - that is where the sourcing should point.

fastboundrevenue.label

wasest. ARR, undisclosed

nowFFLs since 2010

the card's '$2-5M/yr est.' is our own inference from '10,000 FFLs x $9/mo pricing,' on no page, and the card's own honesty note already admits this. The homepage carries only 'Since 2010' and 'From $9/month'; the features page states over 10,000 FFLs have trusted FastBound, buyers completed nearly 1.5 million 4473s in 2024 alone (roughly 10% of the NSSF's adjusted NICS total), and FastBound has processed more than a billion transactions since 2010 - that is where the sourcing should point.

fastboundrevenue.value

was$2-5M/yr

now10,000+

the card's '$2-5M/yr est.' is our own inference from '10,000 FFLs x $9/mo pricing,' on no page, and the card's own honesty note already admits this. The homepage carries only 'Since 2010' and 'From $9/month'; the features page states over 10,000 FFLs have trusted FastBound, buyers completed nearly 1.5 million 4473s in 2024 alone (roughly 10% of the NSSF's adjusted NICS total), and FastBound has processed more than a billion transactions since 2010 - that is where the sourcing should point.

junglebeerevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries 'about $240K/yr' - that is us taking TrustMRR's number and multiplying by the 4% fee, our own arithmetic. What TrustMRR labels 'revenue' ($19,567,081 all-time, $513,721 last 30 days, verified via the founder's connected Stripe key) is gross charges through Stripe, and on a 4% booking-fee model (junglebee.com: 'Only a 4% booking fee per credit card transaction,' no monthly fee, over 4,800 members) those charges are traveller bookings, not Junglebee's take. Junglebee's own net revenue is undisclosed; a non-GMV alternative headline is '4,800+ operators' (first-party).

junglebeerevenue.label

was4% take, est. (not GMV)

nowgross bookings via Stripe

no page carries 'about $240K/yr' - that is us taking TrustMRR's number and multiplying by the 4% fee, our own arithmetic. What TrustMRR labels 'revenue' ($19,567,081 all-time, $513,721 last 30 days, verified via the founder's connected Stripe key) is gross charges through Stripe, and on a 4% booking-fee model (junglebee.com: 'Only a 4% booking fee per credit card transaction,' no monthly fee, over 4,800 members) those charges are traveller bookings, not Junglebee's take. Junglebee's own net revenue is undisclosed; a non-GMV alternative headline is '4,800+ operators' (first-party).

junglebeerevenue.value

wasabout $240K/yr

now$19.6M

no page carries 'about $240K/yr' - that is us taking TrustMRR's number and multiplying by the 4% fee, our own arithmetic. What TrustMRR labels 'revenue' ($19,567,081 all-time, $513,721 last 30 days, verified via the founder's connected Stripe key) is gross charges through Stripe, and on a 4% booking-fee model (junglebee.com: 'Only a 4% booking fee per credit card transaction,' no monthly fee, over 4,800 members) those charges are traveller bookings, not Junglebee's take. Junglebee's own net revenue is undisclosed; a non-GMV alternative headline is '4,800+ operators' (first-party).

bandcamprevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

our $21M/yr was ECDB's MONTHLY store-sales estimate printed as annual company revenue: the ECDB page itself states 'Bandcamp's annual sales amounted to US$255m in 2025' separately from 'revenues in June of 2026 were US$21m' - and even that $21m/$255m is ECDB's estimate of store sales (what fans paid), not Bandcamp's 10-15% cut. Bandcamp's own revenue has never been disclosed; MBW quotes Bandcamp's live counter that fans have paid artists and their labels $1.3bn via the platform to date, with Bandcamp's cut at 15% digital / 10% physical and an average of 82% going to the artist or label.

bandcamprevenue.label

wasest. net (10-15% cut)

nowpaid to artists to date

our $21M/yr was ECDB's MONTHLY store-sales estimate printed as annual company revenue: the ECDB page itself states 'Bandcamp's annual sales amounted to US$255m in 2025' separately from 'revenues in June of 2026 were US$21m' - and even that $21m/$255m is ECDB's estimate of store sales (what fans paid), not Bandcamp's 10-15% cut. Bandcamp's own revenue has never been disclosed; MBW quotes Bandcamp's live counter that fans have paid artists and their labels $1.3bn via the platform to date, with Bandcamp's cut at 15% digital / 10% physical and an average of 82% going to the artist or label.

bandcamprevenue.value

wasabout $21M/yr

now$1.3B+

our $21M/yr was ECDB's MONTHLY store-sales estimate printed as annual company revenue: the ECDB page itself states 'Bandcamp's annual sales amounted to US$255m in 2025' separately from 'revenues in June of 2026 were US$21m' - and even that $21m/$255m is ECDB's estimate of store sales (what fans paid), not Bandcamp's 10-15% cut. Bandcamp's own revenue has never been disclosed; MBW quotes Bandcamp's live counter that fans have paid artists and their labels $1.3bn via the platform to date, with Bandcamp's cut at 15% digital / 10% physical and an average of 82% going to the artist or label.

fincenfetchrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the card actually cites /about/ for '1,000+ firms,' but /about/ says 'more than 700 firms' - the 1,000+ claim (trusted by 1000+ firms) lives on the homepage only, so the citation must move there. Neither page, nor any other found, carries a revenue figure; the card's '$2M-5M' is a bottom-up guess and should not be printed. Revenue is genuinely undisclosed, and the March 2025 CTA exemption makes any run-rate guess especially unsafe.

fincenfetchrevenue.label

wasest. ARR · undisclosed

nowfirms

the card actually cites /about/ for '1,000+ firms,' but /about/ says 'more than 700 firms' - the 1,000+ claim (trusted by 1000+ firms) lives on the homepage only, so the citation must move there. Neither page, nor any other found, carries a revenue figure; the card's '$2M-5M' is a bottom-up guess and should not be printed. Revenue is genuinely undisclosed, and the March 2025 CTA exemption makes any run-rate guess especially unsafe.

fincenfetchrevenue.value

wasabout $2M-5M

now1,000+

the card actually cites /about/ for '1,000+ firms,' but /about/ says 'more than 700 firms' - the 1,000+ claim (trusted by 1000+ firms) lives on the homepage only, so the citation must move there. Neither page, nor any other found, carries a revenue figure; the card's '$2M-5M' is a bottom-up guess and should not be printed. Revenue is genuinely undisclosed, and the March 2025 CTA exemption makes any run-rate guess especially unsafe.

financialcentsrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

Financial Cents' own about page carries the user count (over 10,000 accountants, bookkeepers, and CPAs) and a 171% year-over-year growth rate, but no ARR and no funding figure. The card's 'about $8M' is a revenue-per-employee heuristic applied to headcount - our arithmetic, on no page. The card's '$0 raised' is sourced to Latka, not to the about page.

financialcentsrevenue.label

wasARR est. (10K+ users)

nowaccountants and CPAs

Financial Cents' own about page carries the user count (over 10,000 accountants, bookkeepers, and CPAs) and a 171% year-over-year growth rate, but no ARR and no funding figure. The card's 'about $8M' is a revenue-per-employee heuristic applied to headcount - our arithmetic, on no page. The card's '$0 raised' is sourced to Latka, not to the about page.

financialcentsrevenue.value

wasabout $8M

now10,000+

Financial Cents' own about page carries the user count (over 10,000 accountants, bookkeepers, and CPAs) and a 171% year-over-year growth rate, but no ARR and no funding figure. The card's 'about $8M' is a revenue-per-employee heuristic applied to headcount - our arithmetic, on no page. The card's '$0 raised' is sourced to Latka, not to the about page.

cleancloudrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

CleanCloud's own homepage says trusted by 5,000+ of the best laundromats and dry cleaners. Its 10th-year milestone blog post confirms over $1 billion processed in transactions and more than 10 million customers reached, and states no revenue. Nothing anywhere carries 'about $5M ARR' - that is 5,000 merchants times a price band, our arithmetic. If a dollar headline is wanted, the only provable one is $1B+ processed, and it must be labeled as payment volume (GMV), never as revenue.

cleancloudrevenue.label

was5,000+ merchants · est.

nowlaundromats & dry cleaners

CleanCloud's own homepage says trusted by 5,000+ of the best laundromats and dry cleaners. Its 10th-year milestone blog post confirms over $1 billion processed in transactions and more than 10 million customers reached, and states no revenue. Nothing anywhere carries 'about $5M ARR' - that is 5,000 merchants times a price band, our arithmetic. If a dollar headline is wanted, the only provable one is $1B+ processed, and it must be labeled as payment volume (GMV), never as revenue.

cleancloudrevenue.value

wasabout $5M ARR

now5,000+

CleanCloud's own homepage says trusted by 5,000+ of the best laundromats and dry cleaners. Its 10th-year milestone blog post confirms over $1 billion processed in transactions and more than 10 million customers reached, and states no revenue. Nothing anywhere carries 'about $5M ARR' - that is 5,000 merchants times a price band, our arithmetic. If a dollar headline is wanted, the only provable one is $1B+ processed, and it must be labeled as payment volume (GMV), never as revenue.

codeablerevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

Codeable's own story page prints no dollar figure at all, only 300K+ projects completed, 750+ WordPress experts, 25K+ customers, and a core team of 20. A Cloudways interview does carry a founder-stated dollar figure - 'our developers complete more than $250,000 (and growing) worth of projects every month' - but it is GMV, not revenue, and plainly stale (the same interview cites about 12,000 clients and 150+ developers versus 25K+ and 750+ today), so it cannot be headlined as current. The card's '$825K/yr' is that stale GMV times a take rate we assembled ourselves - pure arithmetic on a stale input, on no page.

codeablerevenue.label

wasest. take on GMV

nowprojects shipped

Codeable's own story page prints no dollar figure at all, only 300K+ projects completed, 750+ WordPress experts, 25K+ customers, and a core team of 20. A Cloudways interview does carry a founder-stated dollar figure - 'our developers complete more than $250,000 (and growing) worth of projects every month' - but it is GMV, not revenue, and plainly stale (the same interview cites about 12,000 clients and 150+ developers versus 25K+ and 750+ today), so it cannot be headlined as current. The card's '$825K/yr' is that stale GMV times a take rate we assembled ourselves - pure arithmetic on a stale input, on no page.

codeablerevenue.value

wasabout $825K/yr

now300K+

Codeable's own story page prints no dollar figure at all, only 300K+ projects completed, 750+ WordPress experts, 25K+ customers, and a core team of 20. A Cloudways interview does carry a founder-stated dollar figure - 'our developers complete more than $250,000 (and growing) worth of projects every month' - but it is GMV, not revenue, and plainly stale (the same interview cites about 12,000 clients and 150+ developers versus 25K+ and 750+ today), so it cannot be headlined as current. The card's '$825K/yr' is that stale GMV times a take rate we assembled ourselves - pure arithmetic on a stale input, on no page.

bandzooglerevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the Bandzoogle/DistroKid acquisition announcement as reported by MBW carries the site count (over 60,000 sites), pricing bands ($8.29/mo Lite to $16.63/mo Pro), and cumulative artist sales (over $100 million) - but explicitly no Bandzoogle revenue; DistroKid never disclosed deal terms and Bandzoogle never published ARR. The card's 'about $8M/yr' is 60,000 x the price band, our own multiplication, not a source. bandzoogle.com itself 403s to a bot, so the site count is taken from MBW. The $100M+ figure is cumulative artist GMV, not company revenue.

bandzooglerevenue.label

wasEst. subscription revenue

nowartist sites and stores

the Bandzoogle/DistroKid acquisition announcement as reported by MBW carries the site count (over 60,000 sites), pricing bands ($8.29/mo Lite to $16.63/mo Pro), and cumulative artist sales (over $100 million) - but explicitly no Bandzoogle revenue; DistroKid never disclosed deal terms and Bandzoogle never published ARR. The card's 'about $8M/yr' is 60,000 x the price band, our own multiplication, not a source. bandzoogle.com itself 403s to a bot, so the site count is taken from MBW. The $100M+ figure is cumulative artist GMV, not company revenue.

bandzooglerevenue.value

wasabout $8M/yr

now60,000+

the Bandzoogle/DistroKid acquisition announcement as reported by MBW carries the site count (over 60,000 sites), pricing bands ($8.29/mo Lite to $16.63/mo Pro), and cumulative artist sales (over $100 million) - but explicitly no Bandzoogle revenue; DistroKid never disclosed deal terms and Bandzoogle never published ARR. The card's 'about $8M/yr' is 60,000 x the price band, our own multiplication, not a source. bandzoogle.com itself 403s to a bot, so the site count is taken from MBW. The $100M+ figure is cumulative artist GMV, not company revenue.

clinikorevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

Cliniko's own story page (April 2025 on its timeline) states over 65,000 health professionals use Cliniko. Nothing carries 'AU$22M' - that is our own back-calculation from a giving pledge, not a source. Two side corrections: the charity page says Cliniko has given just shy of AU$2.7 million to charity as of March 2025, not the card's 'AU$3M+'; and the '95 countries' metric appears on none of the opened pages, the story page only says 55 countries, from 2012.

clinikorevenue.label

wasest. from 2% giving pledge

nowpractitioners

Cliniko's own story page (April 2025 on its timeline) states over 65,000 health professionals use Cliniko. Nothing carries 'AU$22M' - that is our own back-calculation from a giving pledge, not a source. Two side corrections: the charity page says Cliniko has given just shy of AU$2.7 million to charity as of March 2025, not the card's 'AU$3M+'; and the '95 countries' metric appears on none of the opened pages, the story page only says 55 countries, from 2012.

clinikorevenue.value

wasabout AU$22M/yr ($14M)

now65,000+

Cliniko's own story page (April 2025 on its timeline) states over 65,000 health professionals use Cliniko. Nothing carries 'AU$22M' - that is our own back-calculation from a giving pledge, not a source. Two side corrections: the charity page says Cliniko has given just shy of AU$2.7 million to charity as of March 2025, not the card's 'AU$3M+'; and the '95 countries' metric appears on none of the opened pages, the story page only says 55 countries, from 2012.

swimplyrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page anywhere carries 'about $8-10M net revenue' - it is ours. Per NPR (Jul 3, 2026), a Swimply spokesperson states listings in 150 cities and more than 275,000 reservations so far in 2026, about 50% more than last year. Third-party revenue guesses are wildly inconsistent (Kona Equity $4.2M, Growjo about $27.9M, content-farm blogs $10M-$31M) and none should be printed; Swimply has never disclosed revenue. The '4M+ experiences' and '30% take' metrics are not on the NPR page - the take rate is from Wikipedia, and TechCrunch (2021) reported a different 15% host split.

swimplyrevenue.label

wasest. annual net rev

nowreservations in 2026

no page anywhere carries 'about $8-10M net revenue' - it is ours. Per NPR (Jul 3, 2026), a Swimply spokesperson states listings in 150 cities and more than 275,000 reservations so far in 2026, about 50% more than last year. Third-party revenue guesses are wildly inconsistent (Kona Equity $4.2M, Growjo about $27.9M, content-farm blogs $10M-$31M) and none should be printed; Swimply has never disclosed revenue. The '4M+ experiences' and '30% take' metrics are not on the NPR page - the take rate is from Wikipedia, and TechCrunch (2021) reported a different 15% host split.

swimplyrevenue.value

wasabout $8-10M

now275,000+

no page anywhere carries 'about $8-10M net revenue' - it is ours. Per NPR (Jul 3, 2026), a Swimply spokesperson states listings in 150 cities and more than 275,000 reservations so far in 2026, about 50% more than last year. Third-party revenue guesses are wildly inconsistent (Kona Equity $4.2M, Growjo about $27.9M, content-farm blogs $10M-$31M) and none should be printed; Swimply has never disclosed revenue. The '4M+ experiences' and '30% take' metrics are not on the NPR page - the take rate is from Wikipedia, and TechCrunch (2021) reported a different 15% host split.

gumroadrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowFILED

the filing (a scanned PDF with zero extractable text, rasterized and read) prints Total Income $20,738,506.09 and Net Income $8,911,462.37 for Jan-Dec 2023 - matching the card's $20.7M/$8.9M exactly, from a federal Reg CF annual report (Form C-AR, filed 2024-05-15) rather than a tweet, so the card can be upgraded from STATED to FILED. The cited tweet is also real (x.com 402s to bots, but reads in a browser): 'Gumroad did $20.7M in revenue in 2023, $8.9M in net profit, with zero (0) full-time employees.' Cite the SEC filing first, the tweet second; the 2024 '$23.8M' Latka number stays out.

dealcheckrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'$1-2M/yr' is not a source's number at all - the card's own honesty note admits it is our derivation (350K users x $120-240/yr x an assumed conversion rate), exactly the forbidden arithmetic-printed-as-figure. DealCheck's About page states over three hundred fifty thousand real estate investors, agents, brokers and wholesalers, founded 2015, and carries no revenue whatsoever. Keep $0 outside funding (Tracxn) as a supporting metric.

dealcheckrevenue.label

wasundisclosed · derived

nowusers

'$1-2M/yr' is not a source's number at all - the card's own honesty note admits it is our derivation (350K users x $120-240/yr x an assumed conversion rate), exactly the forbidden arithmetic-printed-as-figure. DealCheck's About page states over three hundred fifty thousand real estate investors, agents, brokers and wholesalers, founded 2015, and carries no revenue whatsoever. Keep $0 outside funding (Tracxn) as a supporting metric.

dealcheckrevenue.value

wasabout $1-2M/yr

now350,000+

'$1-2M/yr' is not a source's number at all - the card's own honesty note admits it is our derivation (350K users x $120-240/yr x an assumed conversion rate), exactly the forbidden arithmetic-printed-as-figure. DealCheck's About page states over three hundred fifty thousand real estate investors, agents, brokers and wholesalers, founded 2015, and carries no revenue whatsoever. Keep $0 outside funding (Tracxn) as a supporting metric.

submithubrevenue.value

wasabout $50K/mo

now$55K/mo

'about $50K/mo' is on no page - it looks like our own split-the-difference between a podcast's about $46K and Indie Hackers' $55K, and our arithmetic is not a source. The Indie Hackers revenue page prints $55K/mo self-reported by the founder with no date attached, so it must be labeled undated rather than implying a year. Growjo's about $5M/yr remains an unverified third-party guess and must not be the headline.

predictwindrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

ZoomInfo could not be read - 403 to WebFetch and 403 (Cloudflare) in a real browser - so 'about $12.3M' cannot be asserted from it. Founder Jon Bilger states in a published interview (Dec 11, 2023): 'We currently have over a million users on PredictWind.' The About page has no revenue and no user count, only '20,000 sites around the world' and '30 years of experience.' The card's stale '300k+ users (reported)' is beaten by the founder's own more recent statement; per our rule, a first-party statement outranks a third-party guess.

predictwindrevenue.label

was3rd-party est, unconfirmed

nowusers

ZoomInfo could not be read - 403 to WebFetch and 403 (Cloudflare) in a real browser - so 'about $12.3M' cannot be asserted from it. Founder Jon Bilger states in a published interview (Dec 11, 2023): 'We currently have over a million users on PredictWind.' The About page has no revenue and no user count, only '20,000 sites around the world' and '30 years of experience.' The card's stale '300k+ users (reported)' is beaten by the founder's own more recent statement; per our rule, a first-party statement outranks a third-party guess.

predictwindrevenue.value

wasabout $12M/yr

now1M+

ZoomInfo could not be read - 403 to WebFetch and 403 (Cloudflare) in a real browser - so 'about $12.3M' cannot be asserted from it. Founder Jon Bilger states in a published interview (Dec 11, 2023): 'We currently have over a million users on PredictWind.' The About page has no revenue and no user count, only '20,000 sites around the world' and '30 years of experience.' The card's stale '300k+ users (reported)' is beaten by the founder's own more recent statement; per our rule, a first-party statement outranks a third-party guess.

craftybaserevenue.label

wasprofitable · rev private

nowproduct businesses

the cited craftybase.com/about-us/ is dead (302s to app.stocksmith.io/about-us/, which returns HTTP 500); Craftybase has rebranded to Stocksmith, same team and software. No revenue figure exists anywhere, which is fine, but the card's '14 yrs' is on no page either - the company states 'since 2013' (13 years as of 2026), our own arithmetic is not a source, so headline the customer count and let the About page's own 'since 2013' carry the age claim.

craftybaserevenue.value

was14 yrs

now10,000+

the cited craftybase.com/about-us/ is dead (302s to app.stocksmith.io/about-us/, which returns HTTP 500); Craftybase has rebranded to Stocksmith, same team and software. No revenue figure exists anywhere, which is fine, but the card's '14 yrs' is on no page either - the company states 'since 2013' (13 years as of 2026), our own arithmetic is not a source, so headline the customer count and let the About page's own 'since 2013' carry the age claim.

nomadlistrevenue.label

was$0 VC · solo

nowfounder-stated MRR

the card's 'about $38K/mo (2025)' is stale by roughly 3.5x and is on no page today. The founder's public bio (read in-browser, x.com 402s to WebFetch) lists 'Nomads.com $11K/m.' Nomad List is now nomads.com; the old open-startup pages (nomadlist.com/open and nomads.com/open) both return only a maintenance stub. The live site prints 42,521 members as a secondary metric. A bio is a mutable page, so this figure is date-stamped 2026-07-13 and needs re-verification via browser at any later check.

nomadlistrevenue.value

wasabout $38K/mo

now$11K/mo

the card's 'about $38K/mo (2025)' is stale by roughly 3.5x and is on no page today. The founder's public bio (read in-browser, x.com 402s to WebFetch) lists 'Nomads.com $11K/m.' Nomad List is now nomads.com; the old open-startup pages (nomadlist.com/open and nomads.com/open) both return only a maintenance stub. The live site prints 42,521 members as a secondary metric. A bio is a mutable page, so this figure is date-stamped 2026-07-13 and needs re-verification via browser at any later check.

iubendarevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

'about $24M ARR' appears on no page - it is an unnamed aggregator's guess and should not survive. The team.blue acquisition press release (Feb 14, 2022) confirms only the acquisition-era facts, 'about 80,000 customers today, spread over 100+ countries,' a team of nearly 100, and discloses no revenue or deal terms. iubenda's own About page states 150,000 clients worldwide, 100+ countries, 2.5+ million self-updating documents, and 7+ billion pages/month running its cookie banner - use the current 150,000 as the headline and keep 80,000-at-exit as a secondary metric.

iubendarevenue.label

wasest. ARR - undisclosed

nowclients worldwide

'about $24M ARR' appears on no page - it is an unnamed aggregator's guess and should not survive. The team.blue acquisition press release (Feb 14, 2022) confirms only the acquisition-era facts, 'about 80,000 customers today, spread over 100+ countries,' a team of nearly 100, and discloses no revenue or deal terms. iubenda's own About page states 150,000 clients worldwide, 100+ countries, 2.5+ million self-updating documents, and 7+ billion pages/month running its cookie banner - use the current 150,000 as the headline and keep 80,000-at-exit as a secondary metric.

iubendarevenue.value

wasabout $24M

now150,000

'about $24M ARR' appears on no page - it is an unnamed aggregator's guess and should not survive. The team.blue acquisition press release (Feb 14, 2022) confirms only the acquisition-era facts, 'about 80,000 customers today, spread over 100+ countries,' a team of nearly 100, and discloses no revenue or deal terms. iubenda's own About page states 150,000 clients worldwide, 100+ countries, 2.5+ million self-updating documents, and 7+ billion pages/month running its cookie banner - use the current 150,000 as the headline and keep 80,000-at-exit as a secondary metric.

planningcenterrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

the Owler estimate on the card is wrong: Owler itself (opened in a browser after WebFetch timeouts) prints 'Est. Annual Revenue $100K-5.0M' and 'Est. Employees 25-100' - nowhere near the card's '$19M,' and self-evidently junk for a 200-person company; drop the EST entirely, nobody publishes $19M. The About page states over 90,000 churches trust Planning Center (the same page also self-contradicts with '80,000+'), 4 million active users, 200+ employees, and $29+ billion processed donations - the latter is donations processed, not revenue, and must never be headlined as such.

planningcenterrevenue.label

wasEST; private, bootstrapped

nowchurches

the Owler estimate on the card is wrong: Owler itself (opened in a browser after WebFetch timeouts) prints 'Est. Annual Revenue $100K-5.0M' and 'Est. Employees 25-100' - nowhere near the card's '$19M,' and self-evidently junk for a 200-person company; drop the EST entirely, nobody publishes $19M. The About page states over 90,000 churches trust Planning Center (the same page also self-contradicts with '80,000+'), 4 million active users, 200+ employees, and $29+ billion processed donations - the latter is donations processed, not revenue, and must never be headlined as such.

planningcenterrevenue.value

wasabout $19M/yr

now90,000+

the Owler estimate on the card is wrong: Owler itself (opened in a browser after WebFetch timeouts) prints 'Est. Annual Revenue $100K-5.0M' and 'Est. Employees 25-100' - nowhere near the card's '$19M,' and self-evidently junk for a 200-person company; drop the EST entirely, nobody publishes $19M. The About page states over 90,000 churches trust Planning Center (the same page also self-contradicts with '80,000+'), 4 million active users, 200+ employees, and $29+ billion processed donations - the latter is donations processed, not revenue, and must never be headlined as such.

roll20revenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page carries '$4-16M/yr.' Roll20's own blog (July 13, 2022, announcing the OneBookShelf merger) says over 10 million users who play TTRPGs; a Feb 2022 CEO-announcement forum post corroborates 'we have grown to 10 million users.' Wikipedia's infobox prints no revenue, only 8,000,000+ users as of March 2021; the Orr Report Q4 2020 says 8 million users, no revenue. Revenue is genuinely never disclosed, and 10M is registered accounts, not payers.

roll20revenue.label

wasEst only — never disclosed

nowregistered users

no page carries '$4-16M/yr.' Roll20's own blog (July 13, 2022, announcing the OneBookShelf merger) says over 10 million users who play TTRPGs; a Feb 2022 CEO-announcement forum post corroborates 'we have grown to 10 million users.' Wikipedia's infobox prints no revenue, only 8,000,000+ users as of March 2021; the Orr Report Q4 2020 says 8 million users, no revenue. Revenue is genuinely never disclosed, and 10M is registered accounts, not payers.

roll20revenue.value

was$4-16M/yr

now10M+

no page carries '$4-16M/yr.' Roll20's own blog (July 13, 2022, announcing the OneBookShelf merger) says over 10 million users who play TTRPGs; a Feb 2022 CEO-announcement forum post corroborates 'we have grown to 10 million users.' Wikipedia's infobox prints no revenue, only 8,000,000+ users as of March 2021; the Orr Report Q4 2020 says 8 million users, no revenue. Revenue is genuinely never disclosed, and 10M is registered accounts, not payers.

brewwrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

card's 'about $1M ARR' is our own arithmetic (750 breweries x a monthly price) and appears on no page; the method is also wrong, since Breww's pricing page charges by annual beer output in hectolitres and explicitly does not charge per user. The self-reported count is stale too: the site now says over 800 breweries, not 750+. Card's '$38/mo' is our conversion of Capterra's GBP29.99 list price, not a figure any page prints.

brewwrevenue.label

wasest · 750+ breweries

nowbreweries

card's 'about $1M ARR' is our own arithmetic (750 breweries x a monthly price) and appears on no page; the method is also wrong, since Breww's pricing page charges by annual beer output in hectolitres and explicitly does not charge per user. The self-reported count is stale too: the site now says over 800 breweries, not 750+. Card's '$38/mo' is our conversion of Capterra's GBP29.99 list price, not a figure any page prints.

brewwrevenue.value

wasAbout $1M ARR

now800+

card's 'about $1M ARR' is our own arithmetic (750 breweries x a monthly price) and appears on no page; the method is also wrong, since Breww's pricing page charges by annual beer output in hectolitres and explicitly does not charge per user. The self-reported count is stale too: the site now says over 800 breweries, not 750+. Card's '$38/mo' is our conversion of Capterra's GBP29.99 list price, not a figure any page prints.

opendentalrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

card's '$30-50M/yr' is our own model (practices x published fee), and its input is itself unverifiable: the 'about 20,000 practices' figure could not be found on the homepage, the fees page, the company blog, or Wikipedia. Growjo prints '$18.6M per year' at 128 employees, but the company's own blog says 300+ employees, so that estimate is built on a headcount the company contradicts and is not a usable replacement. Fees page states $199/month/location for the first 12 months, then $149/month/location.

opendentalrevenue.label

wasmodeled, not disclosed

nowemployees

card's '$30-50M/yr' is our own model (practices x published fee), and its input is itself unverifiable: the 'about 20,000 practices' figure could not be found on the homepage, the fees page, the company blog, or Wikipedia. Growjo prints '$18.6M per year' at 128 employees, but the company's own blog says 300+ employees, so that estimate is built on a headcount the company contradicts and is not a usable replacement. Fees page states $199/month/location for the first 12 months, then $149/month/location.

opendentalrevenue.value

was$30-50M/yr

now300+

card's '$30-50M/yr' is our own model (practices x published fee), and its input is itself unverifiable: the 'about 20,000 practices' figure could not be found on the homepage, the fees page, the company blog, or Wikipedia. Growjo prints '$18.6M per year' at 128 employees, but the company's own blog says 300+ employees, so that estimate is built on a headcount the company contradicts and is not a usable replacement. Fees page states $199/month/location for the first 12 months, then $149/month/location.

jetpackrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

card's '$2M+/yr' is our inference from the Inc 5000 entry criterion, not a Jetpack number; Inc's profile page prints no revenue at all. Latka prints the opposite of our floor: 2023 revenue reached $818.1K, $0 raised, about 9 employees - contradicting our floor, so it should not be printed. Pricing page states $40/mo (Starter) to $50/mo (Premium) per user, not '$36-50.'

jetpackrevenue.label

wasest. floor, bootstrapped

nowaccountants and bookkeepers

card's '$2M+/yr' is our inference from the Inc 5000 entry criterion, not a Jetpack number; Inc's profile page prints no revenue at all. Latka prints the opposite of our floor: 2023 revenue reached $818.1K, $0 raised, about 9 employees - contradicting our floor, so it should not be printed. Pricing page states $40/mo (Starter) to $50/mo (Premium) per user, not '$36-50.'

jetpackrevenue.value

was$2M+/yr

now6,000+

card's '$2M+/yr' is our inference from the Inc 5000 entry criterion, not a Jetpack number; Inc's profile page prints no revenue at all. Latka prints the opposite of our floor: 2023 revenue reached $818.1K, $0 raised, about 9 employees - contradicting our floor, so it should not be printed. Pricing page states $40/mo (Starter) to $50/mo (Premium) per user, not '$36-50.'

ozbargainrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

card's '$2-6M/yr' is our own arithmetic (40M views x assumed RPM) and appears on no page. Founder Scott Yang states in the podcast writeup that OzBargain reaches about 40 million views a month. Publift's case study carries only percentage growth figures, zero dollars; on SavvyKai, Yang says revenue is 'all ads, mostly from Google AdSense' and gives no numbers. The card's own-cited $12.4M ZoomInfo figure is correctly ignored.

ozbargainrevenue.label

wasad rev/yr · our estimate

nowpage views/month

card's '$2-6M/yr' is our own arithmetic (40M views x assumed RPM) and appears on no page. Founder Scott Yang states in the podcast writeup that OzBargain reaches about 40 million views a month. Publift's case study carries only percentage growth figures, zero dollars; on SavvyKai, Yang says revenue is 'all ads, mostly from Google AdSense' and gives no numbers. The card's own-cited $12.4M ZoomInfo figure is correctly ignored.

ozbargainrevenue.value

was$2-6M

now40M+

card's '$2-6M/yr' is our own arithmetic (40M views x assumed RPM) and appears on no page. Founder Scott Yang states in the podcast writeup that OzBargain reaches about 40 million views a month. Publift's case study carries only percentage growth figures, zero dollars; on SavvyKai, Yang says revenue is 'all ads, mostly from Google AdSense' and gives no numbers. The card's own-cited $12.4M ZoomInfo figure is correctly ignored.

truckparkingclubrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

no page anywhere carries 'about $10M'; the card's own text concedes the Growjo page 403'd, meaning the old headline was printed from a page nobody read. Company PR (Yahoo Finance, CMO quoted) states 4,000 property member locations across 49 states and over 66,000 instantly reservable truck parking spaces, with no revenue and no take rate disclosed. Note location counts are stale in two directions: 4,000 (this PR) vs 5,000+ (a June 2025 PRNewswire release).

truckparkingclubrevenue.label

wasEst. revenue (2025)

nowbookable parking spaces

no page anywhere carries 'about $10M'; the card's own text concedes the Growjo page 403'd, meaning the old headline was printed from a page nobody read. Company PR (Yahoo Finance, CMO quoted) states 4,000 property member locations across 49 states and over 66,000 instantly reservable truck parking spaces, with no revenue and no take rate disclosed. Note location counts are stale in two directions: 4,000 (this PR) vs 5,000+ (a June 2025 PRNewswire release).

truckparkingclubrevenue.value

wasabout $10M

now66,000+

no page anywhere carries 'about $10M'; the card's own text concedes the Growjo page 403'd, meaning the old headline was printed from a page nobody read. Company PR (Yahoo Finance, CMO quoted) states 4,000 property member locations across 49 states and over 66,000 instantly reservable truck parking spaces, with no revenue and no take rate disclosed. Note location counts are stale in two directions: 4,000 (this PR) vs 5,000+ (a June 2025 PRNewswire release).

zerodharevenue.original

was(none)

now8,370 crore

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Entrackr carries FY24 revenue (from a founder blog post) as 'Rs 8,370 crore'; the card's $1B is our own INR->USD conversion (a second cited page, Wikipedia, separately shows a different figure, INR9,372 crore).

woodpeckerrevenue.original

was(none)

now22 136 tys. zl

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. biznesradar.pl carries 'przychody w wysokosci 22 136 tys. zl' (2024); the card's $5.5M is our own PLN->USD conversion.

wantedlyrevenue.original

was(none)

now49

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. irbank.net carries Wantedly's FY2025 operating revenue as '49億883万円' (JPY4.9B); the card's $33M, printed under a FILED badge, is our own JPY->USD conversion.

vintedrevenue.original

was(none)

now1.1bn

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Vinted's newsroom results release carries 'EUR1.1bn in annual revenue'; the card's $1.2B is our own EUR->USD conversion, not the company's.

tracxnrevenue.original

was(none)

now844.67M

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. stockanalysis.com carries Tracxn's FY25 revenue as '844.67M' (INR, sourced to S&P Global Market Intelligence) with no USD conversion on the page; the card's $10.1M is our own INR->USD arithmetic.

timeerevenue.original

was(none)

now34,289M

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Staffing Industry Analysts carries 'net sales JPY34,289M = USD 219.9M, +27.5% YoY'; the card's 'about $230M', under a FILED badge, is our own looser JPY->USD conversion (the disclosure's own USD figure is $219.9M).

supermetricsrevenue.original

was(none)

now50 million

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Growth Unhinged carries 'The company generates north of EUR 50 million ARR'; the card's $52M+ is our own EUR->USD conversion with no cited page carrying a dollar figure.

smallcaserevenue.original

was(none)

now67.4 crore

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Entrackr carries 'Smallcase revenue from operations surged to Rs 67.4 crore'; the card's $8M FY24-revenue figure, under a FILED badge, is our own INR->USD conversion.

sansanrevenue.original

was(none)

now41.5 billion

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. The logmi.jp English transcript of Sansan's FY2024 results briefing carries 'annual recurring revenue (ARR) exceeded JPY41.5 billion'; the card's $280M, printed under a FILED badge, is our own JPY->USD conversion.

pixtarevenue.original

was(none)

now2.66B

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. stockanalysis.com carries PIXTA's FY2025 net sales as '2.66B' JPY (-7.60% YoY); the card's $18M, under a FILED badge, is our own JPY->USD conversion carried by no cited page.

pagerorevenue.original

was(none)

now795.4 million

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Pagero's year-end report (Cision PDF) carries 'Net sales amounted to SEK 795.4 million'; the card's $75M, printed in a sourced slot, is our own SEK->USD conversion.

noterevenue.original

was(none)

now41.4

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. note inc.'s FY2025 IR post carries net sales as '41.4億円' (JPY4.14B, +25.0% YoY); the card's $27M is our own JPY->USD conversion.

mentarevenue.original

was(none)

now140

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. The founder's note.com post carries monthly revenue as '140万円' (JPY1.4M/mo); the card's '$13K MRR' is our own JPY->USD conversion.

konnectinsightsrevenue.original

was(none)

now800,000 to over 10 million

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Starter Story carries a 'tiered annual pricing model ranging from 800,000 to over 10 million INR'; the card's money_flow line '$10K-120K+/yr' is our own INR->USD conversion.

komootrevenue.original

was(none)

now50m

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. mainsights.io carries 'marketed off 2024 revenues of EUR 50m'; the card's $54M is our own EUR->USD conversion.

indiamartrevenue.original

was(none)

now1,388.4 Cr

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Inc42 carries 'operating revenue grew 16% to INR 1,388.4 Cr'; the card's $165M FY25-revenue figure, printed in a FILED-badged slot, is our own INR->USD conversion.

halopsarevenue.original

was(none)

now48,839,134

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. The Companies House FY25 accounts carry 'Turnover GBP48,839,134'; the card's $62M is our own GBP->USD conversion (the card does also show the GBP base transparently).

geoguessrrevenue.original

was(none)

now310 miljoner kronor

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. esportare.se (relaying Breakit) carries 'omsattningen fran 234 till 310 miljoner kronor'; the card's $29M 2024-revenue figure is our own SEK->USD conversion.

creemarevenue.original

was(none)

now2,535,110 thousand

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. The TDnet filing (biggo mirror) carries net sales as 'JPY2,535,110 thousand (+1.1% YoY)'; the card's $16.9M is our own JPY->USD conversion presented as filed.

complianzrevenue.original

was(none)

now5 - 25 million

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. dealmaker.nl carries 'team.blue acquires stake in Complianz 06-12-2023 EUR 5 - 25 million'; the card's $5-27M (attributed to dealmaker) is our own EUR->USD conversion.

cleartaxrevenue.original

was(none)

now209.84 cr

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Entrackr carries 'Clear's revenue spikes 93% to Rs 209.84 cr in FY24'; the card's revenue-block value 'about $25M' (FY24) is our own INR->USD conversion.

bharatmatrimonyrevenue.original

was(none)

now456 crore

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Screener.in / Storyboard18 carry 'revenue from operations of Rs 456 crore in FY2025'; the card's $55M is our own INR->USD conversion.

astrosagerevenue.original

was(none)

now50 - 100 Cr

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. Tracxn carries 'Annual Revenue Rs50 - Rs100 Cr as on Mar 31, 2025'; the card's $10M is our own INR->USD conversion of a point inside that band.

airtaskerrevenue.original

was(none)

now52.6 million

the headline is our currency conversion; this is what the source prints. ASX FY25 Appendix 4E carries 'Group statutory revenue grew 12.8% to $52.6 million' (AUD); audit flags this as our own A$->US$ arithmetic printed in a sourced slot.

woodpeckerrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

no cited page IS the filing — BiznesRadar is third-party financial media and the cited GPW page is only a listing notice, not an annual report; a journalist reading a report is STATED-by-journalist, not FILED. To keep FILED, cite Woodpecker's own raport roczny/ESPI report

webptrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the Battery Ventures page is stamped 'PAID CONTENT · BATTERY VENTURES' (an investor's sponsored article) and the $100M sentence is the writer's, not a founder quote; the only other carrier is a magazine headline, not the founder's own words — and neither source even says 'ARR', both describe revenue growth which the card converts to 'ARR' on its own

tracxnrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowEST

the number does originate in Tracxn's audited NSE/BSE results, but the card cites no filing, no exchange disclosure, and no company IR page — only a third-party data aggregator (stockanalysis/S&P) — and then prints a currency conversion performed by us. Either cite Tracxn's own results release and print the rupee figure, or badge it EST.

toptalrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

no cited page shows Toptal or its founders stating any revenue figure — every carrier is a journalist (Wikipedia→CNBC, TechCrunch→The Information); per the rule, a writer's claim not attributed to the company is EST. Toptal's own site carries no revenue at all.

titlecapturerevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the revenue label reads "ARR · founder-reported '24" and the badge reads STATED, but $5.6M is Latka's estimate, explicitly flagged "(Estimated)" on the page the card itself cites, and the card's own metric label says "Latka". The founder never reported $5.6M anywhere in the sources; he reported $4M, in 2023. The label "founder-reported '24" is false on both the source and the year.

taskmagicrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

STATED is defensible in kind for the $4M (it traces to the founder via a newsletter writer, NoCode Exits) but it's a second-hand relay, not a founder page — the one cited page that would make it first-hand (the X bio) is bot-walled. The exit size in the revenue slot ("mid-seven-figure") has no source at all and should not be badged STATED.

supermetricsrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the €50M+ sentence is Kyle Poyar's own unattributed claim in his newsletter (and an identical OpenView cross-post by the same author — one source, not two) — no cited page has the company or founder stating €50M+; the only first-party page cited tops out at €20M and calls €50M a hope, and the only founder-stated figure cited is €36M

smallcaserevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the figure originates in an RoC/MCA filing, but it's read and relayed by a journalist (Entrackr) — the card cites only Entrackr with no route to the filing itself (no MCA doc, no CIN, no RoC link). A journalist reading a filing is STATED-by-journalist, not FILED, which requires both origin and a route. Also the printed "$8M" is our own INR→USD arithmetic sitting in a FILED-badged slot.

sansanrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

FILED fails the routability test — the cited IR page carries net sales (¥43.2B), not ARR; no cited page carries ¥41.5B. The actual carrier is a CEO/CFO earnings-briefing transcript (logmi.jp) that was not cited on the card. Cite the FY2024 results briefing (or tanshin) or downgrade to STATED

reviewsiorevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

STATED is defensible in kind — Latka's reviews.io figures are founder-reported interview data, not marked '(Est.)' — but the only cited carrier of the $12M headline is Latka, an estimator platform; no founder or company page in the sources states $12M

remotiverevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $156K is a Latka estimate relayed by the cited article ('According to GetLatka, Remotive is doing over $156k in revenue in 2023'), not a company or founder statement — badging it STATED and labelling the metrics 'reported' turns an estimator's number into the company's own

publisherrocketrevenue.sourced

wasEST

nowSTATED

a founder-stated monthly revenue figure sits inside the card's own cited Mixergy interview ('Right now we're hitting around $130,000 a month... about 50% in profit') — EST was unnecessary since a STATED figure was available.

numeralrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the only cited carrier (SuperbCrew) attributes the whole revenue series to 'per Latka data' — an estimator, not a founder or company statement, despite the card's badge saying 'co-provided / company figures'

myexpattaxesrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $2.5M appears in Forbes' own voice, unattributed to Goldstein — the card's own metric label already reads 'press-cited', so the badge should agree with it

makuakerevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowEST

should not be FILED — the card cites no TSE filing (決算短信) at all, only a podcast, a 2019 IPO-news blog, a bot-walled news aggregator, a company page with no numbers, and a bot-walled stock-data site; no route to a filing exists on the card, and the number printed is a guidance forecast, not net sales

lunchmoneyrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $34K figure is an unattributed Starter Story stat box with no founder quote, tweet, or link beside it — a third party's unattributed stat is EST, not STATED

lacrmrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $5.4M figure is Latka's own estimate, explicitly marked "(Est.)" on the cited page; no cited founder source states $5.4M — the closest founder figure (an Indie Hackers post) is an older $3M ARR milestone

lcptrackerrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $31M carries no attribution to the founder on the cited Latka page — it is Latka's own 2024 data point; the founder's own quote on that same page states a smaller, different number, $25M

komootrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the EUR 50m figure is an M&A data provider's (Mainsights) proprietary sale-process estimate, and the Manager-Magazin numbers reach us only via a blog reader comment — neither is the company or a founder speaking, so STATED is wrong on both counts

inflectrarevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

$13M originates with Latka, an estimator, as its 2023 figure; the card's own "founder" source (Founderpath) never contains "13" and instead says $12M ARR ($10M by 2023) — a third-party figure is badged as founder speech

indiamartrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

FILED is defensible in kind — IndiaMART is BSE/NSE-listed and the card cites the annual report — but the annual report PDF exceeds a 10MB fetch limit and could not be opened to verify; the only readable cited carrier is Inc42, a journalist, so the chain a reader can actually follow is STATED-by-journalist

ifirmarevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

carrier is a financial-news site reporting the company's preliminary/estimated results announcement ('zapowiada', 'szacuje') — STATED-by-journalist by our own rule; FILED also requires routing a reader to the filing, and the only company document cited (Raport_polrocznySAP2024_caly.pdf) is the HALF-YEAR report for 1.01–30.06.2024, which cannot carry FY2024 figures — no openable FY2024 annual report was found (most recent listed is SA-R 2023)

geoguessrrevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the figure originates in GeoGuessr AB's Bolagsverket annual report and the card gives a route to it, so FILED is defensible in kind — but every readable carrier in the chain is journalism (Breakit → esportare), i.e. STATED-by-journalist; both card metrics are labelled 'Breakit', not the registry

biggerpocketsrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

traceable origin is a magazine writer's line (2017 5280 Magazine profile, bot-walled) about a private company; no founder or company statement of $7M appears on any readable cited page — should be EST, not STATED.

baremetricsrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $1.5M ARR headline is not on the source page — Josh Pigford published the $4M sale price and 2.65x multiple, never the ARR; '$1.5M' is our own arithmetic ($4M ÷ 2.65), which is EST by definition, though the label does show the division transparently.

audioeyerevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

the page tagged FILED is a PR Newswire earnings press release (unaudited), not a statutory filing; no 10-K is cited anywhere on the card — either cite the actual 10-K and keep FILED, or badge STATED.

empireflippersrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

this is the card's worst error, an explicit misrepresentation. The card's revenue_sentence says "$7.2M (2024) … founder-stated, GetLatka", but the Latka page itself says the opposite, verbatim: "We have not recorded a podcast or interview with the company's management, therefore this data is an estimation." Latka is an estimator, the figure is Latka's estimate, and nobody at Empire Flippers stated it — the words "founder-stated" must be removed from the card.

dropmagicrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

STATED requires a locatable founder statement; there is none — the only openable evidence is a third-party newsletter (High Signal) and a verification service (TrustMRR). Also flag: "$1M+ ARR run rate" reads like our own rounding of $117K MRR x 12.

cyberleadsrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

metric "annual revenue $500K+" is labelled source "founder" but no founder-authored cited page carries it — the two pages that DO carry it are third-party write-ups (the Indie Hackers post, written about him, not by him, and Gold Penguin's "half a million dollars per year"); the cited founder source https://www.alexwest.co/ is a bare blog index, not a permalink to any figure. Latka says $644.2K for 2024 and $500K in 2023 — i.e. $500K is the 2023 number, not current.

complycuberevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the number comes from Latka, an estimator; Latka's own page marks the 2024 figure "latest figure estimated". The card's own metric labels say "Latka" and its own sentence says "(Latka-reported)", yet the badge reads STATED. There is no founder or company statement of revenue anywhere in the sources.

collabstrrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the "eight figures" sentence is the writer's own unattributed claim ("And while fully bootstrapped, the company has grown to eight figures in revenue..."), not a founder or company statement — STATED requires the founder/company to have said it. The cited Forbes piece quotes co-founder Kyle Dulay but carries no revenue figure at all.

buttondownrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowEST

the $392K level originates with Latka, an estimator, full stop — the card's own label admits the provenance ("2024 (Latka)") while the badge says STATED, which is self-contradicting; the founder's year-in-review gives only percentages (+61% revenue, +72% unique subscribers, "We remain cash-flow profitable") and discloses no absolute figure. A founder-stated growth rate applied to an estimator's base is still an estimate.

chrono24revenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

The FY2021 group accounts of the parent (MPN Marketplace Networks GmbH) exist on Bundesanzeiger — but Bundesanzeiger has no stable per-document URL at all, so there is no link a reader can follow, and we never read the figure ourselves (the document is behind a CAPTCHA). We said as much in the honesty note and still badged it FILED. It comes down. Separately: under DiRUG, accounts from FY2022 go to the Unternehmensregister, and MPN's consolidated FY2024 report was published in March 2026 — so €103.2M is three years stale.

dedaorevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

The prospectus we cite does not contain the figure: its reporting period ends at H1 2021 (RMB 438.5M for the half). The RMB 843M full-year number is in a LATER Shenzhen filing — the third-round review inquiry reply of June 2022 — which we could only reach through a third-party mirror, not the regulator's own copy. The number appears sound; our citation does not reach it, so the badge does.

idealistarevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

Idealista's FY2024 group accounts are deposited at Spain's Registro Mercantil, but Spain publishes no free document URL — the accounts must be bought, and there is no per-company permalink. So no reader can follow us to the filing, and under our own rule the badge comes down. Our €300M+ is the GROUP figure as reported by trade press. Worth knowing: the entity-level number a reader is most likely to find is €159.1M (Idealista S.A.U., Spain only).

userwaysources

was$13.8M FY2023 cited to a Wikipedia page that does not contain it

nowTASE/MAYA annual report 2023 linked — revenue $13.76M vs $7.75M

The number was right and genuinely filed; the citation was not. A reader following our source could not reach our figure, which is the one thing we promise they can do. The MAYA filing is now linked and carries it exactly.

bark-comrevenue.label

was£70M — "£15M ($19M) profit, '22"

now£70M — "FY2022 turnover · filed"

The card asserted a £15M profit for 2022 and badged it FILED while citing no filing — only Wikipedia and Trustpilot. Bark's audited accounts are public at Companies House (10614196) and are now linked, but they are a scanned PDF that cannot be machine-read. I could not verify £15M, and I will not swap in another figure I have not seen myself. The profit claim is withdrawn. Accounts to 31 Dec 2024 have since been filed, so even the year is stale.

envatorevenue.sourced

wasFILED

nowSTATED

The $245M is the acquisition price Shutterstock announced in a press release. A deal price in a PR is a company statement, not a filing. FILED is the strongest claim we make, and from today it requires a source URL a reader can actually follow to the filing.

mrscraperrevenue

was$1.7M/yr, 'by mid-2025'

now$150K+/mo, founder-stated Feb 2025

The interview is dated February 2025, not mid-2025, and in its body the founder says 'around $150k+ per month' — about $1.8M/yr. The card now carries his words and his date. Separately, the header of that same Starter Story page now displays '$756K revenue/mo', five times what the founder says on the page beneath it. We do not know which is true; the honesty note now says so rather than quietly picking one. The '$2.4K ARR at purchase' metric rested on a tweet that no longer loads, and is removed.

userwaysources

was$13.8M FY2023 cited to Wikipedia

nowcite the TASE filing / financial data directly

The number is correct and genuinely filed — UserWay was TASE-listed. But the Wikipedia page we cite for it does not contain it. A source that does not carry the number it is attached to is a trust bug even when the number is right: a reader who follows our citation cannot land on our figure, which is the one thing we promise they can do.

userwayprice

wasPays $49-149/mo for the widget

nowPays $49-$249/mo for the widget, by traffic

userway.org/pricing now runs $49 / $119 / $249 a month, read in a browser. The $149 ceiling was true once (a 2024 archive capture shows the old tiers) and is not now.

swapstackmoney_flow

wasSwapstack bills brand +10% fee (present tense)

nowSwapstack billed the brand a 10% fee — until it was wound down into beehiiv

The card disclosed the 2023 acquisition but described the business as if it were still running. It is not: beehiiv wound the platform down and migrated its users to the beehiiv Ad Network. 'Acquired' and 'gone' are different facts and a reader should not have to guess which one we mean.

52framesprice

wasPremium extras: $130-260/yr

nowPatron tiers, now $199 and $360 a year

Read on 52frames.com/become-patron: the tiers are $199 and $360 (currently discounted to $299). $130 and $260 appear nowhere. Separately, the $11K/mo headline is a May-2023 figure that carried no date on the card — a true number presented as present tense, which is its own kind of false.

expresstrucktaxprice

was$14.90 per 2290 filing

now$19.90 (single vehicle), up to $379.90 for the largest fleet

The cited pricing page lists $19.90 for a single vehicle; $14.90 appears nowhere on it. Prices are the fastest-decaying field on any card. The ownership was also stale by two moves: the product left SPAN Enterprises in 2022 and now operates under Fleetworthy, so the 'SPAN group' revenue estimate described a company that no longer owns it.

idenfyrevenue

was€6.0M FY2024, +57% YoY (FILED)

now€5.25M FY2025, -13.2% YoY (FILED)

FY2025 has been filed and the trend has reversed. Scoris, reading the Lithuanian registry: "2025 finansiniais metais bendrovė gavo 5,25 mln. Eur pajamų... Pajamos per metus sumažėjo 13,2 %." The FY2024 figure was correct when written. But a card that leads with a growth rate does not just go stale when growth stops — it begins asserting the opposite of the truth. This is the sharpest lesson in the audit: levels age, rates lie.

ravelrymoney_flow

wasRavelry keeps about 3.5% of pattern sales + self-served member ads

nowDesigners pay a capped monthly fee on pattern sales (free up to $20/mo); shops buy ads

Ravelry does not take a percentage of pattern sales. Its own post on how it makes money describes fees running "from free all the way up to $20 a month depending on sales volume" — a capped monthly charge — plus ads, merchandise and affiliate commissions. The 3.5% appears on no page of Ravelry's that we could open, and it cuts against their own statement that 98.7% of a pattern sale goes to the designer. Same shape of error as Chrono24: we described the wrong mechanism, not merely the wrong number.

ravelryrevenue

was11M+ members (STATED)

now9M+ members (STATED)

The 11M was a third-party stats blog, badged as though Ravelry had said it. Ravelry's own About page says "over 9 million yarn-loving friends". Our own metric row already labelled the same number an estimate — the card was contradicting itself on its own front.

cults3drevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowFILED

The €868,555 net profit is from CULTS' accounts filed at the French registry (societe.com reproduces the filed "Résultat net" line for 2023). The card's own label says "2023 filing". Badged STATED, which is the wrong kind — the same hand-set-badge defect as pappers, in the same direction.

pappersrevenue.sourced

wasSTATED

nowFILED

The €492,823 net profit comes from Pappers' own accounts filed at the French registry (RNE) — the card's label already said "(filed)" and the honesty note already said "from the balance-sheet filing". It was badged STATED, which says a founder told us. Nobody told us; a registry did. This is the badge error running in the conservative direction, but it is still the badge lying about where a number came from.

yotirevenue.sourced

wasFILED — $37M

nowSTATED — £29M

The figure is the CEO's LinkedIn post, relayed by Biometric Update. It is in no filing: Yoti's most recent full accounts at Companies House (filed 17 Nov 2025) cover the period ending 31 March 2025. The card badged it FILED and its honesty note claimed it was "filed at Companies House". FILED is the strongest claim this product makes and it was attached to a founder statement. Also: the source says US$39M; our $37M was our own conversion presented as the source's number, so the headline is now the pound figure that was actually said.

testimonialmoney_flow

wasVisitors sign up; paying $25/mo+ removes branding and unlocks video

nowRemoving the badge costs $50/mo (Ultimate) — not the $25 Starter tier

Both halves were false. On testimonial.to/pricing, "Remove Testimonial branding" is ticked only from the $50 Ultimate plan (Free and the $25 Starter both show a grey dash), and video is not a paid unlock at all — the free plan includes "2 video and 10 text testimonials". Worse than the error: our honesty note asserted that this loop was "confirmed on the live pricing page (fact)". It had not been. Claiming a verification we did not perform is the one thing this product cannot do.

freetaxusadies_counter

was(the card's source list, pasted over the top of it)

nowEven before it was cancelled, Direct File covered only simple federal returns in a handful of states. FreeTaxUSA files the complex ones at $0-$16.

The source list had been written into dies_counter, so paying members were shown a bibliography where the argument against our own verdict belongs. The argument itself was sitting one field away in dies_evidence. Both are back where they belong. Separately: the honesty note attributed "82M+ returns filed" to the About page; that figure is on the homepage, and no page anywhere says "original" member of the Free File Alliance.

ipinfomoat

wasEnterprise trust: Cloudflare, Cisco, Microsoft

nowEnterprise trust: Cloudflare, Cisco, Snowflake

We cited IPinfo's homepage for the customer logos. Microsoft appears nowhere in that page's HTML — checked in a real browser, not a text extract. Snowflake does. A customer name we cannot source is exactly the thing we criticise third-party estimators for.

chrono24rev_line

wasAbout $215M revenue in 2024 (est.): dealer subscriptions plus a 2-8% escrow take on $1.33B GMV.

now6.5% commission from private sellers; dealers pay EUR 199-2,199/mo rent plus an undisclosed transaction fee. Escrow is free. Group revenue EUR 103.2M, FY2021 (last filed).

The old line was backwards, not merely unsourced. Chrono24's own FAQ: "In most cases, Buyer Protection is a free service." We were taxing the one thing they give away. The real meter is a published 6.5% sales commission for private sellers, and for dealers a monthly listing subscription plus a fee Chrono24 deliberately does not publish ("dynamically calculated for each sale", behind a dealer login). The $215M figure came from one third-party estimator that now paywalls its 2024 breakdown, while another puts 2025 at $875M — a fourfold disagreement between strangers is not a figure.

cellartrackerrevenue

wasabout $2-4M/yr (EST)

nowUndisclosed — estimate withdrawn

The estimate rested on a single input: "about 8% of registered users pay." Its only source was a Subscription Insider case study, now a 404. The one surviving Wayback capture shows the article body was behind a members paywall — the visible excerpt is literal Lorem ipsum placeholder text. The 8% existed only in the headline; nobody has ever read what it was based on. It is also dated May 2014, and it measured a pay-what-you-want model CellarTracker abolished in March 2024 (they now charge $40-$500 a year, tiered by cellar size). The founder has since said the paid rate doubled. No current conversion rate is public, so there is nothing honest to rebuild an estimate from.