Kaeda
Free · Sourced
← All cases
Termageddon
USA · Bootstrapped · est. 2016 · privacy-compliance SaaS
👤 Donata Stroink-Skillrud & Hans Skillrud (Donata is a licensed privacy attorney chairing the ABA ePrivacy Committee; Hans ran a 12-person web agency. Law meets distribution.)🌐 site𝕏LinkedInLinkedIn

Give web agencies a free license; they resell auto-updating policies to every client. The channel is the edge.

Will it work? · our read
Law, not code. Generation is commoditized — even ChatGPT drafts a policy. The edge is an attorney on record plus auto-updates when laws move, resold through its agency partners.
01How the money moves
New privacy law passes (GDPR, CCPA, 20+ US states)
Agency installs Termageddon on client sites
$12/mo per license recurs; policies auto-update
02The numbers
$1M+
Partner recurring revenue (Jan 2024)
termageddon
$119/yr
Per license (or $12/mo)
pricing pg
20+
US state privacy laws now in force
IAPP
Total company ARR is undisclosed; $1M+ is the partner channel's recurring revenue, per Termageddon (Jan 2024). Agency partners page
$1M+ partner-driven recurring revenue (Jan 2024); total company ARR undisclosed.
🔒
The facts are free. The judgment is for members.
You've seen how the money moves, the numbers, and every source — free, on all 365 cases, always. Members get the part you can't look up: why it won · where the moat really is · how it dies · how it beats its rivals — plus the 🚀 launchpad prompt that turns any case into a plan for your business.
Sources stay public, always · cancel anytime · 14-day refund
(demo: preview the full teardown)
Sourcesupdated · daily
Total company revenue is undisclosed (bootstrapped, private). The only first-party figure is Termageddon's own statement (agency-partners page, Jan 2024) that partners have generated $1M+ in recurring revenue — a channel proxy, not audited total ARR; marked STATED / not independently confirmed. Founding year (2016), founders and Donata's attorney/ABA credentials, the free-license agency-reseller model, $12/mo-$119/yr pricing, six auto-updating policy types, and the "tens of thousands of policies" claim are documented first-party. The dies scenario, CENTS grades, and rival weights are our read [inference], not company claims. No drama fabricated — this is an execution + regulation-tailwind story, won on legal credibility and distribution, not a plot twist. We never score you.